Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Quality Assessment of Library Linked Data: a Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web (KGSWC 2021)

Abstract

The linked data principles provide an efficient way to interlink resources across several datasets, improving interoperability and discoverability. Several digital libraries around the world are publishing their legacy data from catalogs and authority files following the linked data principles. However, selecting the most suitable datasets for creating links between them is becoming a complex task due to most of them not having the proper data quality. In this paper, we evaluate the quality of data of the LinkedDL dataset. The results are compared to four other datasets in the state-of-the-art. The evaluation showed promising results in the accuracy, consistency, and accessibility metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://yhdelgado.github.io/linkeddl/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50816707.

  4. 4.

    https://data.infocientia.com/resource/journal/2307-2113.

  5. 5.

    https://linkeddatafragments.org/.

  6. 6.

    Google Colab.

References

  1. Agosti, M., Ferro, N., Silvello, G.: Digital library interoperability at high level of abstraction. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 55, 129–146 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X15003003

  2. Barroso, I., Hartmann, N., Ribeiro, C.: Metadata crosswalk for a museum collection in a thematic digital library. J. Libr. Metadata 15(1), 36–49 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1011025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - Design Issues (2006). https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

  4. Candela, G., Escobar, P., Carrasco, R.C., Marco-Such, M.: Evaluating the quality of linked open data in digital libraries. J. Inf. Sci., 0165551520930951 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520930951

  5. Candela, G., Escobar, P., Sáez, M.D., Marco-Such, M.: A shape expression approach for assessing the quality of linked open data in libraries. In: Semantic Web Preprint(Preprint), pp. 1–21. IOS Press, January 2021. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-210441. https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-web/sw210441

  6. Chen, Y.N.: A RDF-based approach to metadata crosswalk for semantic interoperability at the data element level. Library Hi Tech 33(2), 175–194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2014-0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Debattista, J., Auer, S., Lange, C.: Luzzu-A methodology and framework for linked data quality assessment. J. Data Inf. Qual. 8(1), 4:1–4:32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2992786

  8. Debattista, J., Lange, C., Auer, S., Cortis, D.: Evaluating the quality of the LOD cloud: an empirical investigation. Semant. Web 9(6), 859–901 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-180306. https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-web/sw306

  9. Färber, M., Bartscherer, F., Menne, C., Rettinger, A.: Linked data quality of DBpedia, freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. Semant. Web 9(1), 77–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hidalgo-Delgado, Y., Xu, B., Mariño-Molerio, A.J., Febles-Rodríguez, J.P., Leiva-Mederos, A.A.: A linked data-based semantic interoperability framework for digital libraries. Revista Cubana de Ciencias Informáticas 13(1), 14–30 (2019). https://rcci.uci.cu/?journal=rcci&page=article&op=view&path

  11. Khan, N.A., Shafi, S., Rizvi, S.Z.: Metadata crosswalks as a way towards interoperability. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 3rd edn., pp. 1834–1842. Data Mining and Databases. IGI Global (2015). https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/metadata-crosswalks-as-a-way-towards-interoperability/112589

  12. Martín, A., León, C., López, A.: Enhancing semantic interoperability in digital library by applying intelligent techniques. In: SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, pp. 904–911. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mecella, M., Scannapieco, M., Virgillito, A., Baldoni, R., Catarci, T., Batini, C.: Managing data quality in cooperative information systems. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519, pp. 486–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36124-3_28

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Radulovic, F., Mihindukulasooriya, N., García-Castro, R., Gómez-Pérez, A.: A comprehensive quality model for linked data. Semant. Web 9(1), 3–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170267. https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-web/sw267

  15. Shreeves, S.L., Knutson, E.M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C.L., Twidale, M.B., Cole, T.W.: Is quality metadata shareable metadata? The implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries (2005). https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/145. Accepted 2006-10-19T21:25:14Z

  16. Singh, T., Sharma, A.: Research work and changing dimensions of digital library. In: Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, pp. 39–42. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tallerås, K.: Quality of linked bibliographic data: the models, vocabularies, and links of data sets published by four national libraries. J. Libr. Metadata 17(2), 126–155 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1355166

  18. Villazón-Terrazas, B., Vilches-Blázquez, L.M., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Methodological guidelines for publishing government linked data. In: Wood, D. (ed.) Linking Government Data, pp. 27–49. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1767-5_2. http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/

  19. Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099

  20. Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., Auer, S.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semant. Web 7(1), 63–93 (2016). http://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-web/sw175

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their many insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusniel Hidalgo-Delgado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hidalgo-Delgado, Y., López, Y.A., Rodríguez, J.P.F., Mederos, A.L. (2021). Quality Assessment of Library Linked Data: a Case Study. In: Villazón-Terrazas, B., Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Tiwari, S., Goyal, A., Jabbar, M. (eds) Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web. KGSWC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1459. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91305-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91305-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91304-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91305-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics