Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Computer-Based (Scratch) and Robotic (Cozmo) Coding Instruction on Seventh Grade Students’ Computational Thinking, Competency Beliefs, and Engagement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13184))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this pre-/posttest quasi-experimental study was to examine the effects of coding activities supported by the emotional educational robot Cozmo on seventh grade students’ computational thinking, competency beliefs, and engagement compared to the computer-based program of Scratch. Two versions of the coding curriculum were developed that shared the same content and instructional features but differed in the code blocks used in each program. Two intact classes at a public middle school in the Midwestern United States participated in the study during the regularly scheduled Technology course. One class received the Scratch coding curriculum (n = 21), and the other class received the robotics coding curriculum (n = 22).

Results revealed non-significant posttest differences in computational thinking and competency beliefs among the Scratch and Cozmo interventions. However, students found Cozmo to be significantly more engaging than Scratch. Both interventions significantly improved students’ computational thinking and competency beliefs from pre- to posttest.

This study contributes to the emerging literature on coding education in a public school setting. The positive gains in the cognitive and affective domains of learning can serve as a point of reference for researchers, designers, and educators with the desire to introduce students to coding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carter, L.: Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. In: 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 27–31. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kong, S., Chiu, M.M., Lai, M.: A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Comput. Educ. 127, 178–189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tai, R., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., Fan, X.: Career choice: enhanced: planning early for careers in science. Science 312, 1143–1144 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Monroy-Hernández, A., Resnick, M.: Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions 15(2), 50–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y.B., Resnick, M., Rusk, N.: Programming by choice: urban youth learn programming with scratch. In: 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 367–371. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fields, D.A., Kafai, Y.B., Giang, M.T.: Youth computational participation in the wild. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 17(3), 1–22 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Armoni, M., Meerbaum-Salant, O., Ben-Ari, M.: From Scratch to “real” programming. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14(4), 1–15 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., Corral, L.: Leveraging robot programming to foster computational thinking. In: 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, vol. 2, CSEDU, pp. 109–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006310101090116

  9. Pachidis, T.P., Macedonia, E., Vrochidou, E., Kaburlasos, V., Macedonia, E.: Social robotics in education: state-of-the-art and directions. In: International Conference on Robotics, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosanda, V., Starčič, A.I.: A review of social robots in classrooms: emerging educational technoogy and teacher education. Educ. Self Dev. 14(3), 93–106 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anwar, S., Bascou, N.A., Menekse, M., Kardgar, A.: A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res. 9(2), 19–42 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papert, S., Harel, I.: Situating Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Julià, C., Antolí, J.Ò.: Spatial ability learning through educational robotics. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 26(2), 185–203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9307-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naneva, S., Sarda Gou, M., Webb, T.L., Prescott, T.J.: A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance and trust towards social robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12, 1179–1201 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Björling, E., Rose, E., Davidson, A., Ren, R., Wong, D.: Can we keep him forever? Teens’ engagement and desire for emotional connection with a social robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(1), 65–77 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3(21), 1–10 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davide, G., Pauline, C., Federica, F., Tiziana, P., Agnieszka, W.: Follow the white robot: efficacy of robot-assistive training for children with autism-spectrum condition. Soc. Cogn. Hum.-Robot Interact. 86, 101822 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keller, L., John, I.: Motivating female students for computer science by means of robot workshops. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 10(1), 94–108 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jovanovic, V.M., et al.: Exposing students to STEM careers through hands on activities with drones and robots. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szecsei, D.: Using storytelling and robot theater to develop computational thinking. In: Purdue University Symposium on Education in Entertainment and Engineering (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmad, M.I., Khordi-Moodi, M., Lohan, K.S.: Social robot for STEM education. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 90–92 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.C., Jiménez-Fernández, C.: Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 678–691 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Özüorçun, N.Ç., Bicen, H.: Does the inclusion of robots affect engineering students’ achievement in computer programming courses? Eurasia J. Math. Sci Technol. Educ. 13(8), 4779–4787 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pugnali, A., Sullivan, A.: The impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking. J. Inf. Techol. Educ. Innov. Pract. 16(16), 171–193 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hinton, T.B.: An exploratory study of a robotics educational platform on STEM career interests in middle school students. Diss. Abstr. Int. 78, 146 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weese, J.L., Feldhausen, R., Bean, N.H.: The impact of STEM experiences on student self-efficacy in computational thinking. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  28. Phetsrikran, T., Massagram, W., Harfield, A.: First steps in teaching computational thinking through mobile technology and robotics. Asian Int. J. Soc. Sci. 17(3), 37–52 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Witherspoon, E.B., Higashi, R.M., Schunn, C.D., Baehr, E.C., Shoop, R.: Developing computational thinking through a virtual robotics programming curriculum. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 18(1), 1–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Witherspoon, E.B., Schunn, C.D., Higashi, R.M., Shoop, R.: Attending to structural programming features predicts differences in learning and motivation. J. Comput. Assistaed Learn. 34(2), 115–128 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Merino-Armero, J.M., González-Calero, J.A., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., Villena-Taranilla, R.: Computational thinking initiation. An experience with robots in primary education. J. Res. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 1(2), 181–206 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brennan, K., Balch, C., Chung, M.: An introductory computing curriculum using Scratch. Harvard Graduate Sch. Educ. 154, 23–38 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, Y.-F., Cannady, M.A., Schunn, C., Dorph, R.: Measures technical brief: competency beliefs in STEM. Activiation Lab (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chung, J., Cannady, M.A., Schunn, C., Dorph, R., Bathgate, M.: Measures technical brief: engagement in science learning activities. Activation Lab (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Djambong, T., Freiman, V.: Task-based assessment of students’ computational thinking skills developed through visual programming or tangible coding environments. In: 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, Celda, pp. 41–51 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Merkouris, A., Chorianopoulos, K.: Introducing computer programming to children through robotic and wearable devices. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 69–72 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Plass, J.L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E.O., Homer, B.D., Um, E.: Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 128–140 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Poh, L., Toh, E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P.-W., Chen, I.-M., Yeo, S.H.: A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(2), 148–163 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA

    Shannon Smith, Elena Novak, Jason Schenker & Chia-Ling Kuo

Authors
  1. Shannon Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Novak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason Schenker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chia-Ling Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Jong-Hoon Kim

  2. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Madhusudan Singh

  3. Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Javed Khan

  4. Indian Institute of Information Technology, Allahabad, India

    Uma Shanker Tiwary

  5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Marigankar Sur

  6. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Dhananjay Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smith, S., Novak, E., Schenker, J., Kuo, CL. (2022). Effects of Computer-Based (Scratch) and Robotic (Cozmo) Coding Instruction on Seventh Grade Students’ Computational Thinking, Competency Beliefs, and Engagement. In: Kim, JH., Singh, M., Khan, J., Tiwary, U.S., Sur, M., Singh, D. (eds) Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. IHCI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98403-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98404-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation