Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Participatory Design and UX Research Methods, Using Interdisciplinary Knowledge From Design, Pedagogy and Nutrition to Promote Food Literacy in Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Design III

Abstract

Design, as an area of knowledge enabled one to work with creative methods that act in complex situations and can facilitate the combination of interdisciplinary knowledge. To address the need to promote food literacy in children, design research can consider the current ludic context that aims to encourage learning through educational games. The methodology is qualitative and descriptive, based on an exploratory approach. This chapter explores the immersion that elapsed in the field, through participatory design and with the application of design cards about different stages related to foods. Then other UX (user experience) research methods were applied, based on the results of the participatory design experiment, to reflect on the thoughts and feelings of children, generating more specific insights. This allowed the creation of personas and scenarios, as well as user journey mapping, getting a greater awareness of the requirements that should be included in the product design sketch stage, increasing the possibility of the game being successful. As future research work, it is intended to produce and test a prototype of the projected analogue game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kangas M (2010) Creative and playful learning: learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Think Skills Creativity 5(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandell M, Mikkelsen BE, Lyytikäinen A, Ojansivu P, Hoppu U, Hillgrén A, Lagströme H (2016) Future for food education of children. Futures 83:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhamra T, Lilley D, Tang T (2015) Design for sustainable behaviour: using products to change consumer behaviour. Des J 14(4):427–445. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611X13091688930453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oxman R (2004) Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education. Des Stud 25(1):63–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00033-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krause C, Sommerhalder K, Beer-Borst S, Abel T (2018) Just a subtle difference? Findings from a systematic review on definitions of nutrition literacy and food literacy. Health Promot Int 33(3):378–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schifferstein HNJ (2023) Supporting food design with consumer research: from inspiration and validation to participation and integration. Curr Opin Food Sci 5:101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Florack A, Haasova S, Hirschauer S, Serfas BG (2018) Playing with food: the effects of food pre-exposure on consumption in young children. Physiol Behav 195:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan R, Deci E (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SDT.pdf

  9. Kapp KM, Blair L, Mesch R (2014) The gamification of learning and instruction field-book: ideas into practice. Wiley, EUA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piaget J (1962) Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalmpourtzis G (2018) Educational game design fundamentals. A journey to creating intrinsically motivating learning experiences. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. DeSmet A, Van Ryckeghem D, Compernolle S, Baranowski T, Thompson D, Crombez G, Poels K, Van Lippevelde W, Bastiaensens S, Van Cleemput K, Vandebosch H, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2014) A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Prev Med 69:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Majumdar D, Koch PA, Lee H, Contento IR, Islas A, Fu D (2013) “Creature-101”: a serious game to promote energy balance-related behaviors among middle school adolescents. Games Health J 2(5):280–290. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2013.0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Desmurget M (2021) A Fábrica de Cretinos Digitais. Os perigos dos ecrãs para os nossos filhos (translated by Inês Fraga, Portuguese edition). Contraponto, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hattie JAC, Yates GR (2013) Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Amaro S, Viggiano A, Di Costanzo A, Madeo I, Viggiano A, Baccari ME, Marchitelli E, Raia M, Viggiano E, Deepak S, Monda M, De Luca B (2006) Kalèdo, a new educational board-game, gives nutritional rudiments and encourages healthy eating in children: A pilot cluster randomized trial. Eur J Pediatr 165(9):630–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0153-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Porter L, Bailey-Jones C, Priudokaite G, Allen S, Wood K, Stiles K, Parvin O, Javaid M, Verbruggen F, Lawrence NS (2018) From cookies to carrots; the effect of inhibitory control training on children’s snack selections. Appetite 124:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bannon LJ, Ehn P (2013) Design: design matters in participatory design. In: Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, New York, pp 37–63

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ehn P (1993) Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: Principles and practices. Erlbaum, New York, pp 41–77

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nisha B (2022) Lost in imagined space: a psychoanalysis of participatory design. Des Stud 81:101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future: a systems approach to societal problems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kensing F, Greenbaum J (2013) Heritage: having a say. In: Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, New York, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lucero A, Arrasvuori J (2013) The PLEX cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness. Int J Arts Technol 6(1):22–43. http://www.funkydesignspaces.com/publications/2013/lucero13_PLEX_cards.pdf

  24. Lucero A, Karapanos E, Arrasvuori J, Korhonen H (2014) Playful or gameful? creating delightful user experiences. Interactions 21(3):34–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2590973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lucero A, Dalsgaard P, Halskov K, Buur J (2016) Designing with cards. In: Markopoulos P, Martens JB, Malins J, Coninx K, Liapis A (eds) Collaboration in creative design: methods and tools, Springer, Switzerland, pp 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_5

  26. Martin B, Hanington B (2012) Universal methods of design. 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers, EUA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goodman E, Kuniavsky M, Moed A (2012) Field visits: learning from observation. In: Goodman E, Kuniavsky M, Moed A (eds) Observing the user experience: a practitioner’s guide to user research, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, MA, pp 211–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Adlin T, Pruitt J (2010) The essential persona lifecycle: your guide to building and using personas. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nielsen L (2019) Persona writing. In: Nielsen L (ed) Personas-user focused design. Human–computer interaction series. 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, London, pp 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7427-1_4

  30. Cairns P, Pinker I, Ward A, Watson E, Laidlaw A (2021) Empathy maps in communication skills training. Clin Teach 18(2):142–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonagh-Philp D, Lebbon C (2000) The emotional domain in product design. Des J 3(1):31–43. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069200789393562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kalbach J (2021) Illustrate: make it visual. In: kalbach J (ed) Mapping experiences. A complete guide to customer alignment through journeys, blueprints & diagrams. 2nd edn, O’reilly, Sebastopol, CA, pp 173–204

    Google Scholar 

  33. Félix M, Duarte V (2018) Design and development of a sustainable lunch box, which aims to contribute to a better quality of life. Int J Qual Res 12(4):869–884. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR12.04-06

  34. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2012) Product design and development, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baskinger M, Bardel W (2013) Drawing ideas. A hand-drawn approach for better design. Watson-Guptill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eissen K, Steur R (2014) Sketching, product design presentation. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financed by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the Strategic Project with the reference SFRH/BD/05009/2021. The authors would like to acknowledge the support given by FCT and by CIAUD—Research Center for Architecture, Urbanism and Design, Lisbon School of Architecture, Universidade de Lisboa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verónica Duarte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duarte, V., Félix, M.J., de Aboim Borges, M., Viegas, C. (2024). Participatory Design and UX Research Methods, Using Interdisciplinary Knowledge From Design, Pedagogy and Nutrition to Promote Food Literacy in Children. In: Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, R. (eds) Perspectives on Design III. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43516-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43516-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43515-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43516-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics