Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Influence of AI’s Uncertainty in the Dawid-Skene Aggregation for Human-AI Crowdsourcing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win (iConference 2024)

Abstract

The power and expressiveness of AIs are rapidly increasing, and now AIs have the ability to complete tasks in crowdsourcing as if they were human crowd workers. Therefore, the development of methods to effectively aggregate the results of tasks performed by AIs and humans is becoming a critical problem. In this study, we revisit the Dawid-Skene model that has been used to aggregate human votes to obtain better results in classification problems. Most of the state-of-the-art AI classifiers predict the class probabilities as their output. Considering the probabilities represent their uncertainty, utilizing them in Dawid-Skene aggregation may provide higher-quality annotations. To this end, we introduce a variation of the Dawid-Skene model to directly use the probabilities without discarding them and conduct experiments with two real-world datasets of different domains. Experimental results show that the Dawid-Skene model with probabilities improves the overall accuracy. Moreover, a detailed analysis shows that the aggregation results were improved for classification tasks with high uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://huggingface.co/models.

  2. 2.

    https://www.kaggle.com/.

  3. 3.

    Available at https://github.com/Evgeneus/screening-classification-datasets/.

References

  1. Amer-Yahia, S., et al.: Making AI machines work for humans in FoW. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 49(2), 30–35 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bi, W., Wang, L., Kwok, J.T., Tu, Z.: Learning to predict from crowdsourced data. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 82–91 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Branson, S., Horn, G.V., Perona, P.: Lean crowdsourcing: combining humans and machines in an online system. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 6109–6118 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Correia, A., et al.: Designing for hybrid intelligence: a taxonomy and survey of crowd-machine interaction. Appl. Sci. 13(4), 2198 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawid, A.P., Skene, A.M.: Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error-rates using the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Appl. Stat.) 28(1), 20–28 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. He, X., et al.: AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16854 (2023)

  7. Kanda, T., Ito, H., Morishima, A.: Efficient evaluation of AI workers for the human+AI crowd task assignment. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), pp. 3995–4001 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi, M., Wakabayashi, K., Morishima, A.: Human+AI crowd task assignment considering result quality requirements. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP), vol. 9, pp. 97–107 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krivosheev, E., Casati, F., Baez, M., Benatallah, B.: Combining crowd and machines for multi-predicate item screening. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW), vol. 2, pp. 1–18 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Le, Y., Yang, X.: Tiny imagenet visual recognition challenge. CS 231N 7(7) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liao, Y.H., Kar, A., Fidler, S.: Towards good practices for efficiently annotating large-scale image classification datasets. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 4348–4357 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakov, P., Ritter, A., Rosenthal, S., Sebastiani, F., Stoyanov, V.: SemEval-2016 task 4: sentiment analysis in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), pp. 1–18 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen, D.Q., Vu, T., Nguyen, A.T.: BERTweet: a pre-trained language model for English Tweets. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP), pp. 9–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oyama, S., Baba, Y., Sakurai, Y., Kashima, H.: Accurate integration of crowdsourced labels using workers’ self-reported confidence scores. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 2554–2560 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pérez, J.M., Giudici, J.C., Luque, F.: pysentimiento: A Python Toolkit for Sentiment Analysis and SocialNLP tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09462 (2021)

  16. Ramírez, J., Baez, M., Casati, F., Benatallah, B.: Understanding the impact of text highlighting in crowdsourcing tasks. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP), vol. 7, pp. 144–152 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitehill, J., Ruvolo, P., Wu, T., Bergsma, J., Movellan, J.: Whose vote should count more: optimal integration of labels from labelers of unknown expertise. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 2035–2043 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yamashita, Y., Ito, H., Wakabayashi, K., Kobayashi, M., Morishima, A.: HAEM: obtaining higher-quality classification task results with AI workers. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci), pp. 118–128 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21H03552, JP22H00508, JP22K17944, JP23H03405, JST CREST Grant Number JPMJCR21D1, and JPMJCR22M2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takumi Tamura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tamura, T., Ito, H., Oyama, S., Morishima, A. (2024). Influence of AI’s Uncertainty in the Dawid-Skene Aggregation for Human-AI Crowdsourcing. In: Sserwanga, I., et al. Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14598. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57867-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57867-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57867-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics