Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Physics-Based Enterprise Modeling Approach for Risks and Opportunities Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2020)

Abstract

Management Science tries to enable managers and decision-makers to take the desired solutions to guide systems toward their objectives. This requires identifying the different dimensions of the system. Organizations and enterprises are complex systems associated with uncertainties in dynamic business contexts, that interact with their environments. Due to pressures such as collaborations with their customers, suppliers, their environment, the seek for innovations, etc., the performance may be changed by internal and external risks and opportunities that push and pull the enterprises like forces. Thanks to Physics of Decision (PoD), by identifying these pressures according to the organization’s features and objectives, unstable conditions due to the forces, can be detected and identified as risks and opportunities. This article attempts to present a time-dependent dynamic framework, based on a physical approach to identify risks and opportunities seen as forces applied on Organizations and Enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wulan, M., Petrovic, D.: A fuzzy logic based system for risk analysis and evaluation within enterprise collaborations. Comput. Ind. 63(8), 739–748 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fishwick, P., Anumba, C.J., Lee, T.R., Tummala, R., Schoenherr, T.: Handbook of Dynamic System Modeling. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420010855

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Benaben, F., Montreuil, B., Faugere, L., Lauras, M., Gou, J., Mu, W.: A physics-based theory to navigate across risks and opportunities tn the performance space: application to crisis management. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bekefi, T., Epstein, M., Yuthas, K.: Creating growth: using opportunity risk management effectively. J. Account. 205, 72–77 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, C., Anumba, C. J., Lee, T. R., Tummala, R., Schoenherr, T.: Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 16(6), 474–483. (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. Software Syst. Model. 13(3), 941–962 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0273-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zoet, M., Welke, R., Versendaal, J., Ravesteyn, P.: Aligning risk management and compliance considerations with business process develop. E-Comm. Web Technol. 5692, 157 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Danesh, M.H., Yu, E.: Towards a framework for shaping & forming enterprise capabilities. In: Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D., Kirikova, M. (eds.) PoEM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 335, pp. 188–202. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02302-7_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Panagiotou, G.: Bringing SWOT into focus. Bus. Strat. Rev. 14(2), 8–10 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, J., Bénaben, F., Gou, J., Mu, W.: A proposal for risk identification approach in collaborative networks considering susceptibility to danger. In: Camarinha-Matos, Luis M., Afsarmanesh, H., Rezgui, Y. (eds.) PRO-VE 2018. IAICT, vol. 534, pp. 74–84. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99127-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Benaben, F., Lauras, M., Montreuil, B., Faugère, L., Gou, J., Mu, W.: Physics of Organization Dynamics: An AI Framework for opportunity and risk management. In: IESM 19–8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management. pp. 396 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zarei, E., Azadeh, A., Aliabadi, M.M., Mohammadfam, I.: Dynamic safety risk modeling of process systems using bayesian network. Process Saf. Prog. 36(4), 399–407 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salem, S.E., Mazhar, S.: The benefits of the application of activity based cost system-field study on manufacturing companies operating in allahabad city-India. IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 16(11), 39–45 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoque, Z., James, W.: Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. J. Manag. Account. Res. 12(1), 1–17 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MacGregor, J.F., Kourti, T.: Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Eng. Pract. 3(3), 403–414 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harputlugil, T.I.M.U.C.I.N., Prins, M.A.T.T.H.I.J.S., Gültekin, A.T., Topçu, Y.I.: Conceptual framework for potential implementations of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for design quality assessment (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, J., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Gao, R.X., Wu, D.: Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J. Man. Syst. 48, 144–156 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nafe Moradkhani or Frederick Benaben .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moradkhani, N., Faugère, L., Jeany, J., Lauras, M., Montreuil, B., Benaben, F. (2020). A Physics-Based Enterprise Modeling Approach for Risks and Opportunities Management. In: Grabis, J., Bork, D. (eds) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. PoEM 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63478-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63479-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics