Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Perceived Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in the Asset and Wealth Management Industry in the Western Cape, South Africa

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolving Perspectives on ICTs in Global Souths (IDIA 2020)

Abstract

Blockchain is an archive of data records known as blocks with key functionalities that include validation, security and preservation. Blockchain has been applied in a wide range of industries, including the financial sector. However, little is known about its adoption and usefulness in industries operating within developing countries. Moreover, while some studies have focused on the financial sector, the Asset Wealth Management (AWM) industry remains relatively unexplored. This preliminary study has identified factors influencing the adoption of blockchain in the AWM industry in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Through a qualitative exploratory study, perceptions of AWM experts were gathered on how blockchain adoption is influenced by the technology’s compatibility, complexity and relative advantage. The influence of the South African context was also explored. A preliminary framework is being proposed that will inform an in-depth, longitudinal study on blockchain adoption and use within AWM organizations in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo, Y., Liang, C.: Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Finan. Innov. 2(1), 2–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0034-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K.: Where is current research on blockchain technology? - A systematic review. PLoS ONE 11(10), 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvseike, R., Iversen, G.: Blockchain and the future of money and finance a qualitative exploratory study of blockchain technology and implications for the monetary and financial system. Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway, Master’s thesis (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lundström, K.V.: Impact from the blockchain technology on the Nordic capital market. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, Master’s thesis (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tostevin, P., Wightman, N.: Savills insights & opinions. Tech. Cities 6, 2–3 (2017). https://www.siliconcape.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Savills-Tech-Cities-2017-report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iansiti, M., Lakhani, K.R.: The truth about blockchain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(1), 118–127 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deshpande, A., Stewart, K., Lepetit, L., Gunashekar, S.: Distributed ledger technologies/blockchain: challenges, opportunities and the prospects for standards. Overview report, The British Standards Institution (BSI) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y., Singgih, M., Wang, J., Rit, M.: Making sense of blockchain technology: How will it transform supply chains? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 211, 221–236 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nofer, M., Gomber, P., Hinz, O., Schiereck, D.: Blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59(3), 183–187 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Chen, X., Wang, H.: Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 14(4), 352–375 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thavanathan, J.: Process innovation with blockchain in banking-a case study of how blockchain can change the KYC process in banks. Master’s thesis, NTNU (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoy, M.B.: An introduction to the blockchain and its implications for libraries and medicine. Med. Ref. Serv. Q. 36(3), 273–279 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buckley, R., Malady, L.: Building consumer demand for digital financial services – the new regulatory frontier. J. Finan. Perspect. 3(3), 10–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kshetri, N., Voas, J.: Blockchain in developing countries. IT Prof. 20(2), 11–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kshetri, N.: Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? Third World Q. 38(8), 1710–1732 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weiss, M., Botha, A., Herselman, M., Loots, G.: Blockchain as an enabler for public mHealth solutions in South Africa. In: IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa), pp. 1–8 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ge, L., et al.: Blockchain for agriculture and food No. 2017-112. Wageningen Economic Research (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chuen, D.L.K., Teo, E.G.S.: Emergence of FinTech and the LASIC principles. J. Finan. Perspect. 3(3), 31–32 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sindzingre, A.: The impact of the 2008–2009 crisis on commodity-dependent low-income african countries: confirming the relevance of the concept of poverty trap? J. Int. Dev. 24(8), 989–1007 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y.K., Misra, S.K., Rana, N.P., Raghavan, V., Akella, V.: Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49, 114–129 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.A.: Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handb. Econ. Growth 1, 385–472 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lombard, J.A.: End-consumer trust and adoption of smart contracts in life insurance in South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kshetri, N.: Potential roles of blockchain in fighting poverty and reducing financial exclusion in the global south. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 20(4), 201–204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2017.1391370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hernandez, K.: Blockchain for Development – Hope or Hype? Institute for Development (IDS) (2017). https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/blockchain-for-development-hope-or-hype/

  25. Larios-Hernández, G.J.: Blockchain entrepreneurship opportunity in the practices of the unbanked. Bus. Horizons 60(6), 865–874 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, K., Kang, T.: Does technology against corruption always lead to benefit? The potential risks and challenges of the blockchain technology. In: OECD’s Anti-Corruption and Integrity Forum (2017). https://www.oecd.org/cleangovbiz/Integrity-Forum-2017-Kim-Kang-blockchain-technology.pdf

  27. Baruri, P.: Blockchain powered financial inclusion. In: Presentation at the International Monetary Fund Global Symposium on Innovative Financial Inclusion: Harnessing Innovation for Inclusive Finance (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pisa, M.: Reassessing expectations for blockchain and development. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob. 12(1–2), 80–88 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lielacher, A.: Will the Blockchain Kill Corruption in The Developing World? BTCMANAGER (2016). https://btcmanager.com/will-the-blockchain-kill-corruption-in-the-developing-world/

  30. Frank, F., Koehler, R., Polatidis, H.: Asset management standard for the wind power industry. Master’s thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. PwC: Asset & wealth management revolution: Embracing exponential change, pp. 6–7 (2017). https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/asset-management/asset-management-insights/assets/awm-revolution-full-report-final.pdf

  32. Courbe, J., Davies, S.: Insights from PwC’s global asset and wealth management practice, pp. 6–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andersen, K.A., Leivestad, K.L.: Innovation alliances: a case study of the Norwegian financial services industry. Master’s thesis, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hoon, A.: Insights from PwC’s global asset and wealth management practice, pp. 12–13 (2017). https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/financial-services/asset-management/publications/assets/pwc-am-insights-january-2017.pdf

  35. Cocca, T.: Potential and limitations of virtual advice in wealth management. J. Finan. Transform. 44, 45–57 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. EY: Blockchain innovation in wealth and asset management Benefits and key challenges to adopting this technology, pp. 3–6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, M., Yen, D., Hurlburt, G.: Financial technologies and applications. IT Prof. 20(2), 27–33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2018.021921648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lopez, J., Babcic, S., De La Ossa, A.: Advice goes virtual: how new digital investment services are changing the wealth management landscape. J. Finan. Perspect. 3(3), 157–159 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M.: The Process of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peansupap, V., Walker, D.: Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: a micro analysis. Constr. Innov. 5(3), 135–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170510815221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chau, P., Tam, K.: Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS Q. 21(1), 4–6 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/249740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tan, M., Teo, T.: Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 1–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L.: Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 23, 183–213 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Al-Jabri, I.M., Sohail, M.S.: Mobile banking adoption: application of diffusion of innovation theory. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 13(4), 379–391 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, Y.H., Hsieh, Y.C., Hsu, C.N.: Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: supporting employees’ intentions to use e-learning systems. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 14(4), 124 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lou, T.F., Li, E.Y.: Integrating innovation diffusion theory and the technology acceptance model: the adoption of blockchain technology from business managers’ perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Electronic Business, pp. 293–296. ICEB, Dubai, UAE, 4–8 December 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lee, Y.H.: Exploring key factors that affect consumers to adopt e-reading services. Master’s thesis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A.: Blockchain Revolution, vol. 8, pp. 61–64. Penguin, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Agarwal, R., Prasad, J.: A: Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inf. Syst. Res. 9(2), 204–215 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Padilla-Vega, R., Sénquiz-Díaz, C., Ojeda, A.: Toward a conceptual framework of technology adoption: factors impacting the acceptance of the mobile technology in the international business growth. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 6(1), 81–82 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oliveira, T., Martins, M.: Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 14(1), 110–121 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lin, A.: Bridging positivist and interpretivist approaches to qualitative methods. Policy Stud. J. 26(1), 162–180 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01931.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students, 7 edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Myers, M., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17(1), 2–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., Alkassim, R.S.: Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5(1), 1–4 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Marshall, M.: Sampling for qualitative research. Family Pract. 13(6), 522–526 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Clarke, V., Braun, V.: Teaching thematic analysis: overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist 26(2), 120–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen Tanner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Castro, P., Tanner, M., Johnston, K. (2020). Perceived Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in the Asset and Wealth Management Industry in the Western Cape, South Africa. In: Junio, D., Koopman, C. (eds) Evolving Perspectives on ICTs in Global Souths. IDIA 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1236. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52014-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52014-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52013-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52014-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics