Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Do Learners Appreciate Adaptivity? An Epistemic Network Analysis of How Learners Perceive Adaptive Scaffolding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2023)

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a critical skill for learners to acquire, and academics have designed and implemented SRL scaffolding to support learners in developing their SRL and use of learning strategies. Adaptive scaffolding is believed to be more effective in promoting SRL, but limited studies have explored how different learners perceive the adaptivity of scaffolding to their personal needs in relation to the strategies they use. This study recruited 22 undergraduate learners who were given an online learning task and provided with adaptive scaffolding. Post-task interviews were conducted to understand their learning strategies and how they perceived the adaptivity of the scaffolds. We used epistemic network analysis (ENA) to understand the associations among learning strategies and perceived adaptivity, and to examine whether these associations differed according to task performance. Results indicate that learners’ adoption of learning strategies is associated with their perceived adaptivity of scaffolding, and the association differed between high- and low-performing learners. Learners who adopted a strategy consistent with the scaffolding design expressed a stronger appreciation of its adaptivity and demonstrated higher task performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E.A., Glenn, R.A., Koedinger, K.R.: Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Handb. Res. Learn. Instruct. 2, 522–560 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., Moos, D.C., Greene, J.A., Winters, F.I.: Adaptive content and process scaffolding: a key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychol. Test Assess. Model. 53(1), 106 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bannert, M., Reimann, P.: Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instr. Sci. 40, 193–211 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., Pieger, E.: Short-and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 293–306 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Broadbent, J.: Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet High. Educ. 33, 24–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffy, M.C., Azevedo, R.: Motivation matters: interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 338–348 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Greene, J.A., Azevedo, R.: A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: new perspectives and directions. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(3), 334–372 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hadwin, A.F., Winne, P.H., Stockley, D.B., Nesbit, J.C., Woszczyna, C.: Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. J. Educ. Psychol. 93(3), 477 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, R.S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., Kester, L.: Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Comput. Educ. 146, 103771 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Specht, M., Drachsler, H.: License to evaluate: preparing learning analytics dashboards for educational practice. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 31–40 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Pardo, A., Dawson, S., Whitelock-Wainwright, A.: Introducing meaning to clicks: towards traced-measures of self-efficacy and cognitive load. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 511–520 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lim, L.A., et al.: Students’ sense-making of personalised feedback based on learning analytics. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 36(6), 15–33 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim, L.A., et al.: Students’ perceptions of, and emotional responses to, personalised learning analytics-based feedback: an exploratory study of four courses. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 46(3), 339–359 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim, L., et al.: Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 139, 107547 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milikić, N., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J.: Measuring effects of technology-enabled mirroring scaffolds on self-regulated learning. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 13(1), 150–163 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N.: Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 50(1), 128–138 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pea, R.D.: The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J. Learn. Sci. 423–451 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pieger, E., Bannert, M.: Differential effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts. Comput. Hum. Behav. 86, 165–173 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rakovic, M., et al.: Using learner trace data to understand metacognitive processes in writing from multiple sources. In: LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 130–141 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: How we code. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 62–77. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Siadaty, M., Gašević, D., Hatala, M.: Associations between technological scaffolding and micro-level processes of self-regulated learning: a workplace study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 1007–1019 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sitzmann, T., Bell, B.S., Kraiger, K., Kanar, A.M.: A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self-regulation in technology-delivered instruction. Pers. Psychol. 62(4), 697–734 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sonnenberg, C., Bannert, M.: Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. J. Learn. Anal. 2(1), 72–100 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weinstein, C.E., Mayer, R.E.: The teaching of learning strategies. In: Innovation abstracts, vol. 5, p. n32. ERIC (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winne, P.H.: Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 89(3), 397 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Winne, P.H.: How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educ. Psychol. 41(1), 5–17 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Winne, P.H.: Learning strategies, study skills, and self-regulated learning in postsecondary education. High. Educ.: Handb. Theory Res. 28, 377–403 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, M., Winne, P.H.: Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation. Learn. Instr. 22(6), 413–419 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tongguang Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, T. et al. (2023). Do Learners Appreciate Adaptivity? An Epistemic Network Analysis of How Learners Perceive Adaptive Scaffolding. In: Arastoopour Irgens, G., Knight, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47013-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47014-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics