Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Developing a Multi-phase Stakeholder Game Framework for Recyclable Resource Management System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Centric Decision and Negotiation Support for Societal Transitions (GDN 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 509))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

Understanding the game relationships and behaviors of stakeholders is crucial for effectively promoting the management of recyclable resources. Aiming at the problems existing in the stakeholder game models in recyclable resource management, this study proposed a novel multi-phase stakeholder game framework for the recyclable resource management system, which fully takes into account stakeholders at all levels in the life cycle of recyclable resource management. In order to concretely analyze the game framework, cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of the game relationships among and within stakeholder groups were conducted. By providing a more comprehensive understanding and explanation of stakeholder game relationships and behaviors in recyclable resource management, the proposed game framework could better guide the overall and various levels of recyclable resource management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes, J.H.: Recycling: a problem in reverse logistics. J. Macromark. 2(2), 31–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678200200204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Silva, W.D.O., Morais, D.C.: Impacts and insights of circular business models’ outsourcing decisions on textile and fashion waste management: a multi-criteria decision model for sorting circular strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 370, 133551 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, L., MZhang, L.: Evolutionary game analysis of construction waste recycling management in China. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 161, 104863 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo, S., Chen, L.: Why is China struggling with waste classification? A stakeholder theory perspective. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 183, 106312 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin, Z., Ma, J., Liu, Y., He, J., Guo, Z.: New pathway exploring the effectiveness of waste recycling policy: a quasi-experiment on the effects of perceived policy effectiveness. J. Clean. Prod. 363, 132569 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herat, S.: E-waste management in Asia pacific region: review of issues, challenges and solutions. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 20(1), 45–53 (2021). https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hao, X., Liu, G., Zhang, X., Dong, L.: The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 179, 121627 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hipel, K.W., Fang, L., Wang, L.: Fair water resources allocation with application to the south Saskatchewan river basin. Can. Water Resourc. J. 38(1), 47–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2013.773767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, J., Hipel, K.W.: Exploring social dimensions of municipal solid waste management around the globe - a systematic literature review. Waste Manage. 56, 3–12 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding, L., Guo, Z., Xue, Y.: Dump or recycle? Consumer’s environmental awareness and express package disposal based on an evolutionary game model. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 25(7), 6963–6986 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02343-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong, Y., Li, J., Liu, T., Fan, M., Yu, S., Zhu, Y.: Evolutionary game analysis for protecting suppliers’ privacy between government and waste mobile phone recycling companies: insights from prospect theory. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 43(3), 3115–3132 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, S., Sun, Q.: Evolutionary game analysis of WEEE recycling tripartite stakeholders under variable subsidies and processing fees. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30(5), 11584–11599 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, X., Lin, K., Wang, L.: Stochastic evolutionary game analysis of e-waste recycling in environmental regulation from the perspective of dual governance system. J. Clean. Prod. 319, 128685 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shao, Y., Deng, X., Qing, Q., Wang, Y.: Optimal battery recycling strategy for electric vehicle under government subsidy in China. Sustainability 10(12), 4855 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soltani, A., Sadiq, R., Hewage, K.: Selecting sustainable waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste treatment: a game theory approach for group decision-making. J. Clean. Prod. 113, 388–399 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Su, Y., Si, H., Chen, J., Wu, G.: Promoting the sustainable development of the recycling market of construction and demolition waste: a stakeholder game perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 277, 122281 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Chen, B., Wang, Y.: Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of multiple stakeholders in E-waste recycling industry. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 155, 104618 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, J., Long, R., Chen, H., Sun, Q.: A comparative analysis of express packaging waste recycling models based on the differential game theory. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105449 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Askar, S.S., Al-khedhairi, A.: A remanufacturing duopoly game based on a piecewise nonlinear map: analysis and investigations. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 21(6), 549–561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2019-0150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta, V.K., Kaushal, R.K., Shukla, S.P.: Multi-stakeholder policy modeling for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste. Waste Manage. Res. J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 36(7), 577–593 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ji, Y.J., Jiao, R.J., Chen, L., Wu, C.L., Li, H.: A game theoretic model for analysis of material reuse modularity. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, J., Du, W., Yang, F., Hua, G.: Evolutionary game analysis of remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain with asymmetric information. Sustainability. 6(9), 6312–6324 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sabbaghi, M., Behdad, S., Zhuang, J.: Managing consumer behavior toward on-time return of the waste electrical and electronic equipment: a game theoretic approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 182, 545–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, X., Bai, X., Fan, Z., Liu, T.: Game analysis and coordination of a closed-loop supply chain: perspective of components reuse strategy. Sustainability 12(22), 9681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, Z.F.: Research on pricing decision of multi-level remanufacturing reverse supply chain based on Stackelberg game. Appl. Mech. Mater. 220–223, 290–293 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.220-223.290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bekius, F., Meijer, S., Thomassen, H.: A real case application of game theoretical concepts in a complex decision-making process: case study ERTMS. Group Decis. Negot. 31(1), 153–185 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09762-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagayama, D., Horita, M.: A network game analysis of strategic interactions in the international trade of Russian natural gas through Ukraine and Belarus. Energy Econ. 43, 89–101 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma, J., Hipel, K.W., Hanson, M.L., Cai, X., Liu, Y.: An analysis of influencing factors on municipal solid waste source-separated collection behavior in Guilin, China by Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustain. Cities Soc. 37, 336–343 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma, J., Hipel, K.W., Hanson, M.L.: Public participation in municipal solid waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China: status and influencing factors. J. Environ. Planning Manage. 60(12), 2174–2191 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacso, P.: As we may search - Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Curr. Sci. 89(9), 1537–1547 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 359–377 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sousa, M.J., Rocha, Á.: Decision-making and negotiation in innovation; research in information science. Group Decis. Negot. 30(2), 267–275 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Software survey: VOS viewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gu, Y., et al.: Environmental performance analysis on resource multiple-life-cycle recycling system: Evidence from waste pet bottles in China. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 158, 104821 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nie, Z., Gao, F., Gong, X., Wang, Z., Zuo, T.: Recent progress and application of materials life cycle assessment in China. Progr. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 21(1), 1–11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60016-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chu, X., Shi, Z., Yang, L., Guo, S.: Evolutionary game analysis on improving collaboration in sustainable urban regeneration: a multiple-stakeholder perspective. J. Urban Planning Dev. 146(4), 04020046 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000630

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the unity and cooperation of our team.

Disclosure of Interests. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ma, J., Wang, D., Li, H., Guo, Z. (2024). Developing a Multi-phase Stakeholder Game Framework for Recyclable Resource Management System. In: Campos Ferreira, M., Wachowicz, T., Zaraté, P., Maemura, Y. (eds) Human-Centric Decision and Negotiation Support for Societal Transitions. GDN 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 509. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59372-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59373-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics