Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Analysis of Risks Assessment in Multi Software Projects Development Environment Using Classification Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1339))

  • 1776 Accesses

Abstract

Risk Assessment contributes to optimizing the allocation of resources at the enterprise level, which achieves its goals, so the matter needs centralized management of risks on the enterprise level, not for each project. The risk assessment is carried out through several stages and by using various methods. This research provides an analytical view of risk assessment in concurrent multiple software projects environment. Research experiment has proven high levels of accuracy, reaching almost from 93% by using Simple Logistic into 98% using REP Tree technique. in determining risk levels in a concurrent multi-project environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnuphaptrairong, T.: Top ten lists of software project risks: evidence from the literature survey. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. 1. Hong Kong (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bai, J., Xia, K., Lin, Y., Wu, P.: Attribute reduction based on consistent covering rough set and its application. Hindawi Complexity, vol. 2017, p. 9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bannerman, P.L.: A reassessment of risk management in software projects. In: Handbook on Project Management and scheduling, vol. 2, pp. 1119–1134 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barafort, B., Mesquida, A., Mas, A.: ISO 31000-based integrated risk management process assessment model for IT organizations. J. Softw. Evol. Process 31(1), e1984 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., Wortmann, H.: Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 28, 493–503 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garvey, P.R.: Analytical Methods for Risk Management: A Systems Engineering Perspective. Chapman-Hall/CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (UK), Boca Raton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Han, W.-M., Huang, S.: An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. J. Syst. Softw. 80(1), 42–50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hashim, N.I., Chileshe, N., Baroudi, B.: Management challenges within multiple project environments: lessons for developing countries. Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. Conf. Ser. 1(2), 21–31 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO 31000. ISO 31000:2018. Risk management - Principles and Guidelines, Risk Management (2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html

  10. Jr, J., Wanderley, M., Gusmão, C., Moura, H.: Application of metrics for risk management in environment of multiple software development projects. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems – Volume 1, pp. 504–511. ICEIS (2016). ISBN 978–989–758–187–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klevanskiy, N.N., Tkachev, S.I., Voloshchouk, L.A.: Multi-project scheduling: multicriteria time-cost trade-off problem. Procedia Comput. Sci. 150(2019), 237–243 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, X., Jiang, Q., Hsu, M.K., Chen, Q.: Support or risk? software project risk assessment model based on rough set theory and backpropagation neural network. Sustainability 11(17), 4513 (2019). https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

  13. Marchwicka, E.: A technique for supporting decision process of global software project monitoring and rescheduling based on risk analysis. Journal of Decision Systems (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1790825

  14. Pimchangthong, D., Boonjing, V.: Effects of risk management practices on IT project success. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 8, 30–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2017-0004

  15. Vitalitychicago (2020). https://vitalitychicago.com/blog/agile-projects-are-more-successful-traditional-projects/ visited on 1/7/2020

  16. Willumsen, P., Oehmen, J., Stingl, V., Geraldi, J.: Value creation through project risk management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 37(5), 731–749 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rong, W., Ruixia, Y.: An algorithm for attribute reduction based on classification of condition attributes in rough set. In: 2017 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 5534–5537. Chongqing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shaukat, Z., Naseem, R., Zubair, M.: A dataset for software requirements risk prediction. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, pp. 112–118. IEEE Computer Society (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tabunshchyk, G., Arras, P., Merode, D.V.: Risk management in multi-national projects. In: 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications, pp. 24–26. Warsaw, Poland, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, H., Artman, E., Woelfer, J.: Information technology project risk management: bridging the gap between research and practice. J. Inform. Technol. 27(1), 17–34 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibraheem M. Alharbi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alharbi, I.M., Alyoubi, A.A., Altuwairiqi, M., Ellatif, M.A. (2021). Analysis of Risks Assessment in Multi Software Projects Development Environment Using Classification Techniques. In: Hassanien, AE., Chang, KC., Mincong, T. (eds) Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications. AMLTA 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69717-4_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics