Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Unsupervised Wave Physics-Informed Representation Learning for Guided Wavefield Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems (DDDAS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13984))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

Ultrasonic guided waves enable us to monitor large regions of a structure at one time. Characterizing damage through reflection-based and tomography-based analysis or by extracting information from wavefields measured across the structure is a complex dynamic-data driven applications system (DDDAS). As part of the measurement system, guided waves are often measured with in situ piezoelectric sensors or wavefield imaging systems, such as a scanning laser doppler vibrometer. Adding sensors onto a structure is costly in terms of components, wiring, and processing and adds to the complexity of the DDDAS while sampling points with a laser doppler vibrometer requires substantial time since each spatial location is often averaged to minimize perturbations introduced by dynamic data. To reduce this burden, several approaches have been proposed to reconstruct full wavefields from a small amount of data. Many of these techniques are based on compressive sensing theory, which assumes the data is sparse in some domain. Among the existing methods, sparse wavenumber analysis achieves excellent reconstruction accuracy with a small amount of data (often 50 to 100 measurements) but assumes a simple geometry (e.g., a large plate) and assumes knowledge of the transmitter location. This is insufficient in many practical scenarios since most structures have many sources of reflection. Many other compressive sensing methods reconstruct wavefields from Fourier bases. These methods are geometry agnostic but require much more data (often more than 1000 measurements). This paper demonstrates a new DDDAS approach based on unsupervised wave physics-informed representation learning. Our method enables learning full wavefield representations of guided wave datasets. Unlike most compressive sensing methodologies that utilize sparsity in some domain, the approach we developed in our lab is based on injecting wave physics into a low rank minimization algorithm. Unlike many other learning algorithms, including deep learning methods, our approach has global convergence guarantees and the low rank minimizer enables us to predict wavefield behavior in unmeasured regions of the structure. The algorithm can also enforce the wave equation across space, time, or both dimensions simultaneously. Injecting physics also provides the algorithm tolerance to data perturbations. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithm with experimental wavefield data from a 1m by 1m region of an aluminum plate with a half-thickness notch in its center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cawley, P.: Practical guided wave inspection and applications to structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, p. 10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moll, J., et al.: Open Guided Waves: online platform for ultrasonic guided wave measurements. Struct. Health Monit. 18(5–6), 1903–1914 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718817169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Staszewski, W.J., Lee, B.C., Mallet, L., Scarpa, F.: Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: I. Lamb wave sensing. Smart Mater. Struct. 13(2), 251 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/002

  4. Dawson, A.J., Michaels, J.E., Michaels, T.E.: Isolation of ultrasonic scattering by wavefield baseline subtraction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 70–71, 891–903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2015.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tetali, H.V., Harley, J.B., Haeffele, B.D.: Wave-informed matrix factorization with global optimality guarantees. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.09144v1 (2021)

  6. Harley, J.B., Moura, J.M.F.: Data-driven matched field processing for Lamb wave structural health monitoring. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 3 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4863651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harley, J.B.: Statistical lamb wave localization based on extreme value theory. Proc. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 1949, 090004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031567

  8. Perelli, A., De Marchi, L., Marzani, A., Speciale, N.: Frequency warped cross-wavelet multiresolution analysis of guided waves for impact localization. Signal Process. 96(PART A), 51–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SIGPRO.2013.05.008

  9. Rao, J., Ratassepp, M., Fan, Z.: Guided wave tomography based on full waveform inversion. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 63, 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2536144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheremet, A., Qin, Y., Kennedy, J.P., Zhou, Y., Maurer, A.P.: Wave turbulence and energy cascade in the hippocampus. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00062

  11. Harley, J.B., Schmidt, A.C., Moura, J.M.F.: Accurate sparse recovery of guided wave characteristics for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 158–161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0039

  12. Sabeti, S., Harley, J.B.: Spatio-temporal undersampling: recovering ultrasonic guided wavefields from incomplete data with compressive sensing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 140, 106694 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106694

  13. Alguri, K.S.S., Melville, J., Harley, J.B.: Baseline-free guided wave damage detection with surrogate data and dictionary learning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143(6), 3807–3818 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5042240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai, Z., Alzugaray, I., Chli, M., Chatzi, E.: Full-field structural monitoring using event cameras and physics-informed sparse identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 145, 106905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2020.106905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mesnil, O., Ruzzene, M.: Sparse wavefield reconstruction and source detection using compressed sensing. Ultrasonics 67, 94–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAS.2015.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. di Ianni, T., de Marchi, L., Perelli, A., Marzani, A.: Compressive sensing of full wave field data for structural health monitoring applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 62(7), 1373–1383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2014.006925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sawant, S., Banerjee, S., Tallur, S.: Performance evaluation of compressive sensing based lost data recovery using OMP for damage index estimation in ultrasonic SHM. Ultrasonics 115, 106439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAS.2021.106439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ravela, S.: Two extensions of data assimilation by field alignment. In: Shi, Y., et al. (eds.) Computational Science – ICCS 2007, pp. 1147–1154. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72584-8_150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, R., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Wei, Z., Mei, J., Wang, P.: Full-waveform inversion for full-wavefield imaging: decades in the making. Lead. Edge 40(5), 324–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1190/TLE40050324.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tetali, H.V., Alguri, K.S., Harley, J.B.: Wave physics informed dictionary learning in one dimension. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), vol. 2019, pp. 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2019.8918835

  21. Tetali, H.V., Harley, J.B., Haeffele, B.D.: Wave physics-informed matrix factorizations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 72, 535–548 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2023.3348948

  22. Yang, D., Tong, P., Deng, X.: A central difference method with low numerical dispersion for solving the scalar wave equation. Geophys. Prospect. 60(5), 885–905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2478.2011.01033.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Recht, B., Fazel, M., Parrilo, P.A.: Guaranteed minimum-rank solutions of linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization. SIAM Rev. 52(3), 471–501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1137/070697835

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Marple, S.L.: Tutorial overview of modern spectral estimation. ICASSP, IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. Proc. 4, 2152–2157 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1989.266889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao, F., Hua, J., Wang, L., Zeng, L., Lin, J.: Local wavenumber method for delamination characterization in composites with sparse representation of Lamb waves. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 68(4), 1305–1313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3022880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tian, Z., Xiao, W., Ma, Z., Yu, L.: Dispersion curve regression – assisted wideband local wavenumber analysis for characterizing three-dimensional (3D) profile of hidden corrosion damage. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 150, 107347 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2020.107347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moll, J., Wandowski, T., Malinowski, P., Radzienski, M., Opoka, S., Ostachowicz, W.: Experimental analysis and prediction of antisymmetric wave motion in a tapered anisotropic waveguide. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138(1), 299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4922823

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by NSF EECS-1839704 and NSF CISE-1747783.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel B. Harley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Harley, J.B., Haeffele, B., Tetali, H.V. (2024). Unsupervised Wave Physics-Informed Representation Learning for Guided Wavefield Reconstruction. In: Blasch, E., Darema, F., Aved, A. (eds) Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems. DDDAS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13984. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52669-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52670-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics