Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

‘Here Be Dragons’: Approaching Difficult Group Issues in Networked Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Design, Experience and Practice of Networked Learning

Part of the book series: Research in Networked Learning ((RINL))

Abstract

Participative designs for learning are commonly advocated in networked learning whether generally as ‘collaborative’ approaches to learning or more specifically in the form of models such as the ‘learning community’. Such designs are likely to involve students and teachers in any of the complexities associated with collective endeavour: whether interpersonal, social, cultural or political. In non-virtual education, there is a long tradition of theoretical frameworks but there appears to have been less work of this kind specifically in relation to group work within VLEs. It is as if the tradition of participative pedagogy has found a home within the domain of networked learning but ideas that could be necessary in understanding the dynamics generated within such pedagogies have been left behind. In this chapter we move away from an exclusively virtual framework through which to examine social dynamics in order to mine a richer seam of material for making sense of group dynamics. We use a variation on Potter’s (1979) idea of the ‘dilemmas’ likely to be experienced by members of learning groups, to construct a framework through which diverse interpretations can be accommodated in making sense of online dynamics.

The phrase ‘Here be dragons’ is associated with warnings written, or mythical creatures presented in pictorial form, on mediaeval maps where the cartographer wanted to denote unexplored or dangerous territories. Group dynamics are often experienced as unexplored or dangerous territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors are grateful for the generosity of the colleagues who agreed to take part in this project as ‘virtual tutors’ and responded with such aplomb. Our special thanks go to Sian Baynes, Tara Fenwick, Vivien Hodgson, David McConnell and Russ Vince, for their thoughtful comments and insights. In order to make the virtual tutor discussion sound as if it is a conversation in real time, we have conflated some individual responses and given them to a single tutor to voice. As a result we took the decision not to attribute the comments of our tutors to named individuals; any inadvertent misrepresentations of the responses given to us are the responsibility of the authors and, we hope, are forgiven.

  2. 2.

    Fenwick (2013) noticed, with some surprise, the appearance of ‘a rather alarming pedagogical self that strode forth to define and prescribe’ when she first read the fictionalised student discussion. The ‘pedagogical self’ struck a chord with us and we have retained the label.

  3. 3.

    There might well be other questions that would be as useful to ask. The questions we have provided are those that seemed common sense ones to us in looking at the dilemma. The utility of this approach is in keeping the questions tied to the dilemma, rather than generating them from a particular interpretive framework. The answers to those questions, as offered by different members of the tutor team (or students) will, of course, be informed by a particular theory in use.

References

  • Allan, B. (2007). Time to learn? E-learners experiences of time in virtual learning communities. Management Learning, 38(5), 557–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, B., & Vince, R. (2006, March 20–22). Emotions shared/emotions hidden: Reflections on emotional dynamics in virtual learning communities. Paper presented at the Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities Conference at the University of Warwick, Coventry, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces. E-Learning, 1(2), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D. L. (2002). Engagement, excitement, anxiety, and fear: Learners’ experiences of starting an online course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossouard, B., Pryor, J., & Torrance, H. (2004, September). Creating an alternative assessment regime with online formative assessment: Developing a researcher identity. Paper presented to the European Conference on Education Research, Crete, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, England: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2012). Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2013). Here be dragons response [email] (Personal communication, January 15 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. ETR&D, 49(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V., & Reynolds, M. (2005). Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: Communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 12(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. R., Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). Networked learning a relational approach: Weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd ed.). London, England: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D., Hodgson, V., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). Networked learning: A brief history and new trends. In L. Dirckinck Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6(1), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, S. G. (1979, September). Three dilemmas. Paper presented to Group Relations Training Association Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, England: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. O. (2005). Working with difference in online collaborative groups. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(3), 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staggers, J., Garcia, S., & Nagelhout, E. (2008). Teamwork through team building: Face-to-face to online. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(4), 472–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Perriton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perriton, L., Reynolds, M. (2014). ‘Here Be Dragons’: Approaching Difficult Group Issues in Networked Learning. In: Hodgson, V., de Laat, M., McConnell, D., Ryberg, T. (eds) The Design, Experience and Practice of Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01940-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics