Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Abstract

Rigorous and interactive class discussions that support students to engage in high-level thinking and reasoning are essential to learning and are a central component of most teaching interventions. However, formally assessing discussion quality ‘at scale’ is expensive and infeasible for most researchers. In this work, we experimented with various modern natural language processing (NLP) techniques to automatically generate rubric scores for individual dimensions of classroom text discussion quality. Specifically, we worked on a dataset of 90 classroom discussion transcripts consisting of over 18000 turns annotated with fine-grained Analyzing Teaching Moves (ATM) codes and focused on four Instructional Quality Assessment (IQA) rubrics. Despite the limited amount of data, our work shows encouraging results in some of the rubrics while suggesting that there is room for improvement in the others. We also found that certain NLP approaches work better for certain rubrics.

Supported by a grant from the Learning Engineering Tools Competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We tried different ratios and 60% provides the best results.

References

  1. Beltagy, I., Peters, M.E., Cohan, A.: Longformer: The long-document transformer. arXiv:2004.05150 (2020)

  2. Correnti, R., Matsumura, L.C., Walsh, M., Zook-Howell, D., Bickel, D.D., Yu, B.: Effects of online content-focused coaching on discussion quality and reading achievement: Building theory for how coaching develops teachers’ adaptive expertise. Read. Res. Q. 56(3), 519–558 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of ACL: Human Language Technologies, pp. 4171–4186, Minneapolis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, Z., Xu, W., Yu, K.: Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging. CoRR arXiv: abs/1508.01991 (2015)

  5. Jacobs, J., Scornavacco, K., Harty, C., Suresh, A., Lai, V., Sumner, T.: Promoting rich discussions in mathematics classrooms: Using personalized, automated feedback to support reflection and instructional change. Teach. Teach. Educ. 112, 103631 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsumura, L.C., Garnier, H.E., Slater, S.C., Boston, M.D.: Toward measuring instructional interactions “at-scale’’. Educ. Assess. 13(4), 267–300 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Olshefski, C., Lugini, L., Singh, R., Litman, D., Godley, A.: The Discussion Tracker corpus of collaborative argumentation. In: Language Resources & Evaluation (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suresh, A., et al.: Using AI to promote equitable classroom discussions: The TalkMoves application. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 344–348 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nhat Tran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tran, N., Pierce, B., Litman, D., Correnti, R., Matsumura, L.C. (2023). Utilizing Natural Language Processing for Automated Assessment of Classroom Discussion. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics