Abstract
Demographic change is leading to a higher proportion of older adults. The health and care sector must adapt because diseases and functional limitations increase with age. Strategies are required to promote and improve the functional capacity of older adults. A key factor in protecting health is regular physical activity. However, older adults do not move enough. It is therefore important to develop strategies to encourage older adults to be physically active. Regular motivation and guidance are helpful, but often not feasible due to staff shortages and high costs of personalized trainers. One solution is to use technology. Several studies have shown the positive effects of robots as instructors and motivators for physical activity. However, it has not been examined whether it is suitable in the private household. Therefore, the explorative user study investigated whether a socially assistive robot could be a practical solution to motivate older adults living independently to exercise regularly. Seven older adults participated. They trained one week with the robot as an instructor. The participants enjoyed the robot, but some technical difficulties such as slowness, communication, face recognition, stability, and acoustic problems occured. The participants experienced the robot as motivating, but they expected habituation effects. Even if the robot used was not suitable for autonomous training at home, this research can help find new ways to motivate older adults to engage in regular physical activity and improve technical solutions with the involvement of older adults.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alzheimer’s Disease International: World Alzheimer Report 2018. The state of the art of dementia research: New frontiers. Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI), London (2018). https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2018.pdf
Bangsbo, J., Blackwell, J., Boraxbekk, C.-J., Caserotti, P., Dela, F., Evans, A.B., et al.: Copenhagen consensus statement 2019: physical activity and ageing. Br. J. Sports Med. 53(14), 856–858 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100451
Bedaf, S., Gelderblom, G.J., De Witte, L.: Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: what activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assistive Technol.: Official J. RESNA 27(2), 88–100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2014.978916
Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., Kemper, C., Rammstedt, B.: Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung subjektiver Kompetenzerwartungen: Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala (ASKU). GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Mannheim (2012)
Bornschlegl, M., Fischer, R., Petermann, F.: Erfolgreiches kognitives Altern: Zusammenhang der kognitiven Leistungen mit Aktivität und Zufriedenheit. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie 27, 173–187 (2016)
Brack, Z.: Programming and evaluating a robotic exercise coach to promote physical activity among elderly people. Master Thesis. ETH, Zurich (2019)
Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8, 2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00
Buhl, S.F., Beck, A.M., Christensen, B., Caserotti, P.: Effects of high-protein diet combined with exercise to counteract frailty in pre-frail and frail community-dwelling older adults: study protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Trials 21(1), 637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04572-z
Büla, C., Jotterand, S., Martin, B.W., Bize, R., Lenoble-Hoskovec, C., Seematter-Bagnoud, L.: Bewegung im Alter: Dafür ist es nie zu spät! Swiss Med. Forum 14, 836–841 (2014)
Čaić, M., Avelino, J., Mahr, D., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Bernardino, A.: Robotic versus human coaches for active aging: an automated social presence perspective. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(4), 867–882 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0507-2
Cunningham, C., O’Sullivan, R., Caserotti, P., Tully, M.A.: Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 30(5), 816–827 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13616
Dahms, R., Haesner, M.: Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 13(1), 46–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-017-0610-5
Dorner, T.E., Schindler, K.: Gesundheit im Alter: Selbständigkeit erhalten, Gebrechlichkeit vorbeugen. MANZ’sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung GmbH, Wien (2017)
European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 460. Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life (2017). https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/communities/sites/jrccties/files/ebs_460_en.pdf
European Commission: Bericht der Kommission an das europäische Parlament, den Rat, den europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuss und den Ausschuss der Regionen über die Auswirkungen des demografischen Wandels. European Commission, Brüssel (2020)
European Commission: European Commission report on the impact of demographic change (2020). https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/demography_report_2020.pdf
Eurostat: Population structure and ageing (2015). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing#Further_Eurostat_informationeuropa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf
Fasola, J., Matarić, M.J.: Comparing physical and virtual embodiment in a socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. Center for Robotics and Embedded Systems, Los Angeles (2011)
Fasola, J., Matarić, M.J.: Using socially assistive human–robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proc. IEEE 100(8), 2512–2526 (2012)
Fasola, J., Matarić, M.J.: A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J. Hum. Robot Interaction 2(2), 3–32 (2013)
Federal Agency for Civic Education [bpb]: Altersstruktur und Bevölkerungsentwicklung (2018). https://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/europa/70503/altersstruktur#:~:text=Bezogen%20auf%20die%2028%20Staaten,auf%2028%2C5%20Prozent%20erh%C3%B6hen. Accessed 09 Aug 2020
Federal Statistical Office: Grad der Einschränkung in den Alltagsaktivitäten (ADL) (2019). https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kataloge-datenbanken/grafiken.assetdetail.8066066.html. Accessed 23 Jul 2020
Federal Statistical Office: Grad der Einschränkung in den instrumentellen Alltagsaktivitäten (IADL) (2019). https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/gesundheit/gesundheitszustand/alter.assetdetail.8066068.html. Accessed 23 Jul 2020
Federal Statistical Office: Künftige Bevölkderungsentwicklung der Schweiz und der Kantone 2020–2050. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik, Neuchâtel (2020)
Flandorfer, P.: Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int. J. Popul. Res. 829835 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/829835
Forsa. Politik- und Sozialforschung GmbH: Service-Robotik: Mensch-Technik-Interaktion im Alltag. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung. Berlin (2016). https://www.bmbf.de/files/BMBF_forsa_Robotik_FINAL2016.pdf
Füzéki, E., Banzer, W.: Bewegung und Gesundheit im Alter. In: Banzer, W. (ed.) Körperliche Aktivität und Gesundheit, pp. 139–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-50335-5_10
Gadde, P., Kharrazi, H., Patel, H., MacDorman, K.F.: Toward monitoring and increasing exercise adherence in older adults by robotic intervention: a proof of concept study. J. Robot. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/438514
Gschwind, Y.J., Pfenninger, B.: Training zur Sturzprävention. Bfu-Fachdokumentation 2.104. Beratungsstelle für Unfallverhütung, Bern (2016)
Guneysu Ozgur, A., et al.: Gamified motor training with tangible robots in older adults: a feasibility study and comparison with the young. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12, 59 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00059
Gunzelmann, T., Brähler, C., Hessel, A., Brähler, E.: Körpererleben im Alter. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie -psychiatrie 12(1), 40–54 (1999)
Haigh, E.A.P., Bogucki, O.E., Sigmon, S.T., Blazer, D.G.: Depression among older adults: a 20-year update on five common myths and misconceptions. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 26(1), 107–122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.06.011
Hedtke-Becker, A., Hoevels, R., Otto, U., Stumpp, G., Beck, S.: Zu Hause wohnen wollen bis zuletzt. In: Pohlmann, S. (ed.) Altern mit Zukunft, pp. 141–176, Springer, Wiesbaden (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19418-9_6
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Social Robot. 2(4), 361–375 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
Higgins, J.J.: An Introduction to Modern Nonparametric Statistics. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2004)
International Federation of Robotics: Service robots (2020). https://ifr.org/service-robots/. Accessed 23 Jun 2020
Kashi, S., Levy-Tzedek, S.: Smooth leader or sharp follower? Playing the mirror game with a robot. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 36(2), 147–159 (2018)
Krug, S., Jordan, S., Mensink, G.B.M., Müters, S., Finger, J.D., Lampert, T.: Körperliche Aktivität. Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt 56, 765–771 (2013)
Lebedeva, A., Steinert, A., Buchem, I., Merceron, A., Kreutel, J., Haesner, M.: Trainingskonzepte seniorengerecht und motivational entwickeln – Handlungsempfehlungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, vol. 8. AAL-Kongress, Frankfurt am Main (2015)
Lehmann, S., Hämmerle, V., Pauli, C., Misoch, S.: Partizipative Testung assistiver Technik. Das Konzept der Living Labs 65+ des IKOA-FHS. In: Friedrich, P., Fuchs, D. (eds.) 6. Ambient Medicine Forum. Assistive Technik für selbstbestimmtes Wohnen, pp. 103–107, Cuvillier, Göttingen (2019)
Lehmann, S., Ruf, E., Misoch, S.: Robot use for older adults – attitudes, wishes and concerns. first results from Switzerland. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) HCII 2020. CCIS, vol. 1226, pp. 64–70. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_9
Löllgen, H., Leyk, D.: Prävention durch Bewegung. Bedeutung der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit. Der Internist 53(6), 663–670 (2012)
Marek, K.D., Rantz, M.J.: Ageing in place: a new model for long-term care. Nurs. Adm. Q. 24(3), 1–11 (2000)
Martinez-Martin, E., Costa, A., Cazorla, M.: PHAROS 2.0-A PHysical Assistant RObot system improved. Sensors (Basel, Switz.) 19(20), 4531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204531
Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 1(2), Art. 20 (2000)
Mercay, C., Burla, L., Widmer, M.: Gesundheitspersonal in der Schweiz. Bestandesaufnahme und Prognosen bis 2030 (Obsan Bericht 71). Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium, Neuchâtel (2016)
Mercay, C., Grünig, A.: Gesundheitspersonal in der Schweiz – Zukünftiger Bedarf bis 2030 und die Folgen für den Nachwuchsbedarf (Obsan Bulletin 12/2016). Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium, Neuchâtel (2016)
Mies, C.: Akzeptanz von Smart Home Technologien: Einfluss von subjektivem Pflegebedarf und Technikerfahrung bei älteren Menschen. Untersuchung im Rahmen des Projekts «Accepting Smart Homes». Diplomarbeit, Wien (2011)
Misoch, S.: Qualitative Interviews. 2., erweiterte und aktualisierte Auflage. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin (2019)
Mori, M.: The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 33–35 (1970)
Mura, G.: Physical activity in depressed elderly. a systematic review. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 9, 125–135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901309010125
Müller, C., Lautenschläger, S., Voigt-Radloff, S.: Potential analysis for research on occupational therapy-led physical exercise programmes and home environment adaptation programmes to prevent falls for elderly people living at home. Int. J. Health Professions 3, 85–106 (2016)
Ng, T.P.: Old age depression: worse clinical course, brighter treatment prospects? Lancet Psychiatry 5(7), 533–534 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30186-X
Nitto, H., Taniyama, D., Inagaki, H.: Social acceptance and impact of robots and artificial intelligence. Findings of survey in Japan, the U.S. and Germany. Nomura Research Institute (NRI Papers, 211) (2017). https://www.nri.com/-/media/Corporate/en/Files/PDF/knowledge/report/cc/papers/2017/np2017211.pdf?la=en&hash=A730998FD55F6D58DF95F3479E3B709FC8EF83F4. Accessed 23 Jun 2020
Pilotto, A., Boi, R., Petermans, J.: Technology in geriatrics. Age Ageing 47(6), 771–774 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy026
Pro Senectute Homepage. https://www.prosenectute.ch. Accessed 06 Aug 2020
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A.M., et al.: Investigations on empathy towards humans and robots using fMRI. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 201–212 (2014)
Ruf, E., Lehmann, S., Misoch, S.: Motivating older adults to exercise at home: suitability of a humanoid robot. In: Guldemond, N., Ziefle, M., Maciaszek, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, pp. 113–120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009341001130120
Sankowski, O., Wollesen, B., Krause, D.: Ein methodischer Ansatz für die Entwicklung angepasster und altersgerechter Produkte am Beispiel einer Aufstehhilfe. In: Weidner, R., Redlich, T. (eds.) Erste Transdisziplinäre Konferenz zum Thema Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen, pp 66–77. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Hamburg (2014)
Satariano, W.A., Guralnik, J.M., Jackson, R.J., Marottoli, R.A., Phelan, E.A., Prohaska, T.R.: Mobility and aging: new directions for public health action. Am. J. Public Health 102(8), 1508–1515 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300631
Schaakxs, R., Comijs, H.C., Lamers, F., Kok, R.M., Beekman, A.T.F., Penninx, B.W.J.H.: Associations between age and the course of major depressive disorder: a 2-year longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 5(7), 581–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30166-4
Schneider, S., Kümmert, F.: Exercising with a humanoid companion is more effective than exercising alone. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 495–501 (2016)
Scholes, S., Mindell, J.: Physical activity in adults. Health Surv. Engl. 1(2), 1–49 (2012)
Schuch, F.B., et al.: Physical activity protects from incident anxiety: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Depression Anxiety 36(9), 846–858 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22915
Schuch, F.B., et al.: Physical activity and incident depression: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 175(7), 631–648 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111194
Schulz, R., Wahl, H.-W., Matthews, J.T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S.R., Czaja, S.J.: Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist 55(5), 724–734 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu071
Seifert, A., Meidert, U.: Quantified seniors. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 13, 353–360 (2018)
Senderovich, H., Tsai, P.M.: Do exercises prevent falls among older adults: Where are we now? A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Directors Assoc. Advance online publication (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.010
Shen, Z., Wu, Y.: Investigation of practical use of humanoid robots in elderly care centres. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, pp. 63–66 (2016)
Sherrington, C., et al.: Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 51, 1750–1758 (2016)
Sicher stehen – sicher gehen Homepage. https://www.sichergehen.ch. Accessed 06 Aug 2020
Stadelhofer, C.: Möglichkeiten und Chancen der Internetnutzung durch Ältere. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 33, 186–194 (2000)
Steinert, A., Haesner, M., Tetley, A., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E.: Nutzungsverhalten einer Gesundheitsapplikation zum Selbstmonitoring von Senioren. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 10(4), 281–286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-015-0510-5
Sun, F., Norman, I.J., While, A.E.: Physical activity in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 13, 449 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-449
Torta, E., Oberzaucher, J., Werner, F., Cuijpers, R.H., Juola, J.F.: Attitudes towards socially assistive robots in intelligent homes: results from laboratory studies and field trials. J. Hum.-Robot Interaction 1(2), 76–99 (2013)
Tully, M.A., et al.: Sedentary behaviour, physical activity and mental health in older adults: an isotemporal substitution model. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, Advance online publication (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13762
Vancea, M., Solé-Casals, J.: Population aging in the European information societies: towards a comprehensive research agenda in eHealth innovations for elderly. Aging Dis. 7(4), 526–539 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2015.1214
Vaupel, J.: Setting the stage: a generation of centenarians? Washington Q. 23(3), 197–200 (2000)
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
Voelcker-Rehage, C., Godde, B., Staudinger, U.M.: Bewegung, körperliche und geistige Mobilität im Alter. Gesundheitsschutz 49, 558–566 (2006)
Ware, J.E.: SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25, 3130–3139 (2000)
Weber, D., et al.: Gesundheit und Lebensqualität im Alter. Grundlagen für kantonale Aktionsprogramme «Gesundheitsförderung im Alter» (Bericht 5). Gesundheitsförderung Schweiz, Bern (2016)
Weidner, R., Redlich, T., Wulfsberg, J.P.:Technik, die die Menschn wollen. Unterstützungssysteme für Beruf und Alltag. In: Weidner, R., Redlich, T. (eds.) Erste Transdisziplinäre Konferenz zum Thema “Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen”, pp. 1–8, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Hamburg (2014)
Werner, F., Krainer, D., Oberzaucher, J., Werner, K.: Evaluation of the acceptance of a social assistive robot for physical training support together with older users and domain experts. Assistive Technol.: From Res. Pract.: AAATE 33, 137–142 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-304-9-137
Werner, F., Werner, K., Oberzaucher, J.: Evaluation of the acceptance of a socially assistive robot by older users within the project KSERA. In: Proceedings: Lebensqualität im Wandel von Demografie und Technik. Deutscher AAL-Kongress (2013)
World Health Organization.: World report on disability (2011). https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf
World Health Organization: Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020 (2013). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/94384/9789241506236_eng.pdf
World Health Organization.: World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization, Geneva (2015)
World Health Organization.: Management of physical health conditions in adults with severe mental disorders. WHO Guidelines (2018). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/275718/9789241550383-eng.pdf
Wullems, J.A., Verschueren, S.M.P., Degens, H., Morse, C.I., Onambélé, G.L.: A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures. Biogerontology 17(3), 547–565 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9640-1
Acknowledgements
We thank all study participants and Zoe Brack, who programmed the robot as part of her master thesis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ruf, E., Lehmann, S., Misoch, S. (2021). Use of a Socially Assistive Robot to Promote Physical Activity of Older Adults at Home. In: Ziefle, M., Guldemond, N., Maciaszek, L.A. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. ICT4AWE 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70807-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70807-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70806-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70807-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)