Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Efficient Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for nnU-Net

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022 (MICCAI 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13438))

Abstract

The self-configuring nnU-Net has achieved leading performance in a large range of medical image segmentation challenges. It is widely considered as the model of choice and a strong baseline for medical image segmentation. However, despite its extraordinary performance, nnU-Net does not supply a measure of uncertainty to indicate its possible failure. This can be problematic for large-scale image segmentation applications, where data are heterogeneous and nnU-Net may fail without notice. In this work, we introduce a novel method to estimate nnU-Net uncertainty for medical image segmentation. We propose a highly effective scheme for posterior sampling of weight space for Bayesian uncertainty estimation. Different from previous baseline methods such as Monte Carlo Dropout and mean-field Bayesian Neural Networks, our proposed method does not require a variational architecture and keeps the original nnU-Net architecture intact, thereby preserving its excellent performance and ease of use. Additionally, we boost the segmentation performance over the original nnU-Net via marginalizing multi-modal posterior models. We applied our method on the public ACDC and M &M datasets of cardiac MRI and demonstrated improved uncertainty estimation over a range of baseline methods. The proposed method further strengthens nnU-Net for medical image segmentation in terms of both segmentation accuracy and quality control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/Challenge/acdc.

  2. 2.

    https://www.ub.edu/mnms.

References

  1. Baumgartner, C.F., Tezcan, K.C., Chaitanya, K., Hötker, A.M., Muehlematter, U.J., Schawkat, K., Becker, A.S., Donati, O., Konukoglu, E.: PHiSeg: capturing uncertainty in medical image segmentation. In: Shen, D., Liu, T., Peters, T.M., Staib, L.H., Essert, C., Zhou, S., Yap, P.-T., Khan, A. (eds.) MICCAI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11765, pp. 119–127. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard, O., et al.: Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(11), 2514–2525 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blei, D.M., Kucukelbir, A., McAuliffe, J.D.: Variational inference: a review for statisticians. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 112(518), 859–877 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., Wierstra, D.: Weight uncertainty in neural network. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1613–1622. PMLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campello, V.M., et al.: Multi-centre, multi-vendor and multi-disease cardiac segmentation: the M &MS challenge. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40(12), 3543–3554 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Folgoc, L.L., et al.: Is MC dropout bayesian? arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04286 (2021)

  7. Fort, S., Hu, H., Lakshminarayanan, B.: Deep ensembles: a loss landscape perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02757 (2019)

  8. Fuchs, M., Gonzalez, C., Mukhopadhyay, A.: Practical uncertainty quantification for brain tumor segmentation (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gal, Y., Ghahramani, Z.: Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059. PMLR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez, C., Gotkowski, K., Bucher, A., Fischbach, R., Kaltenborn, I., Mukhopadhyay, A.: Detecting when pre-trained nnU-Net models fail silently for Covid-19 lung lesion segmentation. In: de Bruijne, M., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2021. LNCS, vol. 12907, pp. 304–314. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez, C., Mukhopadhyay, A.: Self-supervised out-of-distribution detection for cardiac CMR segmentation. In: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., Weinberger, K.Q.: On calibration of modern neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1321–1330. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, G., Li, Y., Pleiss, G., Liu, Z., Hopcroft, J.E., Weinberger, K.Q.: Snapshot ensembles: train 1, get M for free. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00109 (2017)

  14. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Izmailov, P., Podoprikhin, D., Garipov, T., Vetrov, D., Wilson, A.G.: Averaging weights leads to wider optima and better generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05407 (2018)

  16. Jungo, A., Reyes, M.: Assessing reliability and challenges of uncertainty estimations for medical image segmentation. In: Shen, D., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11765, pp. 48–56. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kohl, S.A., et al.: A probabilistic U-Net for segmentation of ambiguous images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05034 (2018)

  18. Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., Blundell, C.: Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01474 (2016)

  19. Maddox, W.J., Izmailov, P., Garipov, T., Vetrov, D.P., Wilson, A.G.: A simple baseline for Bayesian uncertainty in deep learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mandt, S., Hoffman, M.D., Blei, D.M.: Stochastic gradient descent as approximate Bayesian inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04289 (2017)

  21. Mehrtash, A., Wells, W.M., Tempany, C.M., Abolmaesumi, P., Kapur, T.: Confidence calibration and predictive uncertainty estimation for deep medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39(12), 3868–3878 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mingard, C., Valle-Pérez, G., Skalse, J., Louis, A.A.: Is SGD a Bayesian sampler? well, almost. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ovadia, Y., et al.: Can you trust your model’s uncertainty? Evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02530 (2019)

  24. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge TU Delft AI Initiative for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Tao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, Y., Yang, C., Schweidtmann, A., Tao, Q. (2022). Efficient Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for nnU-Net. In: Wang, L., Dou, Q., Fletcher, P.T., Speidel, S., Li, S. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022. MICCAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16452-1_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16452-1_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16451-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16452-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics