Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Crowdsourcing Approach for Identifying Potential Stereotypes in the Collected Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14703))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 521 Accesses

Abstract

Data generation through crowdsourcing has become a common practice for building or augmenting an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system. These systems often reflect the stereotypical behaviors expressed by humans through the reported data, which can be problematic, especially when dealing with sensitive tasks. One such task is the interpretation of images depicting people. In this work, we evaluate a crowdsourcing approach aimed at identifying the stereotypes conveyed in the collected annotations on people images. By including closed-ended, categorical responses as well as open-ended tags during the data collection phase, we can detect potentially harmful crowd behaviors. Our results suggest a means to assess descriptive tags, as to their alignment with stereotypical beliefs related to gender, age, and body weight. This study concludes with a discussion on how our analytical approach can be applied to pre-existing datasets with similar characteristics or to future knowledge being crowdsourced such as to audit for stereotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en.

  2. 2.

    https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html.

  3. 3.

    https://www.clickworker.com/.

  4. 4.

    Sample images can be found at: https://www.chicagofaces.org/.

  5. 5.

    Our research protocol has undergone ethical review and received approval by the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee.

References

  1. Barlas, P., Kyriakou, K., Guest, O., Kleanthous, S., Otterbacher, J.: To “See” is to Stereotype: image tagging algorithms, gender recognition, and the accuracy-fairness trade-off. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4(CSCW3), 232:1–232:31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432931

  2. Barlas, P., Kyriakou, K., Kleanthous, S., Otterbacher, J.: Social b (eye) as: human and machine descriptions of people images. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 13, pp. 583–591 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chrisler, J.C.: “Why can’t you control yourself?’’ Fat should be a feminist issue. Sex Roles 66(9–10), 608–616 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E.: What is beautiful is good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 24(3), 285 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Draws, T., Rieger, A., Inel, O., Gadiraju, U., Tintarev, N.: A checklist to combat cognitive biases in crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, vol. 9, pp. 48–59 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gadiraju, U., Kawase, R., Dietze, S.: A taxonomy of microtasks on the web. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 218–223 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gadiraju, U., Kawase, R., Dietze, S., Demartini, G.: Understanding malicious behavior in crowdsourcing platforms: The case of online surveys. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1631–1640 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gebru, T., et al.: Datasheets for datasets. Commun. ACM 64(12), 86–92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3458723

  9. Hube, C., Fetahu, B., Gadiraju, U.: Understanding and mitigating worker biases in the crowdsourced collection of subjective judgments. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’19, pp. 1–12. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300637

  10. Hussain, M., Naz, A., Khan, W., Daraz, U., Khan, Q.: Gender stereotyping in family: an institutionalized and normative mechanism in Pakhtun society of Pakistan. SAGE Open 5(3), 2158244015595258 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamar, E., Kapoor, A., Horvitz, E.: Identifying and accounting for task-dependent bias in crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, vol. 3 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kay, M., Matuszek, C., Munson, S.A.: Unequal representation and gender stereotypes in image search results for occupations. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’15, pp. 3819–3828. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520

  13. Lay, J.C., Holman, M.R., Bos, A.L., Greenlee, J.S., Oxley, Z.M., Buffett, A.: Time for kids to learn gender stereotypes: analysis of gender and political leadership in a common social studies resource for children. Polit. Gender 17(1), 1–22 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung, W., et al.: Race, gender and beauty: the effect of information provision on online hiring biases. CHI ’20, pp. 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376874

  15. Liang, W., et al.: Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy AI. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4(8), 669–677 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, D.S., Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B.: The Chicago face database: a free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behav. Res. Methods 47(4), 1122–1135 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magno, G., Araújo, C.S., Meira Jr., W., Almeida, V.: Stereotypes in search engine results: understanding the role of local and global factors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05413 (2016)

  18. Matsangidou, M., Otterbacher, J.: What is beautiful continues to be good: people images and algorithmic inferences on physical attractiveness. In: Lamas, D., Loizides, F., Nacke, L., Petrie, H., Winckler, M., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) INTERACT 2019. LNCS, vol. 11749, pp. 243–264. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29390-1_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Orphanou, K., et al.: Mitigating bias in algorithmic systems-a fish-eye view. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(5) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3527152

  20. Otterbacher, J., Bates, J., Clough, P.: Competent men and warm women: gender stereotypes and backlash in image search results. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 6620–6631. ACM, Denver Colorado USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025727, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3025453.3025727

  21. Perikleous, P., et al.: How does the crowd impact the model? A tool for raising awareness of social bias in crowdsourced training data. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 4951–4954 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puhl, R.M., Heuer, C.A.: The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17(5), 941–964 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seacat, J.D., Mickelson, K.D.: Stereotype threat and the exercise/dietary health intentions of overweight women. J. Health Psychol. 14(4), 556–567 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shinners, E.: Effects of the “what is beautiful is good” stereotype on perceived trustworthiness. UW-L J. Undergraduate Res. 12, 1–5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tan, A.S., Li, S., Simpson, C.: American tv and social stereotypes of Americans in Taiwan and Mexico. Journal. Q. 63(4), 809–814 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tortajada-Giménez, I., Araüna-Baró, N., Martínez-Martínez, I.J.: Advertising stereotypes and gender representation in social networking sites. Comunicar 21(41), 177–186 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veletsianos, G.: Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 576–585 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the Cyprus Research and Innovation Foundation under grant EXCELLENCE/0421/0360 (KeepA(n)I), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 739578 (RISE), and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus through the Deputy Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digital Policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgenia Christoforou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Christoforou, E., Orphanou, K., Kyriacou, M., Otterbacher, J. (2024). A Crowdsourcing Approach for Identifying Potential Stereotypes in the Collected Data. In: Coman, A., Vasilache, S. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14703. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61281-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics