Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Window-Controlled Sepsis Prediction Using a Model Selection Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2023)

Abstract

Sepsis is a major risk to patient in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and is associated with substantial treatment expenditure. As most cases of sepsis are acquired during the ICU stay, timely identification and intervention play a crucial role in enhancing the survival rate of septic patients and reducing the financial burden of treatment. Prior research has established that machine learning approaches surpass conventional scoring systems in predicting sepsis. However, these existing machine learning methodologies exhibit limitations when predicting sepsis with flexible window settings. Their performance is heavily reliant on the selection of prediction and feature windows, which restricts their practical applicability in clinical settings. This paper aims to overcome this challenge by introducing a model selection approach for sepsis prediction, utilizing a window-controlled strategy. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms existing models and exhibits enhanced stability across various prediction and feature windows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angus, D.C., Linde-Zwirble, W.T., Lidicker, J., Clermont, G., Carcillo, J., Pinsky, M.R.: Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the united states: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit. Care Med. 29(7), 1303–1310 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, S., Alsadoon, A., Prasad, P., Al Aloussi, S., Alsadoon, O.H.: A novel solution of using deep learning for early prediction cardiac arrest in sepsis patient: enhanced bidirectional long short-term memory (lstm). Multimedia Tools Appl. 80, 32639–32664 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bone, R.C., et al.: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest 101(6), 1644–1655 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brink, A., et al.: Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the emergency department; a retrospective cohort study comparing qsofa, sirs and national early warning score. PLoS ONE 14(1), e0211133 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvert, J.S., et al.: A computational approach to early sepsis detection. Comput. Biol. Med. 74, 69–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Çıldır, E., Bulut, M., Akalın, H., Kocabaş, E., Ocakoğlu, G., Aydın, ŞA.: Evaluation of the modified meds, mews score and charlson comorbidity index in patients with community acquired sepsis in the emergency department. Intern. Emerg. Med. 8, 255–260 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dykes, L.A., Heintz, S.J., Heintz, B.H., Livorsi, D.J., Egge, J.A., Lund, B.C.: Contrasting qSOFA and sirs criteria for early sepsis identification in a veteran population. Fed. Pract. 36(Suppl 2), S21 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elsken, T., Metzen, J.H., Hutter, F.: Neural architecture search: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20(1), 1997–2017 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Esteban, C., Staeck, O., Baier, S., Yang, Y., Tresp, V.: Predicting clinical events by combining static and dynamic information using recurrent neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), pp. 93–101. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, T.: Diagnosis and management of sepsis. Clin. Med. 18(2), 146 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleuren, L.M., et al.: Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Intensive Care Med. 46, 383–400 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Islam, M.M., Nasrin, T., Walther, B.A., Wu, C.C., Yang, H.C., Li, Y.C.: Prediction of sepsis patients using machine learning approach: a meta-analysis. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 170, 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaji, D.A., Zech, J.R., Kim, J.S., Cho, S.K., Dangayach, N.S., Costa, A.B., Oermann, E.K.: An attention based deep learning model of clinical events in the intensive care unit. PLoS ONE 14(2), e0211057 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khoshnevisan, F., Ivy, J., Capan, M., Arnold, R., Huddleston, J., Chi, M.: Recent temporal pattern mining for septic shock early prediction. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), pp. 229–240. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy, M.M., et al.: 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/sis international sepsis definitions conference. Intensive Care Med. 29, 530–538 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, C., et al.: Early diagnosis and prediction of sepsis shock by combining static and dynamic information using convolutional-LSTM. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), pp. 219–228. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lipton, Z.C., Kale, D.C., Elkan, C., Wetzel, R.: Learning to diagnose with LSTM recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.03677 (2015)

  19. Liu, V.X., et al.: The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 196(7), 856–863 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marik, P.E., Taeb, A.M.: Sirs, qSOFA and new sepsis definition. J. Thorac. Dis. 9(4), 943 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, G.S., Mannino, D.M., Eaton, S., Moss, M.: The epidemiology of sepsis in the united states from 1979 through 2000. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(16), 1546–1554 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moor, M., Rieck, B., Horn, M., Jutzeler, C.R., Borgwardt, K.: Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU using machine learning: a systematic review. Front. Med. 8, 607952 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raffel, C., et al.: Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21(1), 5485–5551 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren, P., et al.: A comprehensive survey of neural architecture search: challenges and solutions. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 54(4), 1–34 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhodes, A., et al.: Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 43, 304–377 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakr, Y., et al.: Sepsis in intensive care unit patients: worldwide data from the intensive care over nations audit. In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, p. ofy313. Oxford University Press US (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scherpf, M., Gräßer, F., Malberg, H., Zaunseder, S.: Predicting sepsis with a recurrent neural network using the mimic iii database. Comput. Biol. Med. 113, 103395 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singer, M., et al.: The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8), 801–810 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van der Woude, S., Van Doormaal, F., Hutten, B., Nellen, F., Holleman, F.: Classifying sepsis patients in the emergency department using sirs, qSOFA or mews. Neth. J. Med. 76(4), 158–166 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjie Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Su, S., Lan, S., Zhang, Z., Zhu, A. (2023). Window-Controlled Sepsis Prediction Using a Model Selection Approach. In: Yang, X., et al. Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14180. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46677-9_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46677-9_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46676-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46677-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics