Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly shifted the traditional workspace to the domestic environment. Social isolation inspires us to consider telepresence technologies to reshape our working experience. This study is inspired by the psychological concept of social facilitation and explores its implementation in telepresence robots. A telepresence robot representing somebody with minimal cues was designed and tested in our experiment on a puzzle task. We suspect a facilitative effect of the robot on the participants’ work efficiency and self-efficacy through its social presence. To evaluate the design, different modalities of the “observer” were set up as different experiment conditions. The initial result shows no significant social facilitation effect. However, this study contributes to the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of robots in remote work environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van Zoonen, W., Sivunen, A.E.: The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 31, 610–621 (2022)
Augstein, M., Neumayr, T., Schönböck, J., Kovacs, C.: Remote persons are closer than they appear: home, team and a lockdown. In: Proceedings of CHI 2023 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York (2023)
Bleakley, A., et al.: Bridging social distance during social distancing: exploring social talk and remote collegiality in video conferencing. Human-Comp. Interact. 37, 404–432 (2022)
Miller, C., Rodeghero, P., Storey, M.-A., Ford, D., Zimmermann, T.: “How was your weekend?” Software development teams working from home during covid-19. In: Proceedings of ICSE 2021 International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE, New York (2021)
Röcker, C.: Informal communication and awareness in virtual teams – why we need smart technologies to support distributed teamwork. Commun. Inf. Sci. Manage. Eng. 2, 1–15 (2012)
Muratbekova-Touron, M., Leon, E.: “Is there anybody out there?” Using a telepresence robot to engage in face time at the office. Inf. Technol. People 36, 48–65 (2023)
Guerin, B.: Social Facilitation. Cambridge University Press (1993)
Cominelli, L., et al.: Promises and trust in human–robot interaction. Sci. Rep. 11, 9687 (2021)
Paulos, E., Canny, J.: Ubiquitous tele-embodiment: applications and implications. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 861–877 (1997)
Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Severinson Eklundh, K., Loutfi, A.: Sense of presence in a robotic telepresence domain. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Users Diversity, pp. 479–487. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21663-3_51
Sugiyama, J., Tsetserukou, D., Miura, J.: NAVIgoid: robot navigation with haptic vision. In: Proceedings of SA 2011 SIGGRAPH Asia. ACM. New York (2011)
Choi, J.J., Kwak, S.S.: You are my robot: the impact of synchronized motion cues on receivers. Int. J. Control Autom. 9, 249–258 (2016)
Almeida, L., Menezes, P., Dias, J.: Telepresence social robotics towards co-presence: a review. Appl. Sci. 12(11), 5557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115557
Hwang, A.H.-C., Won, A.S.: Ideabot: investigating social facilitation in human-machine team creativity. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2021 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16. ACM, New York (2021)
Spatola, N., Huguet, P.: Cognitive impact of anthropomorphized robot gaze: anthropomorphic gaze as social cues. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 10, 1–14 (2021)
Lee, M.K., Takayama, L.: “Now, i have a body”: uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York (2011)
Schouten, A.P., Portegies, T.C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L.M., Mazerant-Dubois, K.: Robomorphism: examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Comp. Human Behav. 126, 106980 (2022)
Biocca, F.: The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J. Comp.-Mediated Commun. 3(2), (1997)
Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1, 120–126 (1992)
Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42, 73–93 (1992)
Allport, F.H.: The influence of the group upon association and thought. J. Exp. Psychol. 3, 159–182 (1920)
Uziel, L.: Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: a review and meta-analysis. J. Res. Pers. 41, 579–601 (2007)
Nowak, K., Biocca, F.: The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleop. Virt. 12, 481–494 (2003)
Slater, M., Steed, A.: Meeting people virtually: experiments in shared virtual environments. In: Schroeder, R. (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments, pp. 146–171. Springer, London (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0277-9_9
Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 3549–3557 (2009)
Allmendinger, K.: Social presence in synchronous virtual learning situations: the role of nonverbal signals displayed by avatars. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 41–56 (2010)
Oh, C.S., Bailenson, J.N., Welch, G.F.: A systematic review of social presence: definition, antecedents, and implications. Front. Robot. AI 5, 114 (2018)
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 319–330 (2009)
Triplett, N.: The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. Am. J. Psychol. 9, 507–533 (1898)
Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)
Baron, R.A.: Distraction-conflict theory: an integration of attention, arousal and expectancy. Psychol. Rev. 93, 29–49 (1986)
Cottrell, N.B.: T. In: McClintock, C.G. (ed.) Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 185–236. Holt McDougal, New York (1972)
Zajonc, R.B.: Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 35, 151–175 (1980)
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F.: Attention and self-regulation: a control-theory approach to human behavior. In: Harvey, J.H., Ickes, W.J., Kidd, R.F. (eds.) New directions in psychology: Vol. 1. Basic processes in self-control and motivation, pp. 1–30. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1981)
Koban, K., Haggadone, B.A., Banks, J.: The observant android: Limited social facilitation and inhibition from a copresent social robot. Technol. Mind Behav. 2 (2021)
Irfan, B., Kennedy, J., Lemaignan, S., Papadopoulos, F., Senft, E., Belpaeme, T.: Social psychology and human-robot interaction: an uneasy marriage. In: Proceedings of HRI 2018 International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York (2018)
Sterna, R., Strojny, P., Rębilas, K.: Can virtual observers affect our behavior? Social facilitation in virtual environments: a mini-review. Soc. Psychol. Bull. (2019)
Lin, C.-H., Chen, C.: Developing spatial visualization and mental rotation with a digital puzzle game at primary school level. Comp. Human Behav. 57, 23–30 (2016)
Chesham, A., et al.: Search and match task: development of a taskified match-3 puzzle game to assess and practice visual search. Serious Games 7, e13620 (2019)
Fissler, P., Küster, O., Laptinskaya, D., Loy, L., Arnim, C.V., von, Kolassa, I.: Jigsaw puzzling taps multiple cognitive abilities and is a potential protective factor for cognitive aging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10, 299 (2018)
Garcia, A.C.: An explorer in a cardboard land: emotion, memory, and the embodied experience of doing jigsaw puzzles. Int. J. Play. 5, 166–180 (2016)
Chen, G., Gully, S.M., Eden, D.: Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ. Res. Methods 4, 62–83 (2001)
Biocca, F., Harms, C., Gregg, J.: The networked minds measure of social presence: pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In: 4th annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia (2001)
Acknowledgment
This paper is funded by the National Science and Technology Council, R.O.C. Taiwan (NSTC112–2410-H-006–075-).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jhang, K., Chien, WC. (2024). A Telepresence Robot Partner for Remote Work: An Exploration into Design and Its Psychological Effect. In: Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14685. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60411-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60412-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)