Abstract
Teachers using Open Educational Resource (OER) repositories face the challenge of searching and selecting learning resources (LRs) that match their pedagogical goals and teaching preferences. However, teachers are often overwhelmed by the multitude of LRs in such repositories. One way of aiding teachers is providing them with search mechanisms that rely on semantic information describing different properties of the materials, and peer-generated reviews and feedback (‘social recommendations’). Previous studies of teachers’ search and select strategies in such systems were usually conducted in controlled settings, limiting their generalization to real-life contexts. The literature also lacks systematic evaluations of the usefulness of semantic information and social recommendations to teachers’ search processes. To address these gaps, we conducted a study with physics teachers who use a nation-wide blended-learning environment containing an OER repository and social network features. We applied a mixed-method approach, first interviewing teachers and observing them performing authentic search tasks, and then triangulating these findings with quantitative analysis of log files containing data about teacher interaction with the learning environment. Our findings demonstrate the value that teachers ascribe to social-based information, especially from peers who are perceived as credible or like-minded, when searching and selecting LRs. We discuss possible implications for stake-holders and designers of OER repositories for blended instruction in K-12 environments.
The work of EY was partially supported by the Israeli Council for Higher Education via the Weizmann Data Science Research Center. GA’s research was generously supported by the Estate of Emile Mimran and by the Maurice and Vivienne Wohl Biology Endowment. The authors wish to thank Dr. Moriah Ariely for her assistance with the qualitative part of this research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
A full list of all filters used, in descending order, can be found in https://shorturl.at/sIP18.
References
Abramovich, S., Schunn, C.D.: Studying teacher selection of resources in an ultra-large scale interactive system: does metadata guide the way? Comput. Educ. 58(1), 551–559 (2012)
Abramovich, S., Schunn, C.D., Correnti, R.J.: The role of evaluative metadata in an online teacher resource exchange. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 61(6), 863–883 (2013)
Anderson, T., Whitelock, D.: The educational semantic web: Visioning and practicing the future of education. J. Interactive Media Educ. (2004)
Carlson, B., Reidy, S.: Effective access: Teachers’ use of digital resources (research in progress). OCLC Syst. Serv. Int. Digital Library Perspectives 20(2), 65–70 (2004)
Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., Manouselis, N.: Open educational resources repositories literature review-towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 1098–1106 (2015)
Committee, I.L.T.S., et al.: Learning object metadata (2002). http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/
Cooper, J., Olsher, S., Yerushalmy, M.: Didactic metadata informing teachers’ selection of learning resources: boundary crossing in professional development. J. Math. Teacher Educ. 23(4), 363–384 (2020)
Diekema, A.R., Olsen, M.W.: Personal information management practices of teachers. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 48(1), 1–10 (2011)
Diekema, A.R., Olsen, M.W.: The notion of relevance in teacher information behavior. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–9 (2012)
Doush, I.A., Alkhateeb, F., Maghayreh, E.A., Alsmadi, I., Samarah, S.: Annotations, collaborative tagging, and searching mathematics in e-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.1780 (2012)
Downes, S.: Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary J. E-Learning Learn. Objects 3(1), 29–44 (2007)
Dutton, K.: Increasing diversity, awareness, and inclusion in corporate culture: investigating communities of practice and resource groups among employees. Dev. Learn. Organizations Int. J. 32, 19–21 (2018)
Gueudet, G., Trouche, L.: Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educ. Stud. Math. 71, 199–218 (2009)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Intelligent tutors as teachers’ aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp. 257–266 (2017)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-ai complementarity. Grantee Submission (2019)
Koper, R.: Use of the semantic web to solve some basic problems in education: Increase flexible, distributed lifelong learning; decrease teacher’s workload. J. Interact. Media Educ. 2004(1), 1–23 (2004)
Li, Q., Baker, R., Warschauer, M.: Using clickstream data to measure, understand, and support self-regulated learning in online courses. Internet High. Educ. 45, 100727 (2020)
Nazaretsky, T., Bar, C., Walter, M., Alexandron, G.: Empowering teachers with ai: co-designing a learning analytics tool for personalized instruction in the science classroom. In: LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 1–12 (2022)
Quentin, I., Bruillard, É.: Explaining internal functioning of online teacher networks: between personal interest and depersonalized collective production, between the sandbox and the hive. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 2627–2634. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2013)
Recker, M., Dorward, J., Dawson, D., Mao, X., Liu, Y., Palmer, B., Halioris, S., Park, J.: Teaching, designing, and sharing: a context for learning objects. Interdisc. J. E-Learning Learn. Objects 1(1), 197–216 (2005)
Recker, M.M., Dorward, J., Nelson, L.M.: Discovery and use of online learning resources: case study findings. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 7(2), 93–104 (2004)
Recker, M.M., Walker, A., Lawless, K.: What do you recommend? implementation and analyses of collaborative information filtering of web resources for education. Instr. Sci. 31(4), 299–316 (2003)
Regalla, M., Davies, A., Grissom, D., Losavio, A.: Classroom to communities of practice: benefits for English learners and teacher candidates through partnerships. Multicult. Perspect. 20(1), 25–32 (2018)
Shelton, B.E., Duffin, J., Wang, Y., Ball, J.: Linking open course wares and open education resources: creating an effective search and recommendation system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 1(2), 2865–2870 (2010)
Siedel, H., Stylianides, A.J.: Teachers’ selection of resources in an era of plenty: An interview study with secondary mathematics teachers in England. Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues, pp. 119–144 (2018)
Speer, N.M.: Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educ. Stud. Math. 58, 361–391 (2005)
Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., Studer, R.: elearning based on the semantic web. In: WebNet2001-World Conference on the WWW and Internet, pp. 23–27. Citeseer (2001)
Weibel, S.L., Koch, T.: The dublin core metadata initiative. D-lib magazine 6(12), 1082–9873 (2000)
Wenger, E., et al.: Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Syst. Thinker 9(5), 2–3 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yacobson, E., Alexandron, G. (2023). How Do Teachers Search for Learning Resources? A Mixed Method Field Study. In: Viberg, O., Jivet, I., Muñoz-Merino, P., Perifanou, M., Papathoma, T. (eds) Responsive and Sustainable Educational Futures. EC-TEL 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42681-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42682-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)