Abstract
Institutions around the world have sought to aggregate different cultural heritage data sources in order to provide society with comprehensive and useful services. This qualitative exploratory study presents a comparative analysis of two paradigmatic institutional aggregators, namely the Europeana Foundation in the European Union and the Digital Public Library of America in the United States. To that end, strategic aggregation documents were identified and quality policy elements analyzed and compared. As a result, nine quality-oriented data aggregation elements were selected: data providers; application process; metadata model; data exchange agreement; copyright license; call for applications; metadata use; technical criteria for data quality and data validation and publication. The elements identified and described are important in formulating processes that make it possible to aggregate digital cultural heritage collections from different Brazilian institutions and provide support for the solution currently being developed in collaboration with the Brazilian Institute of Museums (Ibram).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
IBRAM, Ibram Museums, http://www.museus.gov.br/os-museus/museus-ibram/, last accessed on 10/05/2020.
- 2.
Markup language to facilitate online information sharing.
- 3.
Protocol for collecting metadata records in repositories.
- 4.
CREATIVE COMMONS. CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication (2020), https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/, last accessed on 10/16/2020.
- 5.
LIBRARY OFCONGRESS. LC Name Authority File (LCNAF), https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names.html, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 6.
VIAF. The Virtual International Authority File, http://viaf.org/, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 7.
GETTY. Union List of Artist Names, https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/ulan/index.html, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 8.
VRA. Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), https://vraweb.org/resources/cataloging-cultural-objects/, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 9.
RDA. Resource Description and Access, https://www.rdatoolkit.org/about, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 10.
RBMS. Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials, http://rbms.info/dcrm/dcrmmss/, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 11.
LOD is a set of best practices for publishing and interlinking structured data on the web, establishing links between items from different sources to form a global data space (HEATH and BIZER, 2011 apud Santarém Segundo 2015).
- 12.
HISTORIANA. Historiana, https://historiana.eu/, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
- 13.
CLARIN. European Research Infrastructure for Language Resources and Technology, https://www.clarin.eu/, last accessed on 10/19/2020.
References
Abbas, J.: Structures for Organizing Knowledge: Exploring Taxonomies, Ontologies, and Other Schema. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York (2010)
Bardin, L.: Análise de Conteúdo. 3ª Reimpressão da 1, vol. 70. Edições, São Paulo (2016)
Charles, V., Isaac, A., Hill, T. (ed.): Discovery - User scenarios and their metadata requirements v3. Europeana Foundation (2015). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/EuropeanaTech/EuropeanaTech_WG/DataQualityCommittee/DQC_DiscoveryUserScenarios_v3.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
Clayphan, R., Charles, V., Isaac, A.: Europeana Data Model – Mapping Guidelines v2.3. Europeana Think Culture (2016). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Mapping_Guidelines_v2.3_112016.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
DPLA: about us (2020a). https://dp.la/about. Accessed 28 Sept 2020
DPLA: Becoming a Service Hub (2020b). https://pro.dp.la/prospective-hubs/becoming-a-service-hub. Accessed 05 Oct 2020.
DPLA: Collection Development Guidelines (2020c). https://pro.dp.la/hubs/collection-development-guidelines. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
DPLA: Documentation and Tools (2020d). https://pro.dp.la/hubs/documentation. Accessed 27 Sept 2020
DPLA: DPLA Data Exchange Agreement (2017a). https://digitalpubliclibraryofamerica.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/85406202/DataExchangeAgreement2017March.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1494427927703&cacheVersion=1&api=v2. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
DPLA: DPLA Geographic and Temporal Guidelinesfor MAP 3.1 (2017b). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b2iJI90I24hUp-8kCfnZhAQcefBt0vPUjMzhDn9HOZ0/edit#heading=h.s8e27gcgg4cl. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
DPLA: DPLA Metadata Quality Guidelines. Digital Public Library of America (2020i). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dITqEYEWsMX1a2pLPmkL78k1LN2b4im03spn8_QFscY/edit#heading=h.8lontuvk72d8. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
DPLA: DPLA Partners Crosswalk, MAP v4.0 (2020e). https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BzZvDOf4fgas3TD21xF40lu2pk2XW0k2pTGJKIt6438/edit#gid=1453046017. Accessed 12 Oct 2020
DPLA: DPLA Standardized Rights Statements Implementation Guidelines (2017c). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aInokOIIsgf-B4iMTXU33qYN5B2jA3s91KgWoh7DZ7Q/edit#heading=h.ma4e226diad0. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
DPLA: Our Hubs (2020f). https://pro.dp.la/hubs/our-hubs. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
DPLA: Partnering with DPLA Metadata (2020g). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gshwQ0Oj84l5q-_JxHo7wjyLeXln9lCg6SUtIMkPu_g/edit. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
DPLA: Portal Digital Public Library of America (2020h). https://dp.la/. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
DPLA. Hub Re-ingest Schedule (2021). https://digitalpubliclibraryofamerica.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CT/pages/84969744/Hub+Re-ingest+Schedule. Accessed 27 May 2021
Europeana: about us (2020a). https://www.europeana.eu/en/about-us. Accessed 28 Oct 2020
Europeana: Europeana Collections (2020b). https://www.europeana.eu/pt. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
Europeana Foundation: Europeana Data Exchange Agreement (2020). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Europeana%20Data%20Exchange%20Agreement.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2020
Europeana Foundation: the more you give, the more you get. Europeana Publishing Framework 2.0 (2019). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Publishing_Framework/Europeana%20Publishing%20Framework%20V2.0%20English.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2020
Europeana Pro: available rights statements (2015). https://pro.europeana.eu/page/available-rights-statements. Accessed 27 Sept 2020
Europeana Pro: Europeana Aggregators (2020a). https://pro.europeana.eu/page/aggregators. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
Europeana Pro: Europeana Foundation, About us (2020b). https://pro.europeana.eu/about-us/foundation#europeana-foundation. Accessed 28 Sept 2020
Europeana Pro: Share your data (2020c). https://pro.europeana.eu/share-your-data/process. Accessed 27 Sept 2020
Europeana Think Culture: Europeana Licensing Framework. Institute for Information Law, the Bibliothèque nationale de Luxembourg and Kennisland in cooperation with Europeana (2011). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Europeana%20Licensing%20Framework.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
GITHUB: Europeana - Metis Framework (2020). https://github.com/europeana/metis-framework. Accessed 12 Oct 2020
Gilliland, A.J.: Setting the stage. In: Baca, M. (ed.) Introduction to Metadata, 3 edn. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2016)
GOV.BR: Projeto Tainacan. Ministério do Turismo - Instituto Brasileiro de Museus (Ibram) (2020). https://www.museus.gov.br/acoes-e-programas/projeto-tainacan/. Accessed 12 Oct 2020
Gueguen, G., et al.: Metadata Application Profile, version 5.0. DPLA - Digital Public Library of America (2017). https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fJEWhnYy5Ch7_ef_-V48-FAViA72OieG/view. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
Kirsten, T., Kiel, A., Rühle, M., Wagner, J.: Metadata Management for Data Integration in Medical Sciences. Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web (2017). https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/627. Accessed 05 Oct 2020
Mannocci, A., Casarosa, V., Manghi, P., Zoppi, F.: The Europeana network of ancient Greek and Latin epigraphy data infrastructure. In: Closs, S., Studer, R., Garoufallou, E., Sicilia, M.-A. (eds.) MTSR 2014. CCIS, vol. 478, pp. 286–300. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13674-5_27
Medeiros e Sá, A., Ibañez Vila, A.B., Rodriguez Echavarria, K., Marroquim, R., Luiz Fonseca, V.: Accessible digitisation and visualisation of open cultural heritage assets. In: Selma, R., Karina, R.E. (eds.) Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association (2019). https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20191349
Miles, A., Zhao, J., Klyne, G., White-Cooper, H., Shotton, D.: OpenFlyData: an exemplar data web integrating gene expression data on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(5), 752–761 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.004
Potenziani, M., Callieri, M., Dellepiane, M., Scopigno, R.: Publishing and Consuming 3D Content on the Web: A Survey, vol. 10, no. 4. Foundations, Trends R in Computer Graphics, and Vision (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1561/0600000083
Santarem Segundo, J.E.: Web Semântica, Dados Ligados e Dados Abertos: Uma Visão dos Desafios do Brasil Frente às Iniciativas Internacionais. XVI Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (XVI ENANCIB) (2015). http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/article/download/43838. Accessed 17 Oct 2020
Scholz, H.: Europeana Publishing Guide v1.8. Europeana Foundation (2019). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Europeana%20Publishing%20Guide%20v1.8.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2020
Sczholz, H., et al.: Europeana Content Strategy. Europeana Foundation (2017). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Europeana%20Content%20Strategy.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
Scopigno, R., Callieri, M., Dellepiane, M., Ponchio, F., Potenziani, M.: Delivering and using 3D models on the web: are we ready? Virtual Archaeol. Rev. 8(17), 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.6405
Siqueira, J., & Martins, D. L.: Workflow models for aggregating cultural heritage data on the web: A systematic literature review. J. A. Inform. Sci. Tech. 1–21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24498
Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3 (2016). Article number: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Zeng, M., Qin, J.: Metadata, 2nd edn. ALA Neal-Schuman, Atlanta (2016)
Ziébelin, D., Hobus, K., Genoud, P., Bouveret, S.: Heterogeneous data integration using web of data technologies. In: Brosset, D., Claramunt, C., Li, X., Wang, T. (eds.) W2GIS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10181, pp. 35–47. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55998-8_3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siqueira, J., do Carmo, D., Martins, D.L., da Silva Lemos, D.L., Medeiros, V.N., de Oliveira, L.F.R. (2021). Elements for Constructing a Data Quality Policy to Aggregate Digital Cultural Collections: Cases of the Digital Public Library of America and Europeana Foundation. In: Bisset Álvarez, E. (eds) Data and Information in Online Environments. DIONE 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 378. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77417-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77417-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77416-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77417-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)