Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Analysis and Validation of the Reliability and Validity of the Flow Ergonomics Scale (FES-45): Study on Mindfulness Meditation of Animation Employees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Design (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14024))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the past, our team improved the first version of the Flow Ergonomics (FE) Scale (FES) and proposed the FES-45 version. The scale after reducing the number of questions was not used in the actual test. Therefore, the research team will conduct the test with practitioners from different industries. The research will validate the model again and confirm whether the correlation between categories is consistent. In order to further verify the effectiveness of the model, this study will use FES-45 to test the animation employees, and use SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 22.0 to analyze the data. The questionnaire collected 100 valid questionnaires and tested their reliability and validity. In this paper, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are carried out respectively, and the reliability of the results of the grounded theory is verified by structural equation model. The study considers that the model of FE is reasonable, and the improved scale of FES-45 is more effective; The number of deleted questions will not make the subjects feel too much when filling in, and will reduce the fatigue and discomfort caused by filling in too long.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Waddell, G., Burton, A.K.: Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maslow, A.H.: Toward a humanistic biology. Am. Psychol. 24(8), 724 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koltko-Rivera, M.E.: Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 10(4), 302–317 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia-Romeu, A.: Self-transcendence as a measurable transpersonal construct. J. Transpers. Psychol. 42(1), 26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lotan, G., Tanay, G., Bernstein, A.: Mindfulness and distress tolerance: relations in a mindfulness preventive intervention. Int. J. Cogn. Ther. 6(4), 371–385 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play- San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., Van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., Schaufeli, W.B.: Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: a review of spirituality questionnaires. J. Relig. Health 51, 336–354 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., Oishi, S.: Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and life satisfaction. Handb. Positive Psychol. 2, 63–73 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garfield, A.M., Drwecki, B.B., Moore, C.F., Kortenkamp, K.V., Gracz, M.D.: The Oneness beliefs scale: connecting spirituality with pro-environmental behavior. J. Sci. Study Relig. 53(2), 356–372 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiou, W.-K., Liu, C., Chen, H., Hsu, S.-E.: Reliability and validity assessment of the Chinese version of flow ergonomics. Paper presented at the cross-cultural design. interaction design across cultures. In: 14th International Conference, CCD 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26–July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part I (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peifer, C., Engeser, S.: Theoretical Integration and Future Lines of Flow Research. In: Advances in Flow Research, pp. 417–439. Springer, Cham (2021)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperPerennial, New York 39, 1–16 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norsworthy, C., Jackson, B., Dimmock, J.A.: Advancing our understanding of psychological flow: a scoping review of conceptualizations, measurements, and applications. Psychol. Bull. 147(8), 806 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivkin, W., Diestel, S., Schmidt, K.H.: Which daily experiences can foster well-being at work? a diary study on the interplay between flow experiences, affective commitment, and self-control demands. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 23(1), 99 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirao, K., Kobayashi, R., Okishima, K., Tomokuni, Y.: Flow experience and health-related quality of life in community dwelling elderly Japanese. Nurs. Health Sci. 14(1), 52–57 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salanova, M., Bakker, A.B., Llorens, S.: Flow at work: evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. J. Happiness Stud. 7(1), 1–22 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Demerouti, E., Mäkikangas, A.: What predicts flow at work? theoretical and empirical perspectives. In: Flow at Work, pp. 66–80. Routledge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peifer, C., Schulz, A., Schächinger, H., Baumann, N., Antoni, C.H.: The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress—can u shape it? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 53, 62–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Engeser, S., Baumann, N.: Fluctuation of flow and affect in everyday life: a second look at the paradox of work. J. Happiness Stud. 17, 105–124 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakker, A.B.: Flow among music teachers and their students: the crossover of peak experiences. J. Vocat. Behav. 66(1), 26–44 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Šimleša, M., Guegan, J., Blanchard, E., Tarpin-Bernard, F., Buisine, S.: The flow engine framework: a cognitive model of optimal human experience. Europe’s J. Psychol. 14(1), 232–253 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bakker, A.B., Van Woerkom, M.: Flow at work: a self-determination perspective. Occup. Health Sci. 1, 47–65 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peifer, C., Schächinger, H., Engeser, S., Antoni, C.H.: Cortisol effects on flow-experience. Psychopharmacology 232(6), 1165–1173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3753-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peifer, C., Zipp, G.: All at once? the effects of multitasking behavior on flow and subjective performance. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 28(5), 682–690 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tims, M., Bakker, A.B., Derks, D.: Development and validation of the job crafting scale. J. Vocat. Behav. 80(1), 173–186 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peifer, C., Syrek, C., Ostwald, V., Schuh, E., Antoni, C.H.: Thieves of flow: how unfinished tasks at work are related to flow experience and wellbeing. J. Happiness Stud. 21, 1641–1660 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peifer, C., et al.: The symphony of team flow in virtual teams. using artificial intelligence for its recognition and promotion. Front. Psychol. 12, 697093 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fritz, B.S., Avsec, A.: The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students. Horiz. Psychol. 16(2), 5–17 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dul, J., et al.: A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics 55(4), 377–395 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Holden, R.J., et al.: SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 56(11), 1669–1686 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ware, J.E., Jr., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.D.: A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care 34, 220–233 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E., Jr., Lu, J.R., Sherbourne, C.D.: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med. Care 32, 40–66 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brazier, J.E., et al.: Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br. Med. J. 305(6846), 160–164 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.: SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A User’s Manual, 1994 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bakker, A.B.: The work-related flow inventory: construction and initial validation of the WOLF. J. Vocat. Behav. 72(3), 400–414 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Demerouti, E.: Job characteristics, flow, and performance: the moderating role of conscientiousness. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 11(3), 266 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Csikszentmihalyi, M., LeFevre, J.: Optimal experience in work and leisure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56(5), 815 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In: Flow and the foundations of positive psychology, pp. 209–226. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Bakker, A.B., Geurts, S.A.: Toward a dual-process model of work-home interference. Work. Occup. 31(3), 345–366 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Szu-Erh Hsu , Hao Chen , Chao Liu , Po-Chen Shen or Wen-Ko Chiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hsu, SE., Chen, H., Liu, C., Shen, PC., Chiou, WK. (2023). Analysis and Validation of the Reliability and Validity of the Flow Ergonomics Scale (FES-45): Study on Mindfulness Meditation of Animation Employees. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14024. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35946-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35946-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35945-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35946-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics