Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Development of UX Evaluation Tool in Digital Media Content Production: Focusing on the Mobile Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing (SAI 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 1018))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

In the burgeoning field of digital media content production, small creator groups often grapple with the intricacies of User Experience (UX) design and analysis. Recognizing this challenge, this study was initiated with the ambition of serving as a foundational reference for these groups. The research foregrounded the derivation of four principal UX evaluation factors and a more detailed set of 16 subsidiary factors, achieved through collaborative sessions with six distinguished UX specialists. To discern the relative significance of each factor, a segmented survey approach was employed, targeting three key demographics: planners, designers, and developers. This stratification enabled a nuanced understanding of perceptual disparities across these groups. Our findings illuminate the heterogeneous prioritizations amongst these groups and provide insights into their unique UX perspectives. Moreover, leveraging the derived importance values, the study culminates in the formulation of a pragmatic evaluation instrument envisioned for future projects. The implications of this research are twofold: it offers a structured framework for UX assessment in digital media and underscores the need for collaborative and interdisciplinary approaches in realizing optimal user experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho, C.S.: A Study on the Flow Factors for Personalization of Smartphone GUI Design. Hanyang University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cho, C.S.: Study on the course of smart phones GUI UX and experiences design elements. J. Digit. Des. 14(2), 545–554 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cho, S.-H., Kim, S.-H.: Suggestion for collaboration-based UI/UX development model through risk analysis. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 16(6), 1372–1390 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dewey, J.: Democracy and education (1916). Middle Works 9, 4–58 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hashim, M.E.A., Idris, M.Z., Said, C.S.: Defining the construct and elements of aesthetic experience (AX) and user experience (UX) in augmented reality comics (AR Comics). Int. J. Creat. Multimedia 3(1), 17–34 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, B.A., Goundar, M.S., Chand, S.S.: A framework for heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(4), 3189–3204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10112-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maguire, M., Isherwood, P.: A comparison of user testing and heuristic evaluation methods for identifying website usability problems. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2018. LNCS, vol. 10918, pp. 429–438. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_31

  8. Marhavilas, P.K., Filippidis, M., Koulinas, G.K., Koulouriotis, D.E.: Safety-assessment by hybridizing the MCDM/AHP & HAZOP-DMRA techniques through safety’s level colored maps: implementation in a petrochemical industry. Alex. Eng. J. 61(9), 6959–6977 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neo, J.R.J., Won, A.S., Shepley, M.M.: Designing immersive virtual environments for human behavior research [systematic review]. Front. Virtual Real. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.603750

  10. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pacheco, J., Garbatov, S., Goulão, M.: Improving collaboration efficiency between UX/UI designers and developers in a low-code platform. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pant, S., et al.: AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for monitoring health management practices in smart healthcare system. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-01904-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park, J.-H., Lee, J.: Effect of the affordance characteristics of VR game UI on the user experience. J. Korea Inst. Inf. Commun. Eng. 24(2), 252–258 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Praja, F.P.A., Afwani, R., Sutoyo, E., Suryani, E., Diswandi, D.: Enhancing website design: the implementation of sequential monadic concept testing on user interface and user experience design. In: 2023 International Conference on Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information System (ICADEIS) (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reed, E.S.: The Necessity of Experience. Yale University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers, Y.S., Preece, H.J.: Interaction Design Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority. Resource Allocation. RWS Publications, USA (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., Diakopoulos, N.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stige, Ã…., Zamani, E.D., Mikalef, P., Zhu, Y.: Artificial intelligence (AI) for user experience (UX) design: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Inf. Technol. People (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tavana, M., Soltanifar, M., Santos-Arteaga, F.J.: Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution. Ann. Oper. Res. 326(2), 879–907 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04432-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsou, M.-H.: Revisiting web cartography in the United States: the rise of user-centered design. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 38(3), 250–257 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, C.-M., Huang, C.-H.: A study of usability principles and interface design for mobile e-books. Ergonomics 58(8), 1253–1265 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Z., Changwook, L.: A comparative study on UI design of Korea-China mobile sleep application. J. Commun. Des., 459–472 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yun, J.J., Liu, Z., Zhao, X.: Introduction: ambidextrous open innovation in the 4th industrial revolution. Sci. Technol. Soc. 26(2), 183–200 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jounghyung Cho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jang, S., Cho, J. (2024). Development of UX Evaluation Tool in Digital Media Content Production: Focusing on the Mobile Environment. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 1018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62269-4_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics