Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Asset Management Decisions—Based on System Thinking and Data Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Asset Management - Systems, Professional Practices and Certification

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Asset related data is collected in several information systems (e.g. enterprise resource management (ERP) and computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) systems) at industrial plants. Information systems including asset related data are typically used for operational level decisions (e.g. creating maintenance work orders) but maintenance history data is also valuable when making asset management level decisions (e.g. investment decisions). Even though there is a huge amount of stored data, tacit knowledge is needed for risk conscious asset decisions both for supplementing the data contained in IT-systems and for creating the understanding of the production system itself and its interrelationships. The paper describes how data collected from ERP and CMMS system can be utilized when improving operational efficiency and researching investment opportunities and evaluating investment options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EFNMS (2012) How organisations manage their physical assets in practice. EFNMS asset management survey 2011. European Asset Management Committee within EFNMS. European Federation of National Maintenance Societies vzw

    Google Scholar 

  2. Silvola R, Jaaskelainen O, Kropsu-Vehkapera H, Haapasalo H (2011) Managing one master data—challenges and preconditions. Comm Assoc Inf Syst 4(23):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kunttu S, Kiiveri J (2012) Take the Advantage of dependability data. Maintworld 4(3):24–26

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haug A, Arlbjørn J, Zachriassen F, Schlichter J (2013) Master data quality barriers: an empirical investigation. Ind Manag Data Syst 113(2):234–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tranfield D, Denyer D, Burr M (2004) A framework for the strategic management of long term assets (SMoLTA). Manag Decis 42(2):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kortelainen H, Räikkönen M, Komonen K (2013) Corporate asset management—a semi-quantitative business—driven approach for evaluating improvement options. MPMM 2013 maintenance performance measurement and management conference. Sept. 12–13 2013. Lappeenranta, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  8. McNeeney A (2005) Improve asset performance management. Hydrocarbon processing 84(12):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosqvist T, Laakso K, Reunanen M (2009) Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94(1):97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parida A (2012) Asset performance assessment. In: Van der Lei T, Herder P, Wijnia Y (eds) Asset management, 101–113. Springer Science, Business Media B.V

    Google Scholar 

  11. Komonen K, Kortelainen H, Räikkönen M (2012) Corporate asset management for industrial companies: an integrated business-driven approach. In: Van der Lei T, Herder P, Wijnia Y (eds) Asset management, 67–86. Springer Science, Business Media B.V

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melvin G (2012) Top 5 questions you should ask about your assets and how pas55 can help you answer them. MaintWord 4:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kortelainen H, Pursio S (2001) Availablity performance stands for plant efficiency. Paperi ja Puu Paper and Timber 84(2):292–296

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahonen T, Reunanen M, Heikkilä J (2006) Updating a maintenance programme based on various information sources. In: Konbin 4th International conference on safety and reliability. Cracow, Poland. May 30 – Jun 2. Air Force Institute of Technology. Poland, Warsaw. 6 p

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valkokari P, Kunttu S, Ahonen T (2011) Maintenance data in productive maintenance. Promaint 25(2):24–27 In Finnish

    Google Scholar 

  16. IEC 60300-3-11. Dependability management—Part 3–11: Application guide. Reliability centered maintenance. In: International electrochemical commission IEC. 90 p

    Google Scholar 

  17. IEC 60300-3-9. Dependability management—Part 3: Application guide. Section 9: Risk analysis of technological systems. In: International electrochemical commission IEC. 47 p

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kunttu S, Kortelainen H (2004) Supporting maintenance decisions with event and expert data. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium 2004. Los Angeles, CA, 26–29 Jan. 2004. IEEE, pp 593–599

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heikkilä A, Komonen K, Räikkönen M, Kunttu S (2012) Empirical experiences of investment portfolio management in a capital-intensive business environment. Int J Strat Eng Asset Manag 1(2):117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Better M, Glover F (2006) Selecting project portfolios by optimizing simulations. Eng Econ 51(2):81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holmberg K, Adgar A, Aitor A, Jantunen E, Mascolo J, Mekid S (eds) (2010) E-Maintenance. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mikkonen H, Markkanen J (2013) Improved production and maintenance efficiency by operator driven reliability (ODR). COMADEM 2013. In: International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Maintenance. 11–13 June. Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  23. EFNMS (2009) A definition of Asset Management. Minutes of the meeting. European federation of national maintenance societies, Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Kortelainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kortelainen, H., Kunttu, S., Valkokari, P., Ahonen, T. (2015). Asset Management Decisions—Based on System Thinking and Data Analysis. In: Tse, P., Mathew, J., Wong, K., Lam, R., Ko, C. (eds) Engineering Asset Management - Systems, Professional Practices and Certification. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09507-3_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09507-3_92

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09506-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09507-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics