Abstract
Ultrasonic guided waves enable us to monitor large regions of a structure at one time. Characterizing damage through reflection-based and tomography-based analysis or by extracting information from wavefields measured across the structure is a complex dynamic-data driven applications system (DDDAS). As part of the measurement system, guided waves are often measured with in situ piezoelectric sensors or wavefield imaging systems, such as a scanning laser doppler vibrometer. Adding sensors onto a structure is costly in terms of components, wiring, and processing and adds to the complexity of the DDDAS while sampling points with a laser doppler vibrometer requires substantial time since each spatial location is often averaged to minimize perturbations introduced by dynamic data. To reduce this burden, several approaches have been proposed to reconstruct full wavefields from a small amount of data. Many of these techniques are based on compressive sensing theory, which assumes the data is sparse in some domain. Among the existing methods, sparse wavenumber analysis achieves excellent reconstruction accuracy with a small amount of data (often 50 to 100 measurements) but assumes a simple geometry (e.g., a large plate) and assumes knowledge of the transmitter location. This is insufficient in many practical scenarios since most structures have many sources of reflection. Many other compressive sensing methods reconstruct wavefields from Fourier bases. These methods are geometry agnostic but require much more data (often more than 1000 measurements). This paper demonstrates a new DDDAS approach based on unsupervised wave physics-informed representation learning. Our method enables learning full wavefield representations of guided wave datasets. Unlike most compressive sensing methodologies that utilize sparsity in some domain, the approach we developed in our lab is based on injecting wave physics into a low rank minimization algorithm. Unlike many other learning algorithms, including deep learning methods, our approach has global convergence guarantees and the low rank minimizer enables us to predict wavefield behavior in unmeasured regions of the structure. The algorithm can also enforce the wave equation across space, time, or both dimensions simultaneously. Injecting physics also provides the algorithm tolerance to data perturbations. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithm with experimental wavefield data from a 1m by 1m region of an aluminum plate with a half-thickness notch in its center.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cawley, P.: Practical guided wave inspection and applications to structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, p. 10 (2007)
Moll, J., et al.: Open Guided Waves: online platform for ultrasonic guided wave measurements. Struct. Health Monit. 18(5–6), 1903–1914 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718817169
Staszewski, W.J., Lee, B.C., Mallet, L., Scarpa, F.: Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: I. Lamb wave sensing. Smart Mater. Struct. 13(2), 251 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/002
Dawson, A.J., Michaels, J.E., Michaels, T.E.: Isolation of ultrasonic scattering by wavefield baseline subtraction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 70–71, 891–903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2015.09.008
Tetali, H.V., Harley, J.B., Haeffele, B.D.: Wave-informed matrix factorization with global optimality guarantees. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.09144v1 (2021)
Harley, J.B., Moura, J.M.F.: Data-driven matched field processing for Lamb wave structural health monitoring. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 3 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4863651
Harley, J.B.: Statistical lamb wave localization based on extreme value theory. Proc. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 1949, 090004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031567
Perelli, A., De Marchi, L., Marzani, A., Speciale, N.: Frequency warped cross-wavelet multiresolution analysis of guided waves for impact localization. Signal Process. 96(PART A), 51–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SIGPRO.2013.05.008
Rao, J., Ratassepp, M., Fan, Z.: Guided wave tomography based on full waveform inversion. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 63, 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2536144
Sheremet, A., Qin, Y., Kennedy, J.P., Zhou, Y., Maurer, A.P.: Wave turbulence and energy cascade in the hippocampus. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00062
Harley, J.B., Schmidt, A.C., Moura, J.M.F.: Accurate sparse recovery of guided wave characteristics for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 158–161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0039
Sabeti, S., Harley, J.B.: Spatio-temporal undersampling: recovering ultrasonic guided wavefields from incomplete data with compressive sensing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 140, 106694 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106694
Alguri, K.S.S., Melville, J., Harley, J.B.: Baseline-free guided wave damage detection with surrogate data and dictionary learning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143(6), 3807–3818 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5042240
Lai, Z., Alzugaray, I., Chli, M., Chatzi, E.: Full-field structural monitoring using event cameras and physics-informed sparse identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 145, 106905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2020.106905
Mesnil, O., Ruzzene, M.: Sparse wavefield reconstruction and source detection using compressed sensing. Ultrasonics 67, 94–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAS.2015.12.014
di Ianni, T., de Marchi, L., Perelli, A., Marzani, A.: Compressive sensing of full wave field data for structural health monitoring applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 62(7), 1373–1383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2014.006925
Sawant, S., Banerjee, S., Tallur, S.: Performance evaluation of compressive sensing based lost data recovery using OMP for damage index estimation in ultrasonic SHM. Ultrasonics 115, 106439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAS.2021.106439
Ravela, S.: Two extensions of data assimilation by field alignment. In: Shi, Y., et al. (eds.) Computational Science – ICCS 2007, pp. 1147–1154. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72584-8_150
Huang, R., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Wei, Z., Mei, J., Wang, P.: Full-waveform inversion for full-wavefield imaging: decades in the making. Lead. Edge 40(5), 324–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1190/TLE40050324.1
Tetali, H.V., Alguri, K.S., Harley, J.B.: Wave physics informed dictionary learning in one dimension. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), vol. 2019, pp. 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2019.8918835
Tetali, H.V., Harley, J.B., Haeffele, B.D.: Wave physics-informed matrix factorizations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 72, 535–548 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2023.3348948
Yang, D., Tong, P., Deng, X.: A central difference method with low numerical dispersion for solving the scalar wave equation. Geophys. Prospect. 60(5), 885–905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2478.2011.01033.X
Recht, B., Fazel, M., Parrilo, P.A.: Guaranteed minimum-rank solutions of linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization. SIAM Rev. 52(3), 471–501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1137/070697835
Marple, S.L.: Tutorial overview of modern spectral estimation. ICASSP, IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. Proc. 4, 2152–2157 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1989.266889
Gao, F., Hua, J., Wang, L., Zeng, L., Lin, J.: Local wavenumber method for delamination characterization in composites with sparse representation of Lamb waves. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 68(4), 1305–1313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3022880
Tian, Z., Xiao, W., Ma, Z., Yu, L.: Dispersion curve regression – assisted wideband local wavenumber analysis for characterizing three-dimensional (3D) profile of hidden corrosion damage. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 150, 107347 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2020.107347
Moll, J., Wandowski, T., Malinowski, P., Radzienski, M., Opoka, S., Ostachowicz, W.: Experimental analysis and prediction of antisymmetric wave motion in a tapered anisotropic waveguide. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138(1), 299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4922823
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by NSF EECS-1839704 and NSF CISE-1747783.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harley, J.B., Haeffele, B., Tetali, H.V. (2024). Unsupervised Wave Physics-Informed Representation Learning for Guided Wavefield Reconstruction. In: Blasch, E., Darema, F., Aved, A. (eds) Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems. DDDAS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13984. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52669-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52670-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)