Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Coordinating Multi-party Vehicle Routing with Location Congestion via Iterative Best Response

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12802))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

This work is motivated by a real-world problem of coordinating B2B pickup-delivery operations to shopping malls involving multiple non-collaborative Logistics Service Providers (LSPs) in a congested city where space is scarce. This problem can be categorized as a Vehicle Routing Problem with Pickup and Delivery, Time Windows and Location Congestion with multiple LSPs (or ML-VRPLC in short), and we propose a scalable, decentralized, coordinated planning approach via iterative best response. We formulate the problem as a strategic game where each LSP is a self-interested agent but is willing to participate in a coordinated planning as long as there are sufficient incentives. Through an iterative best response procedure, agents adjust their schedules until no further improvement can be obtained to the resulting joint schedule. We seek to find the best joint schedule which maximizes the minimum gain achieved by any one LSP, as LSPs are interested in how much benefit they can gain rather than achieving a system optimality. We compare our approach to a centralized planning approach and our experiment results show that our approach is more scalable and is able to achieve on average 10% more gain within an operationally realistic time limit.

This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Corp Lab @ University scheme and Fujitsu Limited as part of the A*STAR-Fujitsu-SMU Urban Computing and Engineering Centre of Excellence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C.: From one to many: planning for loosely coupled multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, pp. 28–35 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Engel, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Planning games. In: IJCAI, pp. 73–78. Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, G.W.: Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. Activity Anal. Prod. Alloc. 13(1), 374–376 (1951)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Campos-Nañez, E., Garcia, A., Li, C.: A game-theoretic approach to efficient power management in sensor networks. Oper. Res. 56(3), 552–561 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C., Cheng, S.F., Lau, H.C.: Multi-agent orienteering problem with time-dependent capacity constraints. Web Intell. Agent Syst. Int. J. 12(4), 347–358 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuervo, D.P., Vanovermeire, C., Sörensen, K.: Determining collaborative profits in coalitions formed by two partners with varying characteristics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 70, 171–184 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai, B., Chen, H.: A multi-agent and auction-based framework and approach for carrier collaboration. Logist. Res. 3(2–3), 101–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0046-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Nijs, F., Spaan, M.T., de Weerdt, M.M.: Best-response planning of thermostatically controlled loads under power constraints. In: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gansterer, M., Hartl, R.F.: Collaborative vehicle routing: a survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 268(1), 1–12 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia, A., Reaume, D., Smith, R.L.: Fictitious play for finding system optimal routings in dynamic traffic networks. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 34(2), 147–156 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guajardo, M., Rönnqvist, M., Flisberg, P., Frisk, M.: Collaborative transportation with overlapping coalitions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 271(1), 238–249 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonsson, A., Rovatsos, M.: Scaling up multiagent planning: a best-response approach. In: Twenty-First International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lam, E., Hentenryck, P.V.: A branch-and-price-and-check model for the vehicle routing problem with location congestion. Constraints 21(3), 394–412 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-016-9241-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambert, T.J., Wang, H.: Fictitious play approach to a mobile unit situation awareness problem. Technical report, Univ. Michigan (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lambert Iii, T.J., Epelman, M.A., Smith, R.L.: A fictitious play approach to large-scale optimization. Oper. Res. 53(3), 477–489 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Y., Chen, H., Prins, C.: Adaptive large neighborhood search for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows, profits, and reserved requests. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(1), 27–38 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games Econ. Behav. 14(1), 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nazari, M., Oroojlooy, A., Takáč, M., Snyder, L.V.: Reinforcement learning for solving the vehicle routing problem. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 9861–9871 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nissim, R., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C.: A general, fully distributed multi-agent planning algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 1323–1330 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ropke, S., Cordeau, J.F.: Branch and cut and price for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transp. Sci. 43(3), 267–286 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ropke, S., Pisinger, D.: An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transp. Sci. 40(4), 455–472 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Torreño, A., Onaindia, E., Komenda, A., Štolba, M.: Cooperative multi-agent planning: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 50(6), 1–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, X., Kopfer, H.: Collaborative transportation planning of less-than-truckload freight. OR Spectr. 36(2), 357–380 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-013-0331-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y., Lei, L., Zhang, D., Lee, L.H.: Towards delivery-as-a-service: effective neighborhood search strategies for integrated delivery optimization of e-commerce and static O2O parcels. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 139, 38–63 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoong Chuin Lau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Joe, W., Lau, H.C. (2021). Coordinating Multi-party Vehicle Routing with Location Congestion via Iterative Best Response. In: Rosenfeld, A., Talmon, N. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12802. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82254-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82254-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82253-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82254-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics