Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Preparing Future Learning with Novel Visuals by Supporting Representational Competencies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13355))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4657 Accesses

Abstract

Many STEM problems involve visuals. To benefit from these problems, students need representational competencies: the ability to understand and appropriately use visuals. Support for representational competencies enhances students’ learning outcomes. However, it is infeasible to design representational-competency supports for entire curricula. This raises the question of whether these supports enhance future learning from novel problems. We addressed this question with an experiment with 120 undergraduates in an engineering class. All students worked with an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) that provided problems with interactive visual representations. The experiment varied which types of representational-competency supports the problems provided. We assessed future learning from a subsequent set of novel problems that involved a novel visual representation. Results show that representational-competency support can enhance future learning from the novel problems. We discuss implications for the integration of these supports in educational technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ainsworth, S.: The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In: Gilbert, J.K., Reiner, M., Nakhleh, M. (eds.) Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. MMSE, vol. 3, pp. 191–208. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozma, R.: The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learn. Instr. 13, 205–226 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert, J.K.: Visualization: a metacognitive skill in science and science education. In: Gilbert, J.K. (ed.) Visualization in Science Education. MMSE, vol. 1, pp. 9–27. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. McCracken, W.M., Newstetter, W.C.: Text to diagram to symbol: representational transformations in problem-solving. In: 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37193), p. F2G-13 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. diSessa, A.A.: Metarepresentation: native competence and targets for instruction. Cogn. Instr. 22, 293–331 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rau, M.A.: Conditions for the effectiveness of multiple visual representations in enhancing STEM learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29(4), 717–761 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9365-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M.A., Hegarty, M.: Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cogn. Sci. 31, 549–579 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hegarty, M., Waller, D.A.: Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Stieff, M.: Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learn. Instr. 17, 219–234 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rau, M.A.: A framework for educational technologies that support representational competencies. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10, 290–305 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steiner, S., Wagaman, M.A., Lal, P.: Thinking spatially: teaching an undervalued practice skill. J. Teach. Soc. Work 34, 427–442 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levine, S.C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S.F., Newcombe, N.S., Huttenlocher, J.: Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychol. Sci. 16, 841–845 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Charles, P.: The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36, 757–798 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodemer, D., Faust, U.: External and mental referencing of multiple representations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22, 27–42 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ainsworth, S.: DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr. 16, 183–198 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berthold, K., Eysink, T.H.S., Renkl, A.: Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instr. Sci. 37, 345–363 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstone, R.L., Landy, D.H., Son, J.Y.: The education of perception. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2, 265–284 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kellman, P.J., Massey, C.M.: Perceptual learning, cognition, and expertise. In: Ross, B.H. (ed.) Psychology of Learning and Motivation, pp. 117–165. Academic Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz, D.L., Martin, T.: Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cogn. Instr. 22, 129–184 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hohensee, C.: Transfer of Learning: Progressive Perspectives for Mathematics Education and Related Fields. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65632-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Bransford, J., Schwartz, D.: Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications, vol. 24. American Educational Research Association, Washington DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lobato, J.: How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer andviceversa. Educ. Res. 32, 17–20 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cromley, J.G., Perez, T.C., Fitzhugh, S.L., Newcombe, N.S., Wills, T.W., Tanaka, J.C.: Improving students’ diagram comprehension with classroom instruction. J. Exp. Educ. 81, 511–537 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., Glaser, R.: Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn. Sci. 5, 121–152 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arcavi, A.: The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 52, 215–241 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chin, J.M., Schooler, J.W.: Why do words hurt? Content, process, and criterion shift accounts of verbal overshadowing. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 396–413 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rau, M.A.: Sequencing support for sense making and perceptual induction of connections among multiple visual representations. J. Educ. Psychol. 110, 811 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Gog, T., Paas, F.: Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educ. Psychol. 43, 16–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., Richardson, C.: A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test - different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn. 28, 39–58 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sorby, S.A., Baartmans, B.J.: The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. J. Eng. Educ. 89, 301–307 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schnotz, W.: An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, vol. 49, no. 69 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSF DUE 1933078. We also thank Bernie Lesieutre and his teaching assistants for their help with our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihyun Rho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rho, J., Rau, M.A., Van Veen, B.D. (2022). Preparing Future Learning with Novel Visuals by Supporting Representational Competencies. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics