Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

OpenPSS: An Open Page Stream Segmentation Benchmark

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2024)

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of companies and institutions have begun the process of digitizing their physical records to promote digital access and searchability of their collections. For cost-efficiency, documents are often scanned in consecutively, resulting in large PDF files consisting of many documents. Although cost-effective, this practice can be harmful for searchability when these concatenated documents are used to build a search engine. The task of Page Stream Segmentation is concerned with recovering the original document boundaries through the analysis of the text and/or images of these PDF files. Currently, many of the approaches to solving this problem make use of machine learning techniques that require significant amounts of training data. However, due to the sometimes sensitive nature of the data, few large datasets exist, and there is a lack of agreed-upon metrics to measure system performance.

In an effort to resolve these issues and provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the field, we constructed the OpenPSS benchmark, consisting of two large public datasets and a comprehensive study of various types of approaches, evaluated using multiple evaluation metrics. The datasets originated from several Dutch government institutions, cover a heterogeneous set of topics, and total roughly 141 thousand pages from around 32 thousand documents.

The experimental results show that ensemble methods using both the text and image representations of pages are superior to uni-modal methods, and that image-based neural methods are not as robust as text models when evaluated on out-of-distribution data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/wietsedv/bertje.

  3. 3.

    https://anonymous.4open.science/r/OpenPSSbenchmarkTPDL-D851/.

  4. 4.

    Kirilov et al. call the unweighted F1 the recognition quality RQ, and the weighted F1, which equals \(RQ\times SQ\) the Panoptic Quality PQ.

References

  1. Agam, G., Argamon, S., Frieder, O., Grossman, D., Lewis, D.: The Complex Document Image Processing (CDIP) Test Collection Project. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow, J., Jain, R., Morariu, V., Manjunatha, V., Oard, D., Resnik, P.: A joint model for document segmentation and segment labeling. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 313–322. Association for Computational Linguistics, New York, USA (2020). https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.29

  3. Beeferman, D., Berger, A., Lafferty, J.: Statistical models for text segmentation. Mach. Learn. 34(1), 177–210 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Braz, F.A., da Silva, N.C., Lima, J.A.S.: Leveraging effectiveness and efficiency in page stream deep segmentation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 105, 104394 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi, F.Y.Y.: Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2000). https://aclanthology.org/A00-2004

  6. Daher, H., Belaïd, A.: Document flow segmentation for business applications. In: Proceedings of the Document Recognition and Retrieval (DRR) XXI, vol. 9021, p. 90210G. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423

  8. Guha, A., Alahmadi, A., Samanta, D., Khan, M.Z., Alahmadi, A.H.: A multi-modal approach to digital document stream segmentation for title insurance domain. IEEE Access 10, 11341–11353 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamdi, A., Coustaty, M., Joseph, A., d’Andecy, V.P., Doucet, A., Ogier, J.M.: Feature selection for document flow segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 245–250 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hernault, H., Bollegala, D., Ishizuka, M.: A sequential model for discourse segmentation. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2010. LNCS, vol. 6008, pp. 315–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. van Heusden, R., Kamps, J., Marx, M.: WooIR: a new open page stream segmentation dataset. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, pp. 24–33 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

  13. Kirillov, A., He, K., Girshick, R., Rother, C., Dollár, P.: Panoptic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CCVPR), pp. 9404–9413 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koshorek, O., Cohen, A., Mor, N., Rotman, M., Berant, J.: Text segmentation as a supervised Learning task. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), pp. 469–473. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana (2018). https://aclanthology.org/N18-2075

  15. Kuncheva, L.I.: A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(2), 281–286 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1188–1196. PMLR (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis, D., Agam, G., Argamon, S., Frieder, O., Grossman, D., Heard, J.: Building a test collection for complex document information processing. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 665–666. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1148170.1148307

  18. Lukasik, M., Dadachev, B., Papineni, K., Simões, G.: Text segmentation by cross segment attention. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 4707–4716. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020). https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.380

  19. Meilender, T., Belaïd, A.: Segmentation of continuous document flow by a modified backward-forward algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Document Recognition and Retrieval (DRR) XVI, vol. 7247, p. 724705. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramachandram, D., Taylor, G.W.: Deep multimodal learning: a survey on recent advances and trends. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34(6), 96–108 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reynar, J.C.: An automatic method of finding topic boundaries. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 331–333. Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA (1994). https://aclanthology.org/P94-1050

  22. Sauvola, J., Pietikäinen, M.: Adaptive document image binarization. Pattern Recogn. 33(2), 225–236 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00055-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharkey, A.J.: Combining Artificial Neural Nets: Ensemble and Modular Multi-Net Systems, pp. 1–30. Springer (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0793-4

  24. Tan, M., Le, Q.: EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 6105–6114. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y., Li, S., Yang, J.: Toward fast and accurate neural discourse segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 962–967. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium (2018). https://aclanthology.org/D18-1116

  26. Wiedemann, G., Heyer, G.: Multi-modal page stream segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Lang. Resour. Eval. 55(1), 127–150 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, G., Doermann, D.: Automatic document logo detection. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 864–868. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, G., Zheng, Y., Doermann, D., Jaeger, S.: Multi-scale structural saliency for signature detection. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CCVPR), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben van Heusden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Heusden, R.v., Kamps, J., Marx, M. (2024). OpenPSS: An Open Page Stream Segmentation Benchmark. In: Antonacopoulos, A., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15177. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-72436-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-72437-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics