Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Coupled Sensor Configuration and Path-Planning in a Multimodal Threat Field

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems (DDDAS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13984))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

A coupled path-planning and sensor configuration method is proposed. The path-planning objective is to minimize exposure to an unknown, spatially-varying, and temporally static scalar field called the threat field. The threat field is modeled as a weighted sum of several scalar fields, each representing a mode of threat. A heterogeneous sensor network takes noisy measurements of the threat field. Each sensor in the network observes one or more threat modes within a circular field of view (FoV). The sensors are configurable, i.e., parameters such as location and size of field of view can be changed. The measurement noise is assumed to be normally distributed with zero mean and a variance that monotonically increases with the size of the FoV, emulating the FoV v/s resolution trade-off in most sensors. Gaussian Process regression is used to estimate the threat field from these measurements. The main innovation of this work is that sensor configuration is performed by maximizing a so-called task-driven information gain (TDIG) metric, which quantifies uncertainty reduction in the cost of the planned path. Because the TDIG does not have any convenient structural properties, a surrogate function called the self-adaptive mutual information (SAMI) is considered. Sensor configuration based on the TDIG or SAMI introduces coupling with path-planning in accordance with the dynamic data-driven application systems paradigm. The benefit of this approach is that near-optimal plans are found with a relatively small number of measurements. In comparison to decoupled path-planning and sensor configuration based on traditional information-driven metrics, the proposed CSCP method results in near-optimal plans with fewer measurements.

Supported by NSF grant #1646367 and #2126818.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. LaValle, S.M.: Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, S., Kumar, N.: Path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: a review, solutions, and challenges. Comput. Commun. 149, 270–299 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1(1), 269–271 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart, P., Nilsson, N., Raphael, B.: A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. 4(2), 100–107 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1109/tssc.1968.300136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohanan, M., Salgoankar, A.: A survey of robotic motion planning in dynamic environments. Robot. Auton. Syst. 100, 171–185 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Esfahani, P.M., Chatterjee, D., Lygeros, J.: Motion planning for continuous-time stochastic processes: a dynamic programming approach. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 61(8), 2155–2170 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurniawati, H., Bandyopadhyay, T., Patrikalakis, N.M.: Global motion planning under uncertain motion, sensing, and environment map. Auton. Robot. 33(3), 255–272 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramsden, D.: Optimization Approaches To Sensor Placement Problems. Ph.D. dissertation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cochran, D., Hero, A.O.: Information-driven sensor planning: navigating a statistical manifold. In: 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, GlobalSIP 2013 - Proceedings, pp. 1049–1052 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Demetriou, M., Gatsonis, N., Court, J.: Coupled controls-computational fluids approach for the estimation of the concentration from a moving gaseous source in a 2-d domain with a Lyapunov-guided sensing aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 22(3), 853–867 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Merino, L., Caballero, F., Martínez-de Dios, J.R., Ferruz, J., Ollero, A.: A cooperative perception system for multiple UAVs: application to automatic detection of forest fires. J. Field Rob. 23(34), 165–184 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madankan, R.: Computation of probabilistic hazard maps and source parameter estimation for volcanic ash transport and dispersion. J. Comput. Phys. 271, 39–59 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranieri, J., Chebira, A., Vetterli, M.: Near-optimal sensor placement for linear inverse problems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 62(5), 1135–1146 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, S., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Zhang, Z.: Optimal sensor placement using FRFs-based clustering method. J. Sound Vib. 385, 69–80 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoganathan, D., Kondepudi, S., Kalluri, B., Manthapuri, S.: Optimal sensor placement strategy for office buildings using clustering algorithms. Energy Build. 158, 1206–1225 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreucher, C., Hero, A.O., Kastella, K.: A comparison of task driven and information driven sensor management for target tracking. In: Proceedings of 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4004–4009 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tzoumas, V., Carlone, L., Pappas, G.J., Jadbabaie, A.: LQG control and sensing co-design. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 66(4), 1468–1483 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen, T., Hill, A., Underwood, J., Scheding, S.: Dynamic path planning with multi-agent data fusion - the parallel hierarchical replanner. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3245–3250 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Skoglar, P., Nygards, J., Ulvklo, M.: Concurrent path and sensor planning for a UAV - towards an information based approach incorporating models of environment and sensor. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2436–2442 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. St. Laurent, C.L., Cowlagi, R.V.: Breadth-first coupled sensor configuration and path-planning in unknown static environments. In: Proceedings of the 60th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laurent, C.S., Cowlagi, R.V.: Depth-first coupled sensor configuration and path-planning in unknown static environments. In: Proceedings of the 2021 European Control Conference (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laurent, C.S., Cowlagi, R.V.: Coupled sensor configuration and path-planning in unknown static environments. In: Proceedings of the 2021 American Control Conference (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. St. Laurent, C.L.: Coupled sensor configuration and path-planning in uncertain environments using multimodal sensors. Ph.D. dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA (2022). https://digital.wpi.edu/show/n296x2271

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raghvendra V. Cowlagi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laurent, C.L.S., Cowlagi, R.V. (2024). Coupled Sensor Configuration and Path-Planning in a Multimodal Threat Field. In: Blasch, E., Darema, F., Aved, A. (eds) Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems. DDDAS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13984. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52669-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52670-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics