Abstract
Mixed reality as a tool for teaching has made only limited use of its possibilities so far. However, it brings a plethora of new opportunities, with benefits ranging from interactivity to more vividness. These factors could improve numerous areas of teaching. The mining sector would benefit from new methods combined with mixed reality especially. Therefore, the MiReBooks project was launched: Various applications have been developed that can vividly present content using 3D models, virtual field trips and other methods. To verify and further improve these tools, an evaluation phase was conducted. During two test lectures in distance learning, a total of 23 participants answered a posttest questionnaire. The results showed that the teaching quality could be maintained well by the mixed reality application even in distance learning. Students were satisfied with the methods used, attributed good usability to the tool, and felt integrated into the classroom. At the same time, the team realized that the quality of the lesson depends heavily on the quality of the materials and the expertise of the lecturer. It also became clear that other factors, such as the technical infrastructure and support, are particularly important in this format.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kommetter, C., Ebner, M.: A pedagogical framework for mixed reality in classrooms based on a literature review. In: Theo Bastiaens, J. (ed.) Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning, pp. 901–911. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Amsterdam, Netherlands (2019)
Kalkofen, D., Mori, S., Ladinig, T., Daling, L.: Tools for teaching mining student in virtual reality based on 360° video experiences. In: IEEE VR Fifth Workshop on K-12+ Embodied Learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality, Atlanta, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00096
Wagner, H.: How to address the crisis of mining engineering education in the western world? Mineral Resour. Eng. 8(4), 471–481 (1999)
Galvin, J., Roxborough, F.: Mining engineering education in the 21st century – will universities still be relevant? In: The AusIMM Annual Conference Ballarat (1997)
Thurner, S., Daling, L., Ebner, M., Ebner, M., Schön, S.: Evaluation design for learning with mixed reality in mining education based on a literature review. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12785, pp. 313–325. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77943-6_21
Daling, L., Kommetter, C., Abdelrazeq, A., Ebner, M., Ebner, M.: Mixed reality books: applying augmented and virtual reality in mining engineering education. In: Geroimenko, V. (ed.) Augmented Reality in Education. SSCC, pp. 185–195. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_10
Dede, C.J., Jacobson, J., Richards, J.: Introduction: virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In: Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R., Richards, J. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education. SCI, pp. 1–16. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_1
Sternig, C., Spitzer, M., Ebner, M.: Learning in a virtual environment: implementation and evaluation of a VR math-game. In: Virtual and Augmented Reality: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pp. 1288–1312. IGI Global (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5469-1.ch062
Schiffeler, N., Stehling, V., Haberstroh, M., Isenhardt, I.: Collaborative augmented reality in engineering education. In: Auer, M.E., Ram B., K. (eds.) REV2019 2019. LNNS, vol. 80, pp. 719–732. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23162-0_65
Granic, A., Nakic, J., Marangunic, N.: Scenario-based group usability testing as a mixed methods approach to the evaluation of three-dimensional virtual-learning environments. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 58(3), 616–639 (2020)
Mellet-d’Huart, D.: Virtual reality for training and lifelong learning. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 2(1–2), 185–224 (2012)
Daling, L., et al.: Evaluation of mixed reality technologies in remote teaching. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) HCII 2022, vol. 13329, pp. 24–37. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05675-8_3
Brooke, J.: Sus: a quick and dirty usability. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(3) (1996)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 319–340 (1989)
Kuckartz, U.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (Qualitative content analysis: methods, practice, computer support), 3rd edn. Beltz, Weinheim Basel (2016)
Huk, T.: Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 22(6), 392–404 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00180.x
Acknowledgements
This work is part of the project “Mixed Reality Books (MiReBooks)” and was funded by the EIT RAW Materials. The authors are responsible for the contents of this publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thurner, S., Schön, S., Ebner, M., Leitner, P., Daling, L. (2023). Perceived Effects of Mixed Reality in Distance Learning for the Mining Education Sector. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34549-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34550-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)