Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Automated Extraction and Representation of Citation Network: A CJEU Case-Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2022)

Abstract

Although with some discrepancy, both in common law and in civil law systems, previous judgments play an important role with respect to future decisions. Traditional legal methodologies usually involve the use of manual rather than automatic keyword search mechanisms to retrace the steps of the judicial decision-making. However, these methods are generally highly time-consuming and can be subject to different types of biases. In this work, we present an automated extraction pipeline to map and structure citations in rulings regarding fiscal state aids in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. In particular, by exploiting the available XML data in the EUR-Lex platform, we built an end-to-end parser based on a set of regular expressions and heuristics, which is able to iteratively extract all citations, finally creating a hierarchical structure of citations with their contextual information at the paragraph level. Such data structure can be projected into a graphical representation, enabling useful visualization and exploration features and insights, such as the diachronic study of the development of specific citations and legal principles over time. Our work suggests how the exploitation and analysis of citation networks through automated means can provide significant tools to support traditional legal methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu.

References

  1. Adedjouma, M., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L.C.: Automated detection and resolution of legal cross references: approach and a study of luxembourg’s legislation. In: 2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 63–72. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bach, N.X., Thuy, N.T.T., Chien, D.B., Duy, T.K., Hien, T.M., Phuong, T.M.: Reference extraction from vietnamese legal documents. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 486–493 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., Bourcier, D.: Network approach to the French system of legal codes part ii: the role of the weights in a network. Artif. Intell. Law 26(1), 23–47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9204-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30(1–7), 107–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, L.N., Kennedy, T.: The Court of Justice of the European Communities. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Civitarese, S.: A European convergence towards a stare decisis model. Rev. Digit. de Derecho Admin. 14, 173 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Maat, E., Winkels, R., Van Engers, T.: Automated detection of reference. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: In: JURIX 2006 the 19th Annual Conference, vol. 152, p. 41. IOS Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Derlén, M., Lindholm, J.: Goodbye van gend en loos, hello bosman? using network analysis to measure the importance of individual CJEU judgments. Eur. Law J. 20(5), 667–687 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Derlén, M., Lindholm, J.: Is it good law? network analysis and the CJEU’s internal market jurisprudence. J. Int. Econ. Law 20(2), 257–277 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fowler, J.H., Johnson, T.R., Spriggs, J.F., Jeon, S., Wahlbeck, P.J.: Network analysis and the law: measuring the legal importance of precedents at the U.S. supreme court. Polit. Anal. 15(3), 324–346 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamdaqa, M., Hamou-Lhadj, A.: An approach based on citation analysis to support effective handling of regulatory compliance. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 27(4), 395–410 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2010.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harasta, J., Savelka, J.: Toward linking heterogenous references in czech court decisions to content. In: JURIX, pp. 177–182 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koopmans, T.: Stare decisis in European law. Essays Eur. Law Integr, pp. 1957–1982 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Langone, D., Fulloni, A., Wonsever, D.: A citations network for legal decisions. In: New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leitner, E., Rehm, G., Moreno-Schneider, J.: Fine-grained named entity recognition in legal documents. In: Acosta, M., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Maleshkova, M., Pellegrini, T., Sack, H., Sure-Vetter, Y. (eds.) SEMANTiCS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11702, pp. 272–287. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33220-4_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen, H.P., Küçüksu, A.: Finding hidden patterns in ecthr’s case law: on how citation network analysis can improve our knowledge of ecthr’s article 14 practice. Int. J. Discrimination Law 17(1), 4–22 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmirani, M., Brighi, R., Massini, M.: Automated extraction of normative references in legal texts. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 105–106 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Publication Office, E.U.: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/formex/

  19. Sadeghian, A., Sundaram, L., Wang, D., Hamilton, W., Branting, K., Pfeifer, C.: Semantic edge labeling over legal citation graphs. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Text, Document, and Corpus Analytics (LTDCA-2016), pp. 70–75 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sadeghian, A., Sundaram, L., Wang, D.Z., Hamilton, W.F., Branting, K., Pfeifer, C.: Automatic semantic edge labeling over legal citation graphs. Artif. Intell. Law 26(2), 127–144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9217-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadl, U., Tarissan, F.: The relevance of the network approach to European case law. reflexion and evidence. In: New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice (2020). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03098351

  22. Schön, W.: Tax legislation and the notion of fiscal aid: a review of 5 years of European jurisprudence. In: Richelle, I., Schön, W., Traversa, E. (eds.) State Aid Law and Business Taxation. MSTLPF, vol. 6, pp. 3–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53055-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Sulis, E., Humphreys, L., Vernero, F., Amantea, I.A., Audrito, D., Caro, L.D.: Exploiting co-occurrence networks for classification of implicit inter-relationships in legal texts. Inf. Syst. 106, 101821 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sulis, E., Humphreys, L.B., Audrito, D., Di Caro, L.: Exploiting textual similarity techniques in harmonization of laws. In: Bandini, S., Gasparini, F., Mascardi, V., Palmonari, M., Vizzari, G. (eds.) AIxIA 2021 - Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 185–197. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Opijnen, M.: Citation analysis and beyond: in search of indicators measuring case law importance. In: JURIX, vol. 250, pp. 95–104 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winkels, R., de Ruyter, J.: Survival of the fittest: network analysis of dutch supreme court cases. In: Palmirani, M., Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G. (eds.) AICOL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7639, pp. 106–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Audrito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sartor, G., Santin, P., Audrito, D., Sulis, E., Di Caro, L. (2022). Automated Extraction and Representation of Citation Network: A CJEU Case-Study. In: Guizzardi, R., Neumayr, B. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13650. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22036-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22036-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22035-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22036-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics