Abstract
Asset related data is collected in several information systems (e.g. enterprise resource management (ERP) and computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) systems) at industrial plants. Information systems including asset related data are typically used for operational level decisions (e.g. creating maintenance work orders) but maintenance history data is also valuable when making asset management level decisions (e.g. investment decisions). Even though there is a huge amount of stored data, tacit knowledge is needed for risk conscious asset decisions both for supplementing the data contained in IT-systems and for creating the understanding of the production system itself and its interrelationships. The paper describes how data collected from ERP and CMMS system can be utilized when improving operational efficiency and researching investment opportunities and evaluating investment options.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
EFNMS (2012) How organisations manage their physical assets in practice. EFNMS asset management survey 2011. European Asset Management Committee within EFNMS. European Federation of National Maintenance Societies vzw
Silvola R, Jaaskelainen O, Kropsu-Vehkapera H, Haapasalo H (2011) Managing one master data—challenges and preconditions. Comm Assoc Inf Syst 4(23):63–72
Kunttu S, Kiiveri J (2012) Take the Advantage of dependability data. Maintworld 4(3):24–26
Haug A, Arlbjørn J, Zachriassen F, Schlichter J (2013) Master data quality barriers: an empirical investigation. Ind Manag Data Syst 113(2):234–248
Tranfield D, Denyer D, Burr M (2004) A framework for the strategic management of long term assets (SMoLTA). Manag Decis 42(2):277–291
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533
Kortelainen H, Räikkönen M, Komonen K (2013) Corporate asset management—a semi-quantitative business—driven approach for evaluating improvement options. MPMM 2013 maintenance performance measurement and management conference. Sept. 12–13 2013. Lappeenranta, Finland
McNeeney A (2005) Improve asset performance management. Hydrocarbon processing 84(12):61–67
Rosqvist T, Laakso K, Reunanen M (2009) Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94(1):97–110
Parida A (2012) Asset performance assessment. In: Van der Lei T, Herder P, Wijnia Y (eds) Asset management, 101–113. Springer Science, Business Media B.V
Komonen K, Kortelainen H, Räikkönen M (2012) Corporate asset management for industrial companies: an integrated business-driven approach. In: Van der Lei T, Herder P, Wijnia Y (eds) Asset management, 67–86. Springer Science, Business Media B.V
Melvin G (2012) Top 5 questions you should ask about your assets and how pas55 can help you answer them. MaintWord 4:24–27
Kortelainen H, Pursio S (2001) Availablity performance stands for plant efficiency. Paperi ja Puu Paper and Timber 84(2):292–296
Ahonen T, Reunanen M, Heikkilä J (2006) Updating a maintenance programme based on various information sources. In: Konbin 4th International conference on safety and reliability. Cracow, Poland. May 30 – Jun 2. Air Force Institute of Technology. Poland, Warsaw. 6 p
Valkokari P, Kunttu S, Ahonen T (2011) Maintenance data in productive maintenance. Promaint 25(2):24–27 In Finnish
IEC 60300-3-11. Dependability management—Part 3–11: Application guide. Reliability centered maintenance. In: International electrochemical commission IEC. 90 p
IEC 60300-3-9. Dependability management—Part 3: Application guide. Section 9: Risk analysis of technological systems. In: International electrochemical commission IEC. 47 p
Kunttu S, Kortelainen H (2004) Supporting maintenance decisions with event and expert data. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium 2004. Los Angeles, CA, 26–29 Jan. 2004. IEEE, pp 593–599
Heikkilä A, Komonen K, Räikkönen M, Kunttu S (2012) Empirical experiences of investment portfolio management in a capital-intensive business environment. Int J Strat Eng Asset Manag 1(2):117–134
Better M, Glover F (2006) Selecting project portfolios by optimizing simulations. Eng Econ 51(2):81–97
Holmberg K, Adgar A, Aitor A, Jantunen E, Mascolo J, Mekid S (eds) (2010) E-Maintenance. Springer, London
Mikkonen H, Markkanen J (2013) Improved production and maintenance efficiency by operator driven reliability (ODR). COMADEM 2013. In: International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Maintenance. 11–13 June. Helsinki, Finland
EFNMS (2009) A definition of Asset Management. Minutes of the meeting. European federation of national maintenance societies, Trondheim, Norway
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kortelainen, H., Kunttu, S., Valkokari, P., Ahonen, T. (2015). Asset Management Decisions—Based on System Thinking and Data Analysis. In: Tse, P., Mathew, J., Wong, K., Lam, R., Ko, C. (eds) Engineering Asset Management - Systems, Professional Practices and Certification. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09507-3_92
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09507-3_92
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09506-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09507-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)