Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Moderation of Deliberation: How Volunteer Moderators Shape Political Discussion in Facebook Groups?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13315))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Platform moderation policies are described as a “black box” because the reasoning behind them has remained opaque to users. This study investigates how moderation is enacted in Facebook groups, which are user-created and voluntarily administered social media communities hosted by a global platform company. By exploring one part of the complex moderation structure of Facebook, the volunteer moderators of Facebook groups, this study aims to find out how their moderation strategies shape political debate on social media. What are their strategies for dealing with problematic content and how do these strategies support deliberation and autonomy of participants? This qualitative study is based on thematic interviews for 15 volunteer moderators of Finnish Facebook groups with focus on political and societal topics. Based on the findings, this article discusses the extent to which the public debate on social media, currently shaped by the affordances and design choices made by global platforms, serves the benefit of general audience who is seeking political information from social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecht, S.: Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(1), 62–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500519548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bessi, A., et al.: Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225(10), 2047–2059 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-50319-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boulianne, S.: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(5), 524–538 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choak, C.: Asking questions: Interviews and evaluations. In: Bradford, S., Cullen, F. (eds.) Research and Research Methods for Youth Practitioners, pp. 90–112. Routledge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carpini, M.D., Cook, F.L., Jacobs, L.R.: Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 7(1), 315–344 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ditrich, L., Sassenberg, K.: Kicking out the trolls – antecedents of social exclusion intentions in Facebook groups. Comp. in Hum. Beh. 75, 32–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman, M.: Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. Eur. J. Commun. 34(6), 606–618 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Esau, K., Friess, D., Eilders, C.: Design matters! an empirical analysis of online deliberation on different news platforms. Policy Internet 9(3), 321–342 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Esau, K., Fleuss, D., Nienhaus, S.M.: Different arenas, different deliberative quality? Using a systemic framework to evaluate online deliberation on immigration policy in Germany. Policy Internet 13(1), 86–112 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiesler, C., Feuston, J.L., Bruckman, A.S.: Understanding copyright law in online creative communities. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 116–129 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson, A.: Safe spaces & Free speech: Effects of moderation policy on structures of online forum discussions. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson, A.: Free speech and safe spaces: how moderation policies shape online discussion spaces. Social Media+ Society 5 1, 2056305119832588 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gillespie, T.: Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press, New Haven (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goffman, E.: On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3), 213–231 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halpern, D., Gibbs, J.: Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Comp. in Hum. Beh. 29(3), 1159–1168 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins, H.: Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jhaver, S., Appling, D.S., Gilbert, E., Bruckman, A.:“Did you suspect the post would be removed?” Understanding user reactions to content removals on Reddit. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3(CSCW), pp. 1–33 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalsnes, B., Ihlebaek, K.A.: Hiding hate speech: political moderation on Facebook. Media Cult. Soc. 43(2), 326–342 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kruse, L.M., Norris, D.R., Flinchum, J.R.: Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. Sociol. Q. 59(1), 62–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matias, J.N.: The civic labor of volunteer moderators online. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 2056305119836778 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mouffe, C.: The democratic paradox. Verso, London, England (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mutz, D.C.: Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. West, S.M.: Raging against the machine: Network gatekeeping and collective action on social media platforms. Media Commun. 5(3), 28–36 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Nikunen, K.: From irony to solidarity: affective practice and social media activism. Stud. Trans. States Soc. 10(2), 10–21 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Noveck, B.S.: Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts, S.T.: Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’ dirty work. Media Studies Publications 12 (2016). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/12

  29. Ruckenstein, M., Turunen, L.L.M.: Re-humanizing the platform: content moderators and the logic of care. New Media Soc. 22(6), 1026–1042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819875990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schradie J.: The digital production gap: the digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics 39(2), 145–168 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seering, J., Wang, T., Yoon, J., Kaufman, G.: Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media Soc. 21(7), 1417–1443 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Terren, L., Borge, R.: Echo chambers on social media: a systematic review of the literature. Rev. Commun. Res. 9, 99–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Towne, W.B., Herbsleb, J.D.: Design considerations for online deliberation systems. J. Inform. Tech. Polit. 9(1), 97–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2011.637711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wright, S., Street, J.: Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums. New Media Soc. 9(5), 849–869 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Warren, A.M., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N.I.: Facebook: The enabler of online civic engagement for activists. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32, 284–289 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Emmi Lehtinen for her valuable help in the analysis of research data. This study was funded by Academy of Finland, decision number 321608.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanna Malinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Malinen, S. (2022). Moderation of Deliberation: How Volunteer Moderators Shape Political Discussion in Facebook Groups?. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05060-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05061-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics