Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8561))

Abstract

Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas (DQBF) extend QBF with Henkin quantifiers, which allow for non-linear dependencies between the quantified variables. This extension is useful in verification problems for incomplete designs, such as the partial equivalence checking (PEC) problem, where a partial circuit, with some parts left open as “black boxes”, is compared against a full circuit. The PEC problem is to decide whether the black boxes in the partial circuit can be filled in such a way that the two circuits become equivalent, while respecting that each black box only observes the subset of the signals that are designated as its input. We present a new algorithm that efficiently refutes unsatisfiable DQBF formulas. The algorithm detects situations in which already a subset of the possible assignments of the universally quantified variables suffices to rule out a satisfying assignment of the existentially quantified variables. Our experimental evaluation on PEC benchmarks shows that the new algorithm is a significant improvement both over approximative QBF-based methods, where our results are much more accurate, and over precise methods based on variable elimination, where the new algorithm scales better in the number of Henkin quantifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balabanov, V., Chiang, H.-J.K., Jiang, J.-H.R.: Henkin quantifiers and Boolean formulae. In: Cimatti, A., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) SAT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7317, pp. 129–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Balabanov, V., Jiang, J.H.R.: Unified QBF certification and its applications. Formal Methods in System Design 41(1), 45–65 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benedetti, M.: Evaluating QBFs via symbolic skolemization. In: Baader, F., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3452, pp. 285–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Biere, A., Lonsing, F., Seidl, M.: Blocked clause elimination for QBF. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6803, pp. 101–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bubeck, U., Kleine Büning, H.: Dependency quantified horn formulas: Models and complexity. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 198–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Finkbeiner, B., Schewe, S.: Uniform distributed synthesis. In: LICS, pp. 321–330. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finkbeiner, B., Tentrup, L.: Detecting unrealizable specifications of distributed systems. In: Ábrahám, E., Havelund, K. (eds.) TACAS 2014. LNCS. vol. 8413, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finkbeiner, B., Tentrup, L.: Fast DQBF refutation. Reports of SFB/TR 14 AVACS 97, SFB/TR 14 AVACS (2014), http://www.avacs.org , ISSN: 1860-9821

  9. Fröhlich, A., Kovásznai, G., Biere, A.: A DPLL algorithm for solving DQBF. In: Proc. POS 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gitina, K., Reimer, S., Sauer, M., Wimmer, R., Scholl, C., Becker, B.: Equivalence checking of partial designs using dependency quantified Boolean formulae. In: ICCD, pp. 396–403. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Janota, M., Marques-Silva, J.: On propositional QBF expansions and Q-resolution. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds.) SAT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7962, pp. 67–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y.: Synthesis with incomplete information. In: ICTL (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lonsing, F., Biere, A.: DepQBF: A dependency-aware QBF solver. JSAT 7(2-3), 71–76 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nopper, T., Scholl, C., Becker, B.: Computation of minimal counterexamples by using black box techniques and symbolic methods. In: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, ICCAD 2007, pp. 273–280 (November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson, G.L., Reif, J.: Multiple-person alternation. In: 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 1979, pp. 348–363 (October 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scholl, C., Becker, B.: Checking equivalence for partial implementations. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Design Automation Conference, DAC 2011, pp. 238–243. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. William, J., Dally, R.C.H.: Digital Design, A Systems Approach. Cambridge University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Finkbeiner, B., Tentrup, L. (2014). Fast DQBF Refutation. In: Sinz, C., Egly, U. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2014. SAT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8561. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09283-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09284-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics