Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Nonrigid Reconstruction of Freehand Ultrasound Without a Tracker

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2024 (MICCAI 2024)

Abstract

Reconstructing 2D freehand Ultrasound (US) frames into 3D space without using a tracker has recently seen advances with deep learning. Predicting good frame-to-frame rigid transformations is often accepted as the learning objective, especially when the ground-truth labels from spatial tracking devices are inherently rigid transformations. Motivated by a) the observed nonrigid deformation due to soft tissue motion during scanning, and b) the highly sensitive prediction of rigid transformation, this study investigates the methods and their benefits in predicting nonrigid transformations for reconstructing 3D US. We propose a novel co-optimisation algorithm for simultaneously estimating rigid transformations among US frames, supervised by ground-truth from a tracker, and a nonrigid deformation, optimised by a regularised registration network. We show that these two objectives can be either optimised using meta-learning or combined by weighting. A fast scattered data interpolation is also developed for enabling frequent reconstruction and registration of non-parallel US frames, during training. With a new data set containing over 357,000 frames in 720 scans, acquired from 60 subjects, the experiments demonstrate that, due to an expanded thus easier-to-optimise solution space, the generalisation is improved with the added deformation estimation, with respect to the rigid ground-truth. The global pixel reconstruction error (assessing accumulative prediction) is lowered from 18.48 to 16.51 mm, compared with baseline rigid-transformation-predicting methods. Using manually identified landmarks, the proposed co-optimisation also shows potentials in compensating nonrigid tissue motion at inference, which is not measurable by tracker-provided ground-truth. The code and data used in this paper are made publicly available at https://github.com/QiLi111/NR-Rec-FUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The interpolation process has an average speed of less than 1 ms over the dataset.

  2. 2.

    This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of local institution (UCL Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering) on \(20^{th}\) Jan. 2023 [24055/001].

References

  1. Amidror, I.: Scattered data interpolation methods for electronic imaging systems: a survey. Journal of electronic imaging 11(2), 157–176 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., et al.: Voxelmorph: a learning framework for deformable medical image registration. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 38(8), 1788–1800 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartier, P.M., Keller, C.P.: Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (idw). Computers & Geosciences 22(7), 795–799 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J.F., Fowlkes, J.B., et al.: Determination of scan-plane motion using speckle decorrelation: Theoretical considerations and initial test. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 8(1), 38–44 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebner, M., Chouhan, M., et al.: Point-spread-function-aware slice-to-volume registration: application to upper abdominal mri super-resolution. In: Reconstruction, Segmentation, and Analysis of Medical Images: First International Workshops, RAMBO 2016 and HVSMR 2016. pp. 3–13. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, H., Chao, H., et al.: Ultrasound volume reconstruction from freehand scans without tracking. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 70(3), 970–979 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, Y., Gibson, E., et al.: Freehand ultrasound image simulation with spatially-conditioned generative adversarial networks. In: Molecular imaging, reconstruction and analysis of moving body organs, and stroke imaging and treatment, pp. 105–115. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu, Y., Modat, M., et al.: Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration. Medical image analysis 49, 1–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, H., Cui, C., et al.: Grid interpolation algorithm based on nearest neighbor fast search. Earth Science Informatics 5, 181–187 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaderberg, M., Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., kavukcuoglu, k.: Spatial transformer networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 28. Curran Associates, Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lang, A., Mousavi, P., et al.: Multi-modal registration of speckle-tracked freehand 3d ultrasound to ct in the lumbar spine. Medical image analysis 16(3), 675–686 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lasso, A., Heffter, T., et al.: Plus: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 61(10), 2527–2537 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leblanc, T., Lalys, F., et al.: Stretched reconstruction based on 2d freehand ultrasound for peripheral artery imaging. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 17(7), 1281–1288 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, S., Wolberg, G., et al.: Scattered data interpolation with multilevel b-splines. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 3(3), 228–244 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Q., Shen, Z., et al.: Privileged anatomical and protocol discrimination in trackerless 3d ultrasound reconstruction. In: International Workshop on Advances in Simplifying Medical Ultrasound. pp. 142–151. Springer (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Q., Shen, Z., et al.: Trackerless freehand ultrasound with sequence modelling and auxiliary transformation over past and future frames. In: International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. pp. 1–5. IEEE (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Q., Shen, Z., et al.: Long-term dependency for 3d reconstruction of freehand ultrasound without external tracker. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 71(3), 1033–1042 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, B., Feiyang, Y., Zhang, Y.: A closer look at loss weighting in multi-task learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindseth, F., Kaspersen, J.H., et al.: Multimodal image fusion in ultrasound-based neuronavigation: improving overview and interpretation by integrating preoperative mri with intraoperative 3d ultrasound. Computer Aided Surgery 8(2), 49–69 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, H., Simonyan, K., et al.: Darts: Differentiable architecture search. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luo, M., Yang, X., et al.: Self context and shape prior for sensorless freehand 3d ultrasound reconstruction. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. pp. 201–210. Springer (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, M., Yang, X., et al.: Deep motion network for freehand 3d ultrasound reconstruction. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 290–299. Springer (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luo, M., Yang, X., et al.: Multi-imu with online self-consistency for freehand 3d ultrasound reconstruction. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 342–351. Springer (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luo, M., Yang, X., et al.: Recon: Online learning for sensorless freehand 3d ultrasound reconstruction. Medical Image Analysis 87, 102810 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikaeili, M., Bilge, H.Ş.: Trajectory estimation of ultrasound images based on convolutional neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 78, 103965 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miura, K., Ito, K., et al.: Localizing 2d ultrasound probe from ultrasound image sequences using deep learning for volume reconstruction. In: International Workshop on Advances in Simplifying Medical Ultrasound. pp. 97–105. Springer (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Miura, K., Ito, K., et al.: Probe localization from ultrasound image sequences using deep learning for volume reconstruction. In: International Forum on Medical Imaging in Asia. vol. 11792, pp. 133–138. SPIE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ning, G., Liang, H., et al.: Spatial position estimation method for 3d ultrasound reconstruction based on hybrid transfomers. In: International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). pp. 1–5. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prevost, R., Salehi, M., et al.: 3d freehand ultrasound without external tracking using deep learning. Medical image analysis 48, 187–202 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan, M., Le, Q.: Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 6105–6114. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vercauteren, T., Perchant, A., et al.: Robust mosaicing with correction of motion distortions and tissue deformations for in vivo fibered microscopy. Medical image analysis 10(5), 673–692 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wein, W., Lupetti, M., et al.: Three-dimensional thyroid assessment from untracked 2d ultrasound clips. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 514–523. Springer (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xie, Y., Liao, H., et al.: Image-based 3d ultrasound reconstruction with optical flow via pyramid warping network. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). pp. 3539–3542. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xingfang, Y., Yumei, H., Feng, G.: A simple camera calibration method based on sub-pixel corner extraction of the chessboard image. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems. vol. 3, pp. 688–692. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EPSRC [EP/T029404/1], a Royal Academy of Engineering/Medtronic Research Chair [RCSRF1819\(\backslash \)7\(\backslash \)734] (TV), Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences [203145Z/16/Z], and the International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, an alliance between Cancer Research UK [C28070/A30912; C73666/A31378], Canary Center at Stanford University, the University of Cambridge, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, University College London and the University of Manchester. TV is co-founder and shareholder of Hypervision Surgical. Qi Li was supported by the University College London Overseas and Graduate Research Scholarships. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, Q. et al. (2024). Nonrigid Reconstruction of Freehand Ultrasound Without a Tracker. In: Linguraru, M.G., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2024. MICCAI 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15004. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72083-3_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72083-3_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-72082-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-72083-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics