Abstract
In an industrial setting, predicting the remaining useful life-time of equipment and systems is crucial for ensuring efficient operation, reducing downtime, and prolonging the life of costly assets. There are state-of-the-art machine learning methods supporting this task. However, in this paper, we argue, that both efficiency and understandability can be improved by the use of explainable AI methods that analyze the importance of features used by the machine learning model. In the paper, we analyze the feature importance before a failure occurs to identify events in which an increase in importance can be observed and based on that indicate attributes with the most influence on the failure. We demonstrate how the analyses of Shap values near the occurrence of failures can help identify the specific features that led to the failure. This in turn can help in identifying the root cause of the problem and developing strategies to prevent future failures. Additionally, it can be used to identify areas where maintenance or replacement is needed to prevent failure and prolong the useful life of a system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baldi, P.: Autoencoders, unsupervised learning, and deep architectures. In: Guyon, I., Dror, G., Lemaire, V., Taylor, G., Silver, D. (eds.) Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 27, pp. 37–49. PMLR, Bellevue, Washington, USA (02 Jul 2012). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v27/baldi12a.html
Bank, D., Koenigstein, N., Giryes, R.: Autoencoders (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05991
Basora, L., Olive, X., Dubot, T.: Recent advances in anomaly detection methods applied to aviation. Aerospace 6(11) 2226–4310 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6110117, https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/6/11/117
Bentéjac, C., Csörgo, A., Martínez-Muñoz, G.: A comparative analysis of xgboost. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01914 (2019)
Chalapathy, R., Chawla, S.: Deep learning for anomaly detection: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.03407 (2019)
Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.02754 (2016)
Chen, Z., Yeo, C., Lee, B.S., Lau, C.T.: Autoencoder-based network anomaly detection. In: 2018 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS), pp. 1–5 (2018)
Isermann, R.: Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis - status and applications. Ann. Rev. Control 29(1), 71–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2004.12.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578805000052
Jakubowski, J., Stanisz, P., Bobek, S., Nalepa, G.J.: Anomaly detection in asset degradation process using variational autoencoder and explanations. Sensors 22(1), 291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010291, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/1/291
Juodelyte, D., Cheplygina, V., Graversen, T., Bonnet, P.: Predicting bearings degradation stages for predictive maintenance in the pharmaceutical industry. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 3107–3115 (2022)
Kaiser, K., Gebraeel, N.: Predictive maintenance management using sensor-based degradation models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 39, 840–849 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2016429
Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874 (2017)
Mehdi, G., Naderi, D., Ceschini, G.F., Roshchin, M.: Model-based reasoning approach for automated failure analysis : An industrial gas turbine application (2015). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2015.v7i1.2719
Molnar, C.: Interpretable Machine Learning (2022). https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book
Principi, E., Rossetti, D., Squartini, S., Piazza, F.: Unsupervised electric motor fault detection by using deep autoencoders. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 6(2), 441–451 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2019.1911393
Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation, pp. 318–362. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)
Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., Eklund, N.: Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In: 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, pp. 1–9 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414
Sen, P.C., Hajra, M., Ghosh, M.: Supervised classification algorithms in machine learning: a survey and review. In: Mandal, J.K., Bhattacharya, D. (eds.) Emerging Technology in Modelling and Graphics, pp. 99–111. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2020)
Acknowledgements
This paper is funded from the XPM (Explainable Predictive Maintenance) project funded by the National Science Center, Poland under CHIST-ERA programme Grant Agreement No. \(857925 (NCN UMO-2020/02/Y/ST6/00070)\)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kuk, M., Bobek, S., Veloso, B., Rajaoarisoa, L., Nalepa, G.J. (2023). Feature Importances as a Tool for Root Cause Analysis in Time-Series Events. In: Mikyška, J., de Mulatier, C., Paszynski, M., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2023. ICCS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14077. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36030-5_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36030-5_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36029-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36030-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)