Abstract
This paper identifies and validates the challenges hindering the integration of circular economy into evidence-based policy making, and proposes an outlook for enhancing the effective use of circular economy monitors. It highlights the limitations of current circular economy monitoring systems, which often fail to transform circular economy information into actionable knowledge for policy makers. Using the echelon Design Science Research approach, which divides projects into manageable ‘echelons’ to tackle complex socio-technical problems, this study focuses on the problem analysis echelon. Through 13 semi-structured interviews with intended users and an extensive literature review, the study identifies and validates five challenges to embedding circular economy in policy-making. These challenges are the delayed benefits of circular economy actions, fragmented policy coordination, the lack of a policy agenda for higher R strategies, the complexity of circular economy implementation, and the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical policy needs. This analysis is grounded in the theory of effective use as our Kernel Theory. To address the ineffective use of circular economy monitors, the study proposes an outlook of design requirements and design principles. This paper contributes to the literature on policy monitoring frameworks and circular economy policymaking by delineating a validated problem space that future researchers can use to improve the effective use of circular economy monitors in policymaking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reichel, A., De Schoenmakere, M., Gillabel, J., Martin, J., Hoogeveen, Y.: Circular economy in Europe: Developing the knowledge base. Eur Environ. Agency Rep. 2, 2016 (2016)
Milios, L.: Advancing to a circular economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustain. Sci. 13, 861–878 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9
Völker, T., Kovacic, Z., Strand, R.: Indicator development as a site of collective imagination? The case of European commission policies on the circular economy. Cult. Organ. 26, 103–120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1699092
Recker, J.: Toward a design theory for green information systems. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4474–4483. IEEE (2016)
Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., Thomas, J.: A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Alaerts, L., Reich, R.H., Pauwels, M., Van Acker, K.: Embedding a circular economy monitor in public administration (2024)
Alaerts, L., et al.: Towards a more direct policy feedback in circular economy monitoring via a societal needs perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 149, 363–371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.004
Tuunanen, T., Winter, R., vom Brocke, J.: Dealing with complexity in design science research: a methodology using design echelons. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 48, 427–458 (2024)
Burton-Jones, A., Grange, C.: From use to effective use: a representation theory perspective. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 632–658 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0444
European Commission: Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the circular economy (2015)
Alberich, J.P., Pansera, M., Hartley, S.: Understanding the EU’s circular economy policies through futures of circularity. J. Clean. Prod. 385, 135723 (2023)
Hartley, K., Schülzchen, S., Bakker, C.A., Kirchherr, J.: A policy framework for the circular economy: Lessons from the EU. J. Clean. Prod. 412, 137176 (2023)
Esty, D., Rushing, R.: The promise of data-driven policymaking. Issues Sci. Technol. 23, 67–72 (2007)
Mügge, D.: Studying macroeconomic indicators as powerful ideas. J. Eur. Publ. Policy 23, 410–427 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115537
Van Veenstra, A.F., Kotterink, B.: Data-driven policy making: the policy lab approach. In: Parycek, P., et al. (eds.) EPart 2017. LNCS, vol. 10429, pp. 100–111. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_9
Diran, D., Van Veenstra, A.F.: Towards data-driven policymaking for the urban heat transition in The Netherlands: barriers to the collection and use of data. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12219, pp. 361–373. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_27
Diran, D., Hoekstra, M., Van Veenstra, A.F.: Applications of data-driven policymaking in the local energy transition: a multiple-case study in the Netherlands. In: Krimmer, R., Rohde Johannessen, M., Lampoltshammer, T., Lindgren, I., Parycek, P., Schwabe, G., Ubacht, J. (eds.) EPart 2022. LNCS, vol. 13392, pp. 55–72. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23213-8_4
Head, B.W.: Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Aust. J. Public Adm. 67, 1–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
Janssen, M., Helbig, N.: Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: policy-makers be prepared! Gov. Inf. Q. 35, S99–S105 (2018)
Head, B.W.: Reconsidering evidence-based policy: key issues and challenges. Policy Soc. 29, 77–94 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
Young, I., et al.: Experiences and attitudes towards evidence-informed policy-making among research and policy stakeholders in the C Anadian agri-food public health sector. Zoonoses Public Health 61, 581–589 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12108
Bangert, H.: Japan’s circularity. A panorama of Japanese policy innovation technology and industry contributions towards achieving the Paris agreement. Report, EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation (2020)
Geng, Y., Doberstein, B.: Developing the circular economy in China: challenges and opportunities for achieving “leapfrog development”. Int J Sust Dev World 15, 231–239 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6
Magnier, C., et al.: Ten key indicators for monitoring the circular economy. Environmental Information Department, Ministry of the Environment, Energy and Marine Affairs, France (2017). http://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/publications/p/2669/1539/10-indicateurs-cles-suivi-leconomie-circulaire-edition-2017.html. Accessed 2 Oct 2018
Potting, J., Hanemaaijer, A., Delahaye, R., Ganzevles, J., Hoekstra, R., Lijzen, J.: Circular economy: what we want to know and can measure. Framework and baseline assessment for monitoring the progress of the circular economy in the Netherlands, p. 92 (2018)
Mayer, A., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., Krausmann, F., Nuss, P., Blengini, G.A.: Measuring progress towards a circular economy: a monitoring framework for economy-wide material loop closing in the EU28. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 62–76 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12809
Vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., Maedche, A.: Special issue editorial–accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 9 (2020)
Weber, R.: Ontological foundations of information systems. (No Title) (1997)
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., Maheshwari, D.: Data science empowering the public: data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 37, 101284 (2020)
Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., Grin, J.: Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy. Sci. 42, 275–302 (2009)
Friant, M.C., Vermeulen, W.J., Salomone, R.: Analysing European union circular economy policies: words versus actions. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 27, 337–353 (2021)
Hartley, K., van Santen, R., Kirchherr, J.: Policies for transitioning towards a circular economy: expectations from the European Union (EU). Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 155, 104634 (2020)
Kautto, P., Lazarevic, D.: Between a policy mix and a policy mess: policy instruments and instrumentation for the circular economy. In: Handbook of the Circular Economy, pp. 207–223. Edward Elgar Publishing (2020)
Weber, K.M., Rohracher, H.: Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res. Policy 41, 1037–1047 (2012)
Fitch-Roy, O., Benson, D., Monciardini, D.: Going around in circles? Conceptual recycling, patching and policy layering in the EU circular economy package. Environ. Polit. 29, 983–1003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1673996
Zeiss, R., Ixmeier, A., Recker, J., Kranz, J.: Mobilising information systems scholarship for a circular economy: review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Inf. Syst. J. 31, 148–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12305
Yu, Y., Junjan, V., Yazan, D.M., Iacob, M.-E.: A systematic literature review on Circular Economy implementation in the construction industry: a policy-making perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 183, 106359 (2022)
Liu, Y., Wood, L.C., Venkatesh, V.G., Zhang, A., Farooque, M.: Barriers to sustainable food consumption and production in China: a fuzzy DEMA℡ analysis from a circular economy perspective. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 28, 1114–1129 (2021)
Peleg Mizrachi, M., Tal, A.: Regulation for promoting sustainable, fair and circular fashion. Sustainability. 14, 502 (2022)
Soenmez, C., Venkatachalam, V., Spierling, S., Endres, H.-J., Barner, L.: Environmental potential of recycling of plastic wastes in Australia based on life cycle assessment. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 26, 755–775 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01901-1
Yuille, A., et al.: UK government policy and the transition to a circular nutrient economy. Sustainability. 14, 3310 (2022)
Moraga, G., et al.: Circular economy indicators: what do they measure? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 146, 452–461 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045
Chandra, L., Seidel, S., Gregor, S.: Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4039–4048. IEEE (2015)
Acknowledgments
M. Pauwels is grateful for KU Leuven’s funding provided by VITO (Grant No: 3E230665). R. H. Reich is grateful for the internal C2-funding of KU Leuven (Grant No: 3E210013). L. Alaerts is grateful for the financial support received from the Flemish administration via CE Center (Steunpunt Circulaire Economie) This publication contains the opinions of the authors, not those of the Flemish administration. The Flemish administration will not carry any liability with respect to the use that can be made of the produced data or conclusions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pauwels, M., Reich, R., Vercalsteren, A., Christis, M., Alaerts, L., van Acker, K. (2024). Understanding the Problem Space for Effective Use of a Circular Economy Monitor in Policy Making. In: Johannessen, M.R., et al. Electronic Participation. ePart 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70804-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70804-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-70803-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-70804-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)