Abstract
One central goal of design science research (DSR) is to generate, extract and communicate knowledge about the design of an artifact. Design science researchers ultimately strive to contribute knowledge in the form of mature design theories; mere descriptions of the artifacts are not regarded as sufficient contributions to knowledge anymore in scholarly publications. There is an increasing body of guidelines on how to produce and publish mature design theories. However, not every research project is in that state. To publish intermediate results (i.e. nascent theories), only general, abstract publication schemes can be found in the recent literature making it difficult to publish design knowledge at that intermediate level. In this paper, we contribute an extension of an existing publication scheme, tailored towards the publication of such intermediate, work in progress design knowledge in the form of prescriptive design principles. This scheme was designed with respect to the complexity of today’s information systems IT artifacts. To demonstrate the scheme’s applicability, we will apply it to one of our recent scholarly publications in the CSCW area. We argue that this publication scheme extension will help to communicate design knowledge in earlier project stages, which allows a faster feedback to the knowledge base that will enable a broader community to participate in the “search process” for an optimal design solution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 470–475 (2008)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Sys-tems Research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)
Hevner, A.R.: The three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87 (2007)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)
Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A.: Knowing What a User Likes: A Design Science Ap-proach to Interfaces that Automatically Adapt to Culture. MIS Q. 37, 427–453 (2013)
Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Introduction to Design Science Research. Design Research in Information Systems, pp. 1–8. Springer US (2010)
Baskerville, R.: What design science is not. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 441–443 (2008)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 37, 337–355 (2013)
Jones, D., Gregor, S.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 1 (2007)
Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Q. 30, 611–642 (2006)
Novak, J., Schwabe, G.: Designing for reintermediation in the brick-and-mortar world: Towards the travel agency of the future. Electron. Mark. 19, 15–29 (2009)
Schmidt-Rauch, S., Schwabe, G.: From telesales to tele-advisory in travel agen-cies: Business problems, generic design goals and requirements. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. TMIS. 2, 17 (2011)
Nussbaumer, P., Matter, I., Schwabe, G.: “Enforced” vs. “Casual”. Transparency – Findings from IT-Supported Financial Advisory Encounters. ACM Trans Manage Inf Syst. 3, 11:1–11:19 (2012)
Nussbaumer, M.P., Matter, D.I.I., à Porta, G.R., Schwabe, G.: Designing for Cost Transparency in Investment Advisory Service Encounters. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4, 347–361 (2012)
Heinrich, P., Kilic, M., Aschoff, F.-R., Schwabe, G.: Enabling Relationship Building in Tabletop-supported Advisory Settings. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 171–183. ACM, New York (2014)
Walls, J., Widmeyer, G.: ElSawy: Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36–59 (1992)
Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13 (2012)
Goldkuhl, G.: Design Theories in Information Systems - A Need for Multi-Grounding. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. JITTA 6 (2004)
Gregor, S., Müller, O., Seidel, S.: Reflection, Abstraction And Theorizin. In: De-sign and Development Research. In: ECIS 2013 Complet. Res. (2013)
Van den Akker, J.: Principles and methods of development research. Design approaches and tools in education and training, pp. 1–14. Springer (1999)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for Design Science Re-search Evaluation. In: ECIS 2008 Proc. (2008)
Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Chen, M.: Systems development in information systems research. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 631–640. IEEE (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Heinrich, P., Schwabe, G. (2014). Communicating Nascent Design Theories on Innovative Information Systems through Multi-grounded Design Principles. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds) Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice. DESRIST 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06700-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06701-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)