Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

How Do Teachers Search for Learning Resources? A Mixed Method Field Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Responsive and Sustainable Educational Futures (EC-TEL 2023)

Abstract

Teachers using Open Educational Resource (OER) repositories face the challenge of searching and selecting learning resources (LRs) that match their pedagogical goals and teaching preferences. However, teachers are often overwhelmed by the multitude of LRs in such repositories. One way of aiding teachers is providing them with search mechanisms that rely on semantic information describing different properties of the materials, and peer-generated reviews and feedback (‘social recommendations’). Previous studies of teachers’ search and select strategies in such systems were usually conducted in controlled settings, limiting their generalization to real-life contexts. The literature also lacks systematic evaluations of the usefulness of semantic information and social recommendations to teachers’ search processes. To address these gaps, we conducted a study with physics teachers who use a nation-wide blended-learning environment containing an OER repository and social network features. We applied a mixed-method approach, first interviewing teachers and observing them performing authentic search tasks, and then triangulating these findings with quantitative analysis of log files containing data about teacher interaction with the learning environment. Our findings demonstrate the value that teachers ascribe to social-based information, especially from peers who are perceived as credible or like-minded, when searching and selecting LRs. We discuss possible implications for stake-holders and designers of OER repositories for blended instruction in K-12 environments.

The work of EY was partially supported by the Israeli Council for Higher Education via the Weizmann Data Science Research Center. GA’s research was generously supported by the Estate of Emile Mimran and by the Maurice and Vivienne Wohl Biology Endowment. The authors wish to thank Dr. Moriah Ariely for her assistance with the qualitative part of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://stwww1.weizmann.ac.il/petel/en/home-en/.

  2. 2.

    A full list of all filters used, in descending order, can be found in https://shorturl.at/sIP18.

References

  1. Abramovich, S., Schunn, C.D.: Studying teacher selection of resources in an ultra-large scale interactive system: does metadata guide the way? Comput. Educ. 58(1), 551–559 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramovich, S., Schunn, C.D., Correnti, R.J.: The role of evaluative metadata in an online teacher resource exchange. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 61(6), 863–883 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, T., Whitelock, D.: The educational semantic web: Visioning and practicing the future of education. J. Interactive Media Educ. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson, B., Reidy, S.: Effective access: Teachers’ use of digital resources (research in progress). OCLC Syst. Serv. Int. Digital Library Perspectives 20(2), 65–70 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., Manouselis, N.: Open educational resources repositories literature review-towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 1098–1106 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Committee, I.L.T.S., et al.: Learning object metadata (2002). http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/

  7. Cooper, J., Olsher, S., Yerushalmy, M.: Didactic metadata informing teachers’ selection of learning resources: boundary crossing in professional development. J. Math. Teacher Educ. 23(4), 363–384 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diekema, A.R., Olsen, M.W.: Personal information management practices of teachers. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 48(1), 1–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diekema, A.R., Olsen, M.W.: The notion of relevance in teacher information behavior. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Doush, I.A., Alkhateeb, F., Maghayreh, E.A., Alsmadi, I., Samarah, S.: Annotations, collaborative tagging, and searching mathematics in e-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.1780 (2012)

  11. Downes, S.: Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary J. E-Learning Learn. Objects 3(1), 29–44 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutton, K.: Increasing diversity, awareness, and inclusion in corporate culture: investigating communities of practice and resource groups among employees. Dev. Learn. Organizations Int. J. 32, 19–21 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gueudet, G., Trouche, L.: Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educ. Stud. Math. 71, 199–218 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Intelligent tutors as teachers’ aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp. 257–266 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-ai complementarity. Grantee Submission (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koper, R.: Use of the semantic web to solve some basic problems in education: Increase flexible, distributed lifelong learning; decrease teacher’s workload. J. Interact. Media Educ. 2004(1), 1–23 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Q., Baker, R., Warschauer, M.: Using clickstream data to measure, understand, and support self-regulated learning in online courses. Internet High. Educ. 45, 100727 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nazaretsky, T., Bar, C., Walter, M., Alexandron, G.: Empowering teachers with ai: co-designing a learning analytics tool for personalized instruction in the science classroom. In: LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 1–12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quentin, I., Bruillard, É.: Explaining internal functioning of online teacher networks: between personal interest and depersonalized collective production, between the sandbox and the hive. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 2627–2634. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Recker, M., Dorward, J., Dawson, D., Mao, X., Liu, Y., Palmer, B., Halioris, S., Park, J.: Teaching, designing, and sharing: a context for learning objects. Interdisc. J. E-Learning Learn. Objects 1(1), 197–216 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Recker, M.M., Dorward, J., Nelson, L.M.: Discovery and use of online learning resources: case study findings. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 7(2), 93–104 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Recker, M.M., Walker, A., Lawless, K.: What do you recommend? implementation and analyses of collaborative information filtering of web resources for education. Instr. Sci. 31(4), 299–316 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Regalla, M., Davies, A., Grissom, D., Losavio, A.: Classroom to communities of practice: benefits for English learners and teacher candidates through partnerships. Multicult. Perspect. 20(1), 25–32 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shelton, B.E., Duffin, J., Wang, Y., Ball, J.: Linking open course wares and open education resources: creating an effective search and recommendation system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 1(2), 2865–2870 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Siedel, H., Stylianides, A.J.: Teachers’ selection of resources in an era of plenty: An interview study with secondary mathematics teachers in England. Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues, pp. 119–144 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Speer, N.M.: Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educ. Stud. Math. 58, 361–391 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., Studer, R.: elearning based on the semantic web. In: WebNet2001-World Conference on the WWW and Internet, pp. 23–27. Citeseer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weibel, S.L., Koch, T.: The dublin core metadata initiative. D-lib magazine 6(12), 1082–9873 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wenger, E., et al.: Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Syst. Thinker 9(5), 2–3 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elad Yacobson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yacobson, E., Alexandron, G. (2023). How Do Teachers Search for Learning Resources? A Mixed Method Field Study. In: Viberg, O., Jivet, I., Muñoz-Merino, P., Perifanou, M., Papathoma, T. (eds) Responsive and Sustainable Educational Futures. EC-TEL 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42681-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42682-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics