Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Comparison of Fiducial Markers Pose Estimation for UAVs Indoor Precision Landing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications (OL2A 2023)

Abstract

Cooperative robotics is exponentially gaining strength in scientific research, especially regarding the cooperation between ground mobile robots and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), where the remaining challenges are equipollent to its potential uses in different fields, such as agriculture and electrical tower inspections. Due to the complexity involved in the process, precision landing by UAVs on moving robotic platforms for tasks such as battery hot-swapping is a major open research question. This work explores the feasibility and accuracy of different fiducial markers to aid in the precision landing process by a UAV on a mobile robotic platform. For this purpose, a Tello UAV was used to acquire images at different positions, angles, and distances from ArUco, ARTag, and ArUco Board markers to evaluate their detection precision. The analyses demonstrate the highest reliability in the measurements performed through the ArUco marker. Future work will be devoted to using the ArUco marker to perform precision landing on a mobile robotic platform, considering the necessary adjustments to lessen the impact of errors intrinsic to detecting the fiducial marker during the landing procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Castro, G.G.R., et al.: Adaptive path planning for fusing rapidly exploring random trees and deep reinforcement learning in an agriculture dynamic environment uavs. Agriculture 13(2), 354 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, R., Arya, R.: Uav based long range environment monitoring system with industry 5.0 perspectives for smart city infrastructure. Comput. Indus. Eng. 168, 108066 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benarbia, T., Kyamakya, K.: A literature review of drone-based package delivery logistics systems and their implementation feasibility. Sustainability 14(1) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, G.S., et al.: Sensor architecture model for unmanned aerial vehicles dedicated to electrical tower inspections. In: Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications: Second International Conference, OL2A 2022, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal, 24–25 October 2022, Proceedings, pp. 35–50. Springer (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23236-7_3

  5. Mohsan, S.A.H., Khan, M.A., Noor, F., Ullah, I., Alsharif, M.H.: Towards the unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs): a comprehensive review. Drones 6(6) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grlj, C.G., Krznar, N., Pranjić, M.: A decade of uav docking stations: a brief overview of mobile and fixed landing platforms. Drones 6(1) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Niu, G., Yang, Q., Gao, Y., Pun, M.-O.: Vision-based autonomous landing for unmanned aerial and ground vehicles cooperative systems. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7(3), 6234–6241 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Q., et al.: Joint power and time allocation in energy harvesting of uav operating system. Comput. Commun. 150, 811–817 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalaitzakis, M., Carroll, S., Ambrosi, A., Whitehead, C., Vitzilaios, N.: Experimental comparison of fiducial markers for pose estimation. In 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 781–789 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalaitzakis, M., Cain, B., Carroll, S., Ambrosi, A., Whitehead, C., Vitzilaios, N.: Fiducial markers for pose estimation: overview, applications and experimental comparison of the artag, apriltag, aruco and stag markers. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 101, 1–26 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bautista, N., Gutierrez, H., Inness, J., Rakoczy, J.: Precision landing of a quadcopter drone by smartphone video guidance sensor in a gps-denied environment. Sensors 23(4) (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coelho, F.O., Carvalho, J.P., Pinto, M.F., Marcato, A.L.: Ekf and computer vision for mobile robot localization. In: 2018 13th APCA International Conference on Automatic Control and Soft Computing (CONTROLO), pp. 148–153. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quigley, M., et al. Ros: an open-source robot operating system. In: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, Kobe, Japan, vol. 3, p. 5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Alvar aalto museum (Accessed 2023)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alvar: Artoolkit for java. http://virtual.vtt.fi/virtual/proj2/multimedia/alvar/index.html. (Accessed 5 June 2023)

  16. Jurado-Rodríguez, D., Muñoz-Salinas, R., Garrido-Jurado, S., Medina-Carnicer, R.: Design, detection, and tracking of customized fiducial markers. IEEE Access 9, 140066–140078 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, Y.-L., Zou, S.-Z.: A design of an indoor delivery uav. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 2457, 012036 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lima, R.R., Rocamora, B.M., Pereira, G.A.S.: Continuous vector fields for precise cable-guided landing of tethered uavs. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCTMCTES (PIDDAC) to CeDRI (UIDB/05757/2020 and UIDP/05757/2020), SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2021), Oleachain “Skills for sustainability and innovation in the value chain of traditional olive groves in the Northern Interior of Portugal” (Norte06-3559-FSE-000188), Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca (CEFETRJ), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The project that gave rise to these results received the support of a fellowship from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434). The fellowship code is LCF/BQ/DI20/11780028.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Bonzatto Junior .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Junior, L.B. et al. (2024). A Comparison of Fiducial Markers Pose Estimation for UAVs Indoor Precision Landing. In: Pereira, A.I., Mendes, A., Fernandes, F.P., Pacheco, M.F., Coelho, J.P., Lima, J. (eds) Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications. OL2A 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1981. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53025-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53025-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53024-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53025-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics