Abstract
This paper examines the idea that just as there are specific factors that can affect the performance of a task in human reliability analysis (HRA) models, there are also specific characteristics that will impact the likelihood of a recovery from an error state. The first set of factors is commonplace in many HRA models and methods and fits well with the common understanding of task completion and human error. This paper seeks to set out a brief list of measurable factors that would influence a recovery in both negative and positive means and various design practices and tools that can assist in these processes. By focusing on recovery, and specifically only actions that come after the human error or post initiator, this paper seeks to highlight positive design changes, areas of improvement, and a more robust design framework that can capture the second half of an erroneous action and empower the operator to successfully guide a system to safety. Two ideas, forward and backward error recovery, are discussed in terms of what potential changes they may make to designing complex process control interfaces and displays. As the nuclear power industry seeks to implement digital control schemes in various systems, there could be clear design decisions that can be made to aid the future operator in recovering from an erroneous action in a way that prevents any deleterious effects on the plant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nielsen, J.: 10 heuristics for user interface design: Article by Jakob Nielsen, 24 April 1994. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed 10 Feb 2020
Campbell, R.H., Randell, B.: Error recovery in asynchronous systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-12(8), 811–826 (1986)
Issarny, V., Tartanoglu, F., Romanovsky, A., Levy, N.: Coordinated forward error recovery for composite web services. In: 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, Proceedings, Florence, pp. 167–176 (2003)
Suhm, B., Myers, B., Waibel, A.: Interactive recovery from speech recognition errors in speech user interfaces. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1996, Philadelphia, PA, USA, vol. 2, pp. 865–868 (1996)
Ulrich, T.A., Boring, R.l., Lew, R.: Qualitative or quantitative data for nuclear control room usability studies? A pragmatic approach to data collection and presentation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1674–1678 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621380
Wang, C., Hwang, S.: A stochastic maintenance management model with recovery factor. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 10(2), 154–165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410539222
Lüdtke, A., Osterloh, J.P., Mioch, T., Rister, F., Looije, R.: Cognitive modelling of pilot errors and error recovery in flight management tasks. In: Palanque, P., Vanderdonckt, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) Human Error, Safety and Systems Development. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5962. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Acknowledgments
This work of authorship was prepared as an account of work sponsored by Idaho National Laboratory, an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Idaho National Laboratory is a multi-program laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance LLC, for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mortenson, T., Boring, R.L. (2020). Forward and Backward Error Recovery Factors in Digital Human-System Interface Design. In: Arezes, P., Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1204. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50946-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50946-0_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50945-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50946-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)