Abstract
Many STEM problems involve visuals. To benefit from these problems, students need representational competencies: the ability to understand and appropriately use visuals. Support for representational competencies enhances students’ learning outcomes. However, it is infeasible to design representational-competency supports for entire curricula. This raises the question of whether these supports enhance future learning from novel problems. We addressed this question with an experiment with 120 undergraduates in an engineering class. All students worked with an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) that provided problems with interactive visual representations. The experiment varied which types of representational-competency supports the problems provided. We assessed future learning from a subsequent set of novel problems that involved a novel visual representation. Results show that representational-competency support can enhance future learning from the novel problems. We discuss implications for the integration of these supports in educational technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, S.: The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In: Gilbert, J.K., Reiner, M., Nakhleh, M. (eds.) Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. MMSE, vol. 3, pp. 191–208. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9
Kozma, R.: The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learn. Instr. 13, 205–226 (2003)
Gilbert, J.K.: Visualization: a metacognitive skill in science and science education. In: Gilbert, J.K. (ed.) Visualization in Science Education. MMSE, vol. 1, pp. 9–27. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
McCracken, W.M., Newstetter, W.C.: Text to diagram to symbol: representational transformations in problem-solving. In: 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37193), p. F2G-13 (2001)
diSessa, A.A.: Metarepresentation: native competence and targets for instruction. Cogn. Instr. 22, 293–331 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
Rau, M.A.: Conditions for the effectiveness of multiple visual representations in enhancing STEM learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29(4), 717–761 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9365-3
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M.A., Hegarty, M.: Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cogn. Sci. 31, 549–579 (2007)
Hegarty, M., Waller, D.A.: Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Stieff, M.: Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learn. Instr. 17, 219–234 (2007)
Rau, M.A.: A framework for educational technologies that support representational competencies. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10, 290–305 (2017)
Steiner, S., Wagaman, M.A., Lal, P.: Thinking spatially: teaching an undervalued practice skill. J. Teach. Soc. Work 34, 427–442 (2014)
Levine, S.C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S.F., Newcombe, N.S., Huttenlocher, J.: Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychol. Sci. 16, 841–845 (2005)
Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Charles, P.: The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36, 757–798 (2012)
Bodemer, D., Faust, U.: External and mental referencing of multiple representations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22, 27–42 (2006)
Ainsworth, S.: DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr. 16, 183–198 (2006)
Berthold, K., Eysink, T.H.S., Renkl, A.: Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instr. Sci. 37, 345–363 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z
Goldstone, R.L., Landy, D.H., Son, J.Y.: The education of perception. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2, 265–284 (2010)
Kellman, P.J., Massey, C.M.: Perceptual learning, cognition, and expertise. In: Ross, B.H. (ed.) Psychology of Learning and Motivation, pp. 117–165. Academic Press (2013)
Schwartz, D.L., Martin, T.: Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cogn. Instr. 22, 129–184 (2004)
Hohensee, C.: Transfer of Learning: Progressive Perspectives for Mathematics Education and Related Fields. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65632-4
Bransford, J., Schwartz, D.: Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications, vol. 24. American Educational Research Association, Washington DC (1999)
Lobato, J.: How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer andviceversa. Educ. Res. 32, 17–20 (2003)
Cromley, J.G., Perez, T.C., Fitzhugh, S.L., Newcombe, N.S., Wills, T.W., Tanaka, J.C.: Improving students’ diagram comprehension with classroom instruction. J. Exp. Educ. 81, 511–537 (2013)
Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., Glaser, R.: Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn. Sci. 5, 121–152 (1981)
Arcavi, A.: The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 52, 215–241 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077
Chin, J.M., Schooler, J.W.: Why do words hurt? Content, process, and criterion shift accounts of verbal overshadowing. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 396–413 (2008)
Rau, M.A.: Sequencing support for sense making and perceptual induction of connections among multiple visual representations. J. Educ. Psychol. 110, 811 (2018)
Van Gog, T., Paas, F.: Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educ. Psychol. 43, 16–26 (2008)
Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., Richardson, C.: A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test - different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn. 28, 39–58 (1995)
Sorby, S.A., Baartmans, B.J.: The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. J. Eng. Educ. 89, 301–307 (2000)
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press (2013)
Schnotz, W.: An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, vol. 49, no. 69 (2005)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSF DUE 1933078. We also thank Bernie Lesieutre and his teaching assistants for their help with our study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rho, J., Rau, M.A., Van Veen, B.D. (2022). Preparing Future Learning with Novel Visuals by Supporting Representational Competencies. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)