Abstract
In the past, our team improved the first version of the Flow Ergonomics (FE) Scale (FES) and proposed the FES-45 version. The scale after reducing the number of questions was not used in the actual test. Therefore, the research team will conduct the test with practitioners from different industries. The research will validate the model again and confirm whether the correlation between categories is consistent. In order to further verify the effectiveness of the model, this study will use FES-45 to test the animation employees, and use SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 22.0 to analyze the data. The questionnaire collected 100 valid questionnaires and tested their reliability and validity. In this paper, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are carried out respectively, and the reliability of the results of the grounded theory is verified by structural equation model. The study considers that the model of FE is reasonable, and the improved scale of FES-45 is more effective; The number of deleted questions will not make the subjects feel too much when filling in, and will reduce the fatigue and discomfort caused by filling in too long.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Waddell, G., Burton, A.K.: Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? (2006)
Maslow, A.H.: Toward a humanistic biology. Am. Psychol. 24(8), 724 (1969)
Koltko-Rivera, M.E.: Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 10(4), 302–317 (2006)
Garcia-Romeu, A.: Self-transcendence as a measurable transpersonal construct. J. Transpers. Psychol. 42(1), 26 (2010)
Lotan, G., Tanay, G., Bernstein, A.: Mindfulness and distress tolerance: relations in a mindfulness preventive intervention. Int. J. Cogn. Ther. 6(4), 371–385 (2013)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play- San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (1975)
de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., Van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., Schaufeli, W.B.: Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: a review of spirituality questionnaires. J. Relig. Health 51, 336–354 (2012)
Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., Oishi, S.: Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and life satisfaction. Handb. Positive Psychol. 2, 63–73 (2002)
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988)
Garfield, A.M., Drwecki, B.B., Moore, C.F., Kortenkamp, K.V., Gracz, M.D.: The Oneness beliefs scale: connecting spirituality with pro-environmental behavior. J. Sci. Study Relig. 53(2), 356–372 (2014)
Chiou, W.-K., Liu, C., Chen, H., Hsu, S.-E.: Reliability and validity assessment of the Chinese version of flow ergonomics. Paper presented at the cross-cultural design. interaction design across cultures. In: 14th International Conference, CCD 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26–July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part I (2022)
Peifer, C., Engeser, S.: Theoretical Integration and Future Lines of Flow Research. In: Advances in Flow Research, pp. 417–439. Springer, Cham (2021)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperPerennial, New York 39, 1–16 (1997)
Norsworthy, C., Jackson, B., Dimmock, J.A.: Advancing our understanding of psychological flow: a scoping review of conceptualizations, measurements, and applications. Psychol. Bull. 147(8), 806 (2021)
Rivkin, W., Diestel, S., Schmidt, K.H.: Which daily experiences can foster well-being at work? a diary study on the interplay between flow experiences, affective commitment, and self-control demands. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 23(1), 99 (2018)
Hirao, K., Kobayashi, R., Okishima, K., Tomokuni, Y.: Flow experience and health-related quality of life in community dwelling elderly Japanese. Nurs. Health Sci. 14(1), 52–57 (2012)
Salanova, M., Bakker, A.B., Llorens, S.: Flow at work: evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. J. Happiness Stud. 7(1), 1–22 (2006)
Demerouti, E., Mäkikangas, A.: What predicts flow at work? theoretical and empirical perspectives. In: Flow at Work, pp. 66–80. Routledge (2017)
Peifer, C., Schulz, A., Schächinger, H., Baumann, N., Antoni, C.H.: The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress—can u shape it? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 53, 62–69 (2014)
Engeser, S., Baumann, N.: Fluctuation of flow and affect in everyday life: a second look at the paradox of work. J. Happiness Stud. 17, 105–124 (2016)
Bakker, A.B.: Flow among music teachers and their students: the crossover of peak experiences. J. Vocat. Behav. 66(1), 26–44 (2005)
Šimleša, M., Guegan, J., Blanchard, E., Tarpin-Bernard, F., Buisine, S.: The flow engine framework: a cognitive model of optimal human experience. Europe’s J. Psychol. 14(1), 232–253 (2018)
Bakker, A.B., Van Woerkom, M.: Flow at work: a self-determination perspective. Occup. Health Sci. 1, 47–65 (2017)
Peifer, C., Schächinger, H., Engeser, S., Antoni, C.H.: Cortisol effects on flow-experience. Psychopharmacology 232(6), 1165–1173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3753-5
Peifer, C., Zipp, G.: All at once? the effects of multitasking behavior on flow and subjective performance. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 28(5), 682–690 (2019)
Tims, M., Bakker, A.B., Derks, D.: Development and validation of the job crafting scale. J. Vocat. Behav. 80(1), 173–186 (2012)
Peifer, C., Syrek, C., Ostwald, V., Schuh, E., Antoni, C.H.: Thieves of flow: how unfinished tasks at work are related to flow experience and wellbeing. J. Happiness Stud. 21, 1641–1660 (2020)
Peifer, C., et al.: The symphony of team flow in virtual teams. using artificial intelligence for its recognition and promotion. Front. Psychol. 12, 697093 (2021)
Fritz, B.S., Avsec, A.: The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students. Horiz. Psychol. 16(2), 5–17 (2007)
Dul, J., et al.: A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics 55(4), 377–395 (2012)
Holden, R.J., et al.: SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 56(11), 1669–1686 (2013)
Ware, J.E., Jr., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.D.: A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care 34, 220–233 (1996)
McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E., Jr., Lu, J.R., Sherbourne, C.D.: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med. Care 32, 40–66 (1994)
Brazier, J.E., et al.: Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br. Med. J. 305(6846), 160–164 (1992)
Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.: SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A User’s Manual, 1994 (2001)
Bakker, A.B.: The work-related flow inventory: construction and initial validation of the WOLF. J. Vocat. Behav. 72(3), 400–414 (2008)
Demerouti, E.: Job characteristics, flow, and performance: the moderating role of conscientiousness. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 11(3), 266 (2006)
Csikszentmihalyi, M., LeFevre, J.: Optimal experience in work and leisure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56(5), 815 (1989)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In: Flow and the foundations of positive psychology, pp. 209–226. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_14
Bakker, A.B., Geurts, S.A.: Toward a dual-process model of work-home interference. Work. Occup. 31(3), 345–366 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hsu, SE., Chen, H., Liu, C., Shen, PC., Chiou, WK. (2023). Analysis and Validation of the Reliability and Validity of the Flow Ergonomics Scale (FES-45): Study on Mindfulness Meditation of Animation Employees. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14024. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35946-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35946-0_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35945-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35946-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)