Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Statistical Relational Learning with Soft Quantifiers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2015)

Abstract

Quantification in statistical relational learning (SRL) is either existential or universal, however humans might be more inclined to express knowledge using soft quantifiers, such as “most” and “a few”. In this paper, we define the syntax and semantics of PSL\(^Q\), a new SRL framework that supports reasoning with soft quantifiers, and present its most probable explanation (MPE) inference algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, PSL\(^Q\) is the first SRL framework that combines soft quantifiers with first-order logic rules for modeling uncertain relational data. Our experimental results for link prediction in social trust networks demonstrate that the use of soft quantifiers not only allows for a natural and intuitive formulation of domain knowledge, but also improves the accuracy of inferred results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source code available at http://psl.umiacs.umd.edu.

  2. 2.

    www.epinions.com.

References

  1. Bach, S.H., Broecheler, M., Huang, B., Getoor, L.: Hinge-loss markov random fields and probabilistic soft logic. [cs.LG] (2015). arXiv:1505.04406

  2. Bach, S.H., Huang, B., London, B., Getoor, L.: Hinge-loss Markov random fields: convex inference for structured prediction. In: Proceedings of the Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beltagy, I., Erk, K.: On the proper treatment of quantifiers in probabilistic logic semantics. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS), p. 140 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beltagy, I., Erk, K., Mooney, R.J.: Probabilistic soft logic for semantic textual similarity. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 1210–1219 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: fuzzyDL: an expressive fuzzy description logic reasoner. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp. 923–930 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cao, T.H., Rossiter, J.M., Martin, T.P., Baldwin, J.F.: On the implementation of fril++ for object-oriented logic programming with uncertainty and fuzziness. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Gutiérrez-Ríos, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems 2. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 90, pp. 393–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, M.: Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Empirical methods in Natural Language Processing (ACL), pp. 1–8 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delgado, M., Sánchez, D., Vila, M.A.: Fuzzy cardinality based evaluation of quantified sentences. Int. J. Approximate Reason. 1, 23–66 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fakhraei, S., Huang, B., Raschid, L., Getoor, L.: Network-based drug-target interaction prediction with probabilistic soft logic. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 11(5), 775–787 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farnadi, G., Bach, S.H., Moens, M.F., Getoor, L., De Cock, M.: Extending psl with fuzzy quantifiers. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Statistical Relational, AI at AAAI (StarAI) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Getoor, L., Taskar, B.: Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT press, Cambridge (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Heider, F.: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York (1958)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, B., Kimmig, A., Getoor, L., Golbeck, J.: A flexible framework for probabilistic models of social trust. In: Greenberg, A.M., Kennedy, W.G., Bos, N.D. (eds.) SBP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7812, pp. 265–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Isbell, J.R., Marlow, W.H.: Attrition games. Naval Res. Logistics Q. 3(1–2), 71–94 (1956)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain, D., Barthels, A., Beetz, M.: Adaptive Markov logic networks: learning statistical relational models with dynamic parameters. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 937–942 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kazemi, S.M., Buchman, D., Kersting, K., Natarajan, S., Poole, D.: Relational logistic regression. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klir, G., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Signed networks in social media. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lowd, D., Domingos, P.: Recursive random fields. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 950–955 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milch, B., Zettlemoyer, L.S., Kersting, K., Haimes, M., Kaelbling, L.P.: Lifted probabilistic inference with counting formulas. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAi) 8, 1062–1068 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muggleton, S., De Raedt, L.: Inductive Logic Programming: Theory and Methods. J. Logic Program. 19(20), 629–679 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Poole, D., Buchman, D., Kazemi, S.M., Kersting, K., Natarajan, S.: Population size extrapolation in relational probabilistic modelling. In: Straccia, U., Calì, A. (eds.) SUM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8720, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poole, D., Buchman, D., Natarajan, S., Kersting, K.: Aggregation and population growth: the relational logistic regression and Markov logic cases. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Statistical Relational AI at UAI (StarAI) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prade, H., Richard, G., Serrurier, M.: Learning first order fuzzy logic rules. In: De Baets, B., Kaynak, O., Bilgiç, T. (eds.) IFSA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2715. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pujara, J., Miao, H., Getoor, L., Cohen, W.: Knowledge graph identification. In: Alani, H., Kagal, L., Fokoue, A., Groth, P., Biemann, C., Parreira, J.X., Aroyo, L., Noy, N., Welty, C., Janowicz, K. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 542–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Markov logic networks. Mach. Learn. 62(1–2), 107–136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van den Broeck, G., Meert, W., Darwiche, A.: Skolemization for weighted first-order model counting (2013). arXiv:1312.5378

  28. Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M.: Trust and recommendations. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 645–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. West, R., Paskov, H.S., Leskovec, J., Potts, C.: Exploiting social network structure for person-to-person sentiment analysis. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (TACL) 2, 297–310 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. (IEEE SMC) 1, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Zadeh, L.A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput. Math. Appl. 1, 149–184 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This work was funded in part by the SBO-program of the Flemish Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT-SBO-Nr. 110067) and NSF grant IIS1218488. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Golnoosh Farnadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Farnadi, G., Bach, S.H., Blondeel, M., Moens, MF., Getoor, L., De Cock, M. (2016). Statistical Relational Learning with Soft Quantifiers. In: Inoue, K., Ohwada, H., Yamamoto, A. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9575. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40566-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40566-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40565-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40566-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics