Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Discourse Markers as the Classificatory Factors of Speech Acts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chinese Computational Linguistics (CCL 2022)

Abstract

Since the debut of the speech act theory, the classification standards of speech acts have been in dispute. Traditional abstract taxonomies seem insufficient to meet the needs of artificial intelligence for identifying and even understanding speech acts. To facilitate the automatic identification of the communicative intentions in human dialogs, scholars have tried some data-driven methods based on speech-act annotated corpora. However, few studies have objectively evaluated those classification schemes. In this regard, the current study applied the frequencies of the eleven discourse markers (oh, well, and, but, or, so, because, now, then, I mean, and you know) proposed by Schiffrin [24] to investigate whether they can be effective indicators of speech act variations. The results showed that the five speech acts of Agreement can be well classified in terms of their functions by the frequencies of discourse markers. Moreover, it was found that the discourse markers well and oh are rather efficacious in differentiating distinct speech acts. This paper indicates that quantitative indexes can reflect the characteristics of human speech acts, and more objective and data-based classification schemes might be achieved based on these metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For all the clustering results using different methods and distance metrics, see Appendix A.

References

  1. Allen, J., Core, M.: Draft of DAMSL: dialog act markup in several layers (1997). http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/ling/ss07/discourse-materials/DAMSL97.pdf

  2. Anthony, L.: Antconc 4.0.5. Waseda University (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ariel, M.: Discourse markers and form-function correlations. In: Jucker, A.H., Ziv, Y. (eds.) Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, pp. 223–260. John Benjamins, Philadelphia (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Carletta, J.: Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comput. Linguist. 22(2), 249–254 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J.C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A.H.: The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Comput. Linguist. 23(1), 13–31 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Andrade, R.G., Wish, M.: Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior. Discourse Process. 8(2), 229–259 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, K.: Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: the functional polysemy of discourse particles. In: Fischer, K. (ed.) Approaches to Discourse Particles, pp. 427–447. Elsevier, Oxford (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser, B.: Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2), 167–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. FurkĂł, P.B.: Discourse Markers and Beyond: Descriptive and Critical Perspectives on Discourse-Pragmatic Devices Across Genres and Languages. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37763-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewitt, L.E., Duchan, J.F., Segal, E.M.: Structure and function of verbal conflicts among adults with mental retardation. Discourse Process. 16(4), 525–543 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holtgraves, T.: The production and perception of implicit performatives. J. Pragmat. 37(12), 2024–2043 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs, S., Jackson, S.: Argument as a natural category: the routine grounds for arguing in conversation. W. Jo. Speech Commun. 45(2), 118–132 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318109374035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jucker, A.H.: The discourse marker well: a relevance-theoretical account. J. Pragmat. 19(5), 435–452 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, L., Biasca, D.: Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation coders manual, draft 13 (1997). https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/ws97/manual.august1.html

  15. Labov, W., Fanshel, D.: Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. Academic Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, S.: An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts. J. Pragmat. 43(6), 1801–1817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matei, M.: Discourse markers as functional elements. Bull. Transilvania Univ. Braşov 3(52), 119–126 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McHugh, M.L.: Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Med. 22(3), 276–282 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulkay, M.: Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters. Text - Interdisc. J. Study Discourse 5(3), 201–228 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Potts, C.: Switchboard Dialog Act Corpus with Penn Treebank links (2022). https://github.com/cgpotts/swda

  21. Redeker, G.: Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions running head: discourse transitions. In: Fischer, K. (ed.) Approaches to Discourse Particles, pp. 339–358. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands (2006). https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_019

  22. Scheflen, A.E.: Stream and Structure of Communicational Behavior: Context Analysis of a Psychotherapy Session. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Philadelphia (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scheflen, A.E.: On the structuring of human communication. Am. Behav. Sci. 10(8), 8–12 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764201000803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schiffrin, D.: Discourse Markers. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Searle, J.R.: A classification of illocutionary acts. Lang. Soc. 5(1), 1–23 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Trimboli, C., Walker, M.B.: Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 20(4), 297–311 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(84)90027-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the three anonymous reviewers for providing helpful feedback on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitao Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A. The Clustering Results of the Frequencies of Discourse Markers in the Speech Acts of Agreement

Appendix A. The Clustering Results of the Frequencies of Discourse Markers in the Speech Acts of Agreement

(See Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
figure 3

The clustering results of the frequencies of DMs in the speech acts of Agreement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qi, D., Zhou, C., Liu, H. (2022). Discourse Markers as the Classificatory Factors of Speech Acts. In: Sun, M., et al. Chinese Computational Linguistics. CCL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13603. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18315-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18315-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18314-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18315-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics