Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Applications and Economic Profiles of the Turnkey Contract Business Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops (ICCSA 2024)

Abstract

The real estate sector, particularly in Europe, plays a significant role in energy consumption, with older and post-World War II buildings contributing most to air emissions. To address this, the European Union has implemented directives since 2002, emphasizing energy efficiency in both existing and new buildings. In response, European countries’ governments have introduced incentives to encourage efficiency in existing facilities and the construction of new, high-efficiency buildings. This has led to the development of innovative and sustainable business models, notably the Turnkey Contract model, originating from the United States and exclusively used for new constructions.

This article comprehensively analyses the Turnkey Contract business model, focusing on 11 European case studies from Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain. The study employs Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) and K-modes cluster analysis to identify economic profiles associated with this model. The results reveal two distinct clusters: one with private ownership, smaller-scale buildings for private use, and a construction company as the main contractor; the other with public ownership, larger-scale buildings for public use, and an architecture/engineering firm as the main contractor.

The analysis also highlights commonalities between the two clusters identified, such as a project duration of 1–3 years, energy class A properties, and subsidized interventions like insulation and renewable energy installations. The study provides insights into how ownership structure and intended use influence the variations in the Turnkey Contract business model, offering a foundational exploration for future research to consider economic, financial, and cultural specificities across European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mironiuc, M., Ionașcu, E., Huian, M.C., Țaran, A.: Reflecting the sustainability dimensions on the residential real estate prices. Sustainability 13(5) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052963

  2. Vanags, J., Butane, I.: Major aspects of development of sustainable investment environment in real estate industry. Procedia Eng. 57, 1223–1229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2013.04.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsch, J., Spanner, M., Bienert, S.: The carbon risk real estate monitor - developing a framework for science-based decarbonizing and reducing stranding risks within the commercial real estate sector. J. Sustain. Real Estate 11(1), 174–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22300/1949-8276.11.1.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Shuai, C., Shen, G.Q.: Green retrofit of aged residential buildings in Hong Kong: a preliminary study. Build. Environ. 143, 89–98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2018.06.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Copiello, S., et al.: Building industry and energy efficiency: a review of three major issues at stake. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Garau, C., Blečić, I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Tarantino, E., Torre, C.M. (eds.) ICCSA 2021. LNCS, vol. 12954, pp. 226–240. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_17

  6. Copiello, S., Donati, E.: Is investing in energy efficiency worth it? evidence for substantial price premiums but limited profitability in the housing sector. Energy Build 251, 111371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DIRECTIVE 2002/91/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings

    Google Scholar 

  8. DIRECTIVE 2010/91/EU of 10 December 2010 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include as active substance and amending Decision 2008/934/EC, EFSA Journal, vol. 8, no. 5. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, May 01 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1592

  9. DIRECTIVE 2012/27/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Directive (EU) 2018/844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (Text with EEA relevance)

    Google Scholar 

  11. I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2023/1791 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 (recast) (Text with EEA relevance)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuzemko, C.: Re-scaling IPE: local government, sustainable energy and change. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 26(1), 80–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1527239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., Evans, S.: A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 13(5), 482–497 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Munaro, M.R., do C. D. Freitas, M., Tavares, S.F., Bragança, L.: Circular business models: current state and framework to achieve sustainable buildings. J. Constr Eng. Manag. 147(12), 04021164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002184

  15. Morioka, S.N., Evans, S., de Carvalho, M.M.: Sustainable business model innovation: exploring evidences in sustainability reporting. Procedia CIRP 40, 659–667 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boons, F., Lüdeke-Freund, F.: Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 9–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, X., Pan, W., Lu, W.: Business model innovation for delivering zero carbon buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 27, 253–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stubbs, W., Cocklin, C.: Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model.’ Organ. Environ. 21(2), 103–127 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, A.: Turunen, Mäntymäki, and Heikkilä, platform-based business models: insights from an emerging Ai-enabled smart building ecosystem. Electronics (Basel) 8(10), 1150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8101150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ensign, P., Roy, S., Brzustowski, T.: Decisions by key office building stakeholders to build or retrofit green in toronto’s urban core. Sustainability 13(12), 6969 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leising, E., Quist, J., Bocken, N.: Circular economy in the building sector: three cases and a collaboration tool. J. Clean. Prod. 176, 976–989 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Antonini, E., Longo, D., Gianfrate, V., Copiello, S.: Challenges for public-private partnerships in improving energy efficiency of building sector. Int. J. Housing Sci. Appl. 40 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sovacool, B.K., Turnheim, B., Martiskainen, M., Brown, D., Kivimaa, P.: Guides or gatekeepers? incumbent-oriented transition intermediaries in a low-carbon era. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 66, 101490 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tronchin, L., Manfren, M., Nastasi, B.: Energy efficiency, demand side management and energy storage technologies – a critical analysis of possible paths of integration in the built environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 95, 341–353 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Donati, E., Copiello, S.: The one-stop shop business model for improving building energy efficiency: analysis and applications. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, pp. 422–439 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37111-0_30

  26. Schneider, M.E.: Turnkey Contracts - Concepts, liabilities, claims. In: The international Construction law Review, in 4, vol. 3. LLYOD’S OF LONDON PRESS LTD (1986). https://www.lalive.law/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/mes_turnkey_contracts.pdf

  27. Ralston, A., Reilly, E.D.: Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merna, A., Smith, N.: Project managers and the use of Turnkey contracts. Int. J. Project Manage. 8(3), 183–189 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(90)90021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Doe, J., Nitek, D., Minamikata, N., Smith Freehills, H.: Construction Arbitration and Turnkey Projects, Construction Arbitration and Turnkey Projects (2021). https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-construction-arbitration/fourth-edition/article/construction-arbitration-and-turnkey-projects

  30. Encinas, F., Marmolejo-Duarte, C., Sánchez de la Flor, F., Aguirre, C.: Does energy efficiency matter to real estate-consumers? survey evidence on willingness to pay from a cost-optimal analysis in the context of a developing country. Energy Sustain. Dev. 45, 110–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2018.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Christopher Gordon, B.M.: Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar Guha, S.: Turnkey Construction Contracts in Construction and Infrastructure Projects: An Introductory Overview 11(2) (2020). http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Turnkey+Construction+Contract

  33. Olsson, S., Malmqvist, T., Glaumann, M.: Managing sustainability aspects in renovation processes: Interview study and outline of a process model. Sustainability (Switzerland) 7(6), 6336–6352 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rodney, M., Mshali, M., Aldridge, M.D.: Public Infrastructure Financing Using EPC (Engineer-Procure-Construct)/Turnkey Contracts

    Google Scholar 

  35. Solimene, F.: Use of FIDIC forms in the oil and gas construction sector and possible amendments to the yellow and silver books. J. World Energy Law Bus. 7(6), 558–571 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwu035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guha, S.K.: Turnkey construction contracts in construction and infrastructure projects: an introductory overview. Indian J. Law Justice 11(2), 211–224 (2020). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85169149600&partnerID=40&md5=22e282abd7f9e3386e7b88d449053cf8

  37. Greenacre, M.J.: Correspondence analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2(5), 613–619 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Moschidis, O.E.: A different approach to multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) than that of specific MCA. Mathématiques et Sci. Humaines 186, 77–88 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4000/msh.11091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abdi, H., Valentin, D.: Multiple Correspondence Analysis. http://www.utd.edu/

  40. Ahmed, M., Seraj, R., Islam, S.M.S.: The k-means algorithm: a comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. Electronics (Basel) 9(8) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081295

  41. Ding, C., He, X.: K-means clustering via principal component analysis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, in ICML 2004. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015408

  42. Na, S., Xumin, L., Yong, G.: Research on k-means clustering algorithm: an improved k-means clustering algorithm. In: 2010 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics, pp. 63–67 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1109/IITSI.2010.74

  43. Kanungo, T., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Piatko, C.D., Silverman, R., Wu, A.Y.: An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(7), 881–892 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, J., Xiong, H., Chen, J.: Adapting the right measures for K-Means Clustering. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, in KDD 2009. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 877–886 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557115

  45. Morissette, L., Chartier, S.: The k-means clustering technique: General considerations and implementation in Mathematica. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 9(1), 15–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.1.p015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chaturvedi, A., Green, P.E., Caroll, J.D.: K-modes Clustering. J. Classif. 18(1), 35–55 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-001-0004-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Dorman, K.S., Maitra, R.: An efficient k-modes algorithm for clustering categorical datasets. Stat. Anal. Data Min. 15(1), 83–97 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11546

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Carreira-Perpiñán, M.A., Wang, W.: The K-modes algorithm for clustering (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6478

  49. Goyal, M., Aggarwal, S.: A review on K-Mode clustering algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 8(7). https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v8i7.4301

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edda Donati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Donati, E., Copiello, S., Bonifaci, P. (2024). Applications and Economic Profiles of the Turnkey Contract Business Model. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Garau, C., Taniar, D., C. Rocha, A.M.A., Faginas Lago, M.N. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops. ICCSA 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65273-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65273-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-65272-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-65273-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics