Abstract
Platform moderation policies are described as a “black box” because the reasoning behind them has remained opaque to users. This study investigates how moderation is enacted in Facebook groups, which are user-created and voluntarily administered social media communities hosted by a global platform company. By exploring one part of the complex moderation structure of Facebook, the volunteer moderators of Facebook groups, this study aims to find out how their moderation strategies shape political debate on social media. What are their strategies for dealing with problematic content and how do these strategies support deliberation and autonomy of participants? This qualitative study is based on thematic interviews for 15 volunteer moderators of Finnish Facebook groups with focus on political and societal topics. Based on the findings, this article discusses the extent to which the public debate on social media, currently shaped by the affordances and design choices made by global platforms, serves the benefit of general audience who is seeking political information from social media.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, S.: Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(1), 62–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500519548
Bessi, A., et al.: Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225(10), 2047–2059 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-50319-0
Boulianne, S.: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(5), 524–538 (2015)
Choak, C.: Asking questions: Interviews and evaluations. In: Bradford, S., Cullen, F. (eds.) Research and Research Methods for Youth Practitioners, pp. 90–112. Routledge (2012)
Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)
Carpini, M.D., Cook, F.L., Jacobs, L.R.: Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 7(1), 315–344 (2004)
Ditrich, L., Sassenberg, K.: Kicking out the trolls – antecedents of social exclusion intentions in Facebook groups. Comp. in Hum. Beh. 75, 32–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.049
Ekman, M.: Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. Eur. J. Commun. 34(6), 606–618 (2019)
Esau, K., Friess, D., Eilders, C.: Design matters! an empirical analysis of online deliberation on different news platforms. Policy Internet 9(3), 321–342 (2017)
Esau, K., Fleuss, D., Nienhaus, S.M.: Different arenas, different deliberative quality? Using a systemic framework to evaluate online deliberation on immigration policy in Germany. Policy Internet 13(1), 86–112 (2021)
Fiesler, C., Feuston, J.L., Bruckman, A.S.: Understanding copyright law in online creative communities. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 116–129 (2015)
Gibson, A.: Safe spaces & Free speech: Effects of moderation policy on structures of online forum discussions. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)
Gibson, A.: Free speech and safe spaces: how moderation policies shape online discussion spaces. Social Media+ Society 5 1, 2056305119832588 (2019)
Gillespie, T.: Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press, New Haven (2018)
Goffman, E.: On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3), 213–231 (1955)
Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)
Halpern, D., Gibbs, J.: Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Comp. in Hum. Beh. 29(3), 1159–1168 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Jenkins, H.: Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press, New York (2006)
Jhaver, S., Appling, D.S., Gilbert, E., Bruckman, A.:“Did you suspect the post would be removed?” Understanding user reactions to content removals on Reddit. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3(CSCW), pp. 1–33 (2019)
Kalsnes, B., Ihlebaek, K.A.: Hiding hate speech: political moderation on Facebook. Media Cult. Soc. 43(2), 326–342 (2021)
Kruse, L.M., Norris, D.R., Flinchum, J.R.: Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. Sociol. Q. 59(1), 62–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Matias, J.N.: The civic labor of volunteer moderators online. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 2056305119836778 (2019)
Mouffe, C.: The democratic paradox. Verso, London, England (2000)
Mutz, D.C.: Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)
West, S.M.: Raging against the machine: Network gatekeeping and collective action on social media platforms. Media Commun. 5(3), 28–36 (2017)
Nikunen, K.: From irony to solidarity: affective practice and social media activism. Stud. Trans. States Soc. 10(2), 10–21 (2018)
Noveck, B.S.: Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (2009)
Roberts, S.T.: Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’ dirty work. Media Studies Publications 12 (2016). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/12
Ruckenstein, M., Turunen, L.L.M.: Re-humanizing the platform: content moderators and the logic of care. New Media Soc. 22(6), 1026–1042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819875990
Schradie J.: The digital production gap: the digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics 39(2), 145–168 (2011)
Seering, J., Wang, T., Yoon, J., Kaufman, G.: Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media Soc. 21(7), 1417–1443 (2019)
Terren, L., Borge, R.: Echo chambers on social media: a systematic review of the literature. Rev. Commun. Res. 9, 99–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028
Towne, W.B., Herbsleb, J.D.: Design considerations for online deliberation systems. J. Inform. Tech. Polit. 9(1), 97–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2011.637711
Wright, S., Street, J.: Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums. New Media Soc. 9(5), 849–869 (2007)
Warren, A.M., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N.I.: Facebook: The enabler of online civic engagement for activists. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32, 284–289 (2014)
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Emmi Lehtinen for her valuable help in the analysis of research data. This study was funded by Academy of Finland, decision number 321608.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Malinen, S. (2022). Moderation of Deliberation: How Volunteer Moderators Shape Political Discussion in Facebook Groups?. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05060-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05061-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)