Abstract
Online learning platforms conduct exams to evaluate the learners in a monotonous way, where the questions in the database may be classified into Bloom’s Taxonomy as varying levels in complexity from basic knowledge to advanced evaluation. The questions asked in these exams to all learners are very much static. It becomes important to ask new questions with different difficulty levels to each learner to provide a personalized learning experience. In this paper, we propose a multi-task method with an interactive attention mechanism, Qdiff, for jointly predicting Bloom’s Taxonomy and difficulty levels of academic questions. We model the interaction between the predicted bloom taxonomy representations and the input representations using an attention mechanism to aid in difficulty prediction. The proposed learning method would help learn representations that capture the relationship between Bloom’s taxonomy and difficulty labels. The proposed multi-task method learns a good input representation by leveraging the relationship between the related tasks and can be used in similar settings where the tasks are related. The results demonstrate that the proposed method performs better than training only on difficulty prediction. However, Bloom’s labels may not always be given for some datasets. Hence we soft label another dataset with a model fine-tuned to predict Bloom’s labels to demonstrate the applicability of our method to datasets with only difficulty labels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
We don’t disclose the identity of the source due to the anonymity requirement.
- 3.
Kinder-garden to grade-12.
References
Alsubait, T., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: A similarity-based theory of controlling MCQ difficulty. In: ICEEE 2013, pp. 283–288 (2013)
Benedetto, L., Aradelli, G., Cremonesi, P., Cappelli, A., Giussani, A., Turrin, R.: On the application of transformers for estimating the difficulty of multiple-choice questions from text. In: Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Online, pp. 147–157. ACL (April 2021)
Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. CoRR abs/1810.04805 (2018)
François, T., Miltsakaki, E.: Do NLP and machine learning improve traditional readability formulas? In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Predicting and Improving Text Readability for Target Reader Populations, Montréal, Canada. ACL (June 2012)
Gogus, A.: Bloom’s taxonomy of learning objectives, pp. 469–473 (2012)
Ha, L.A., Yaneva, V.: Automatic distractor suggestion for multiple-choice tests using concept embeddings and information retrieval. In: BEA (June 2018)
Howard, J., Ruder, S.: Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06146 (2018)
Liu, J., Wang, Q., Lin, C.Y., Hon, H.W.: Question difficulty estimation in community question answering services. In: Proceedings of the 2013 EMNLP, Seattle, Washington, USA. ACL (October 2013)
Nadeem, F., Ostendorf, M.: Language based mapping of science assessment items to skills. In: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Copenhagen, Denmark. ACL (September 2017)
Padó, U.: Question difficulty - how to estimate without norming, how to use for automated grading. In: BEA, Copenhagen, Denmark. ACL (September 2017)
Peters, M., et al.: Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the NAACL, Volume 1 (Long Papers). ACL (June 2018)
Ruder, S.: An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05098 (2017)
Smith, N.A., Heilman, M., Hwa, R.: Question generation as a competitive undergraduate course project. In: Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on the Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge, pp. 4–6 (2008)
Supraja, S., Hartman, K., Tatinati, S., Khong, A.W.H.: Toward the automatic labeling of course questions for ensuring their alignment with learning outcomes. In: EDM (2017)
Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)
Wang, Q., Liu, J., Wang, B., Guo, L.: A regularized competition model for question difficulty estimation in community question answering services. In: EMNLP 2014, pp. 1115–1126 (2014)
Xue, K., Yaneva, V., Runyon, C., Baldwin, P.: Predicting the difficulty and response time of multiple choice questions using transfer learning. In: BEA. ACL (July 2020)
Yaneva, V., Orăsan, C., Evans, R., Rohanian, O.: Combining multiple corpora for readability assessment for people with cognitive disabilities. In: BEA (September 2017)
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of Extramarks Education India Pvt. Ltd., SERB, FICCI (PM fellowship), Infosys Centre for AI and TiH Anubhuti (IIITD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Venktesh, V., Akhtar, M.S., Mohania, M., Goyal, V. (2022). Auxiliary Task Guided Interactive Attention Model for Question Difficulty Prediction. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)