Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Abstract

Museums have large databases of images. The librarians that are using these databases are doing two types of images search: either they know what they are looking for in the database (a specific image or a specific set of well defined images such as kings of France), or they do not know precisely what they are looking for (e.g., when they are required to build images portfolios about some concepts such as “decency”). As each image is having a number of metadata, searching for a well-defined image, or for set of images, is easily solved. On the contrary, this is a hard problem when the task is to illustrate a given concept such as “freedom”, “decency”, “bread”, or “transparency” since these concepts are not metadata. How to find images that are somewhat analogs because they illustrate a given concept?

We collected and analyzed the search results of librarians that were given themselves the task of finding images related to a given concept. Seven relations between the concept and the images were found as explanation of the selection of images for any concept: conceptual property, causality, effectivity semantic, anti-logic, metaphorical-vehicle and metaphorical-topic. The inter-rate agreement of independent judges that evaluated the relations was of .78.

Finally, we designed an experiment to evaluate how much metaphor in images can be understandable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tijus, C., Cambon de Lavalette, B., Poitrenaud, S., Leproux, C.: L’interaction autorégulatrice entre dispositif et utilisateur: une modélisation des inférences sur les durées du parcours routier. Le Travail Humain 66(1), 23–44 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tijus, C., Barcenilla, J., Jouen, F., Rougeaux, M.: Open innovation and prospective ergonomics for smart clothes. In: 2nd International Conference on Ergonomics in Design (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barcenilla, J., Tijus, C.: Ethical issues raised by the new orientations in ergonomics and living labs. Work 41, 5259–5265 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tijus, C., Poitrenaud, S., Léger, L., Brézillon, P.: Counterfactual Based Innovation: A Galois Lattice Approach of Creative Thinking. In: International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, RIVF 2009, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roth-Berghofer, T.R.: Explanations and Case-Based Reasoning. Foundational Issues. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 389–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gombrich, E.H.: Mediations on a hobby horse. In: Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gentner, D., Toupin, C.: Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science 10(3), 277–300 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ripoll, T., Eynard, J.: A Critical Analysis of Current Models of Analogy. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Information Processing And Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, IPMU 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon, H., Im, I., Van de Walle, B.: Are you thinking what I am thinking – A comparison of decision makers’ cognitive map by means of a new similarity measure. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 78, p (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 5, 327–358 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Candau, C., Ventalon, G., Barcenilla, J., Tijus, C. (2014). Analogy and Metaphors in Images. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 443. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08854-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08855-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics