Abstract
Workflow management is fundamental to efficiently, effectively and economically carry out complex processes. In turn, the formalism used for representing workflow models is crucial for effectiveness. The formalism introduced by the WoMan framework for workflow management, based on First-Order Logic, is more expressive than standard formalisms adopted in the literature, and ensures strict adherence to the observed practices. This paper discusses in some details such a formalism, highlighting its most outstanding strengths and comparing it to the current standard formalism (Petri nets), also providing techniques for the translation of workflow models among the two formalisms. The comparison between the two models shows that WoMan is more powerful than standard Petri Nets, and that it can handle naturally and straightforwardly cases that would require complex patterns in Petri Nets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Note that this is a different meaning than in Petri Nets. In the following, we will distinguish the latter by writing Petri Net transitions.
References
Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining process models from workflow logs. In: Schek, H.-J., Saltor, F., Ramos, I., Alonso, G. (eds.) EDBT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1377, pp. 467–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. Technical Report CU-CS-819-96, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado (1996)
Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Event-based detection of concurrency. Technical report CU-CS-860-98, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado (1998)
de Medeiros, A.K.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.J.M.M.T.: Workflow mining: current status and future directions. In: Meersman, R., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) CoopIS 2003, DOA 2003, and ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 389–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
de Medeiros, A.K.A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.: Process mining: extending the \(\alpha \)-algorithm to mine short loops. In: WP 113, BETA Working Paper Series. Eindhoven University of Technology (2004)
de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 14, 245–304 (2007)
Ferilli, S.: WoMan: logic-based workflow learning and management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 44, 744–756 (2014)
Ferilli, S., Esposito, F.: A logic framework for incremental learning of process models. Fundamenta Informaticae 128(4), 413–443 (2013). IOS Press
Herbst, J.: Dealing with concurrency in workflow induction. In: Proceedings of European Concurrent Engineering Conference, pp. 175–182. SCS Europe (2000)
Herbst, J., Karagiannis, D.: Integrating machine learning and workflow management to support acquisition and adaptation of workflow models. In: Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 745–752. IEEE (1998)
Herbst, J., Karagiannis, D.: An inductive approach to the acquisition and adaptation of workflow models. In Proceedings of IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Intelligent Workflow and Process Management: The New Frontier for AI in Business, pp. 52–57 (1999)
Herbst, J.: A machine learning approach to workflow management. In: Lopez de Mantaras, R., Plaza, E. (eds.) ECML 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1810, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
van der Aalst, W., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Maggi, F.M., Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Efficient discovery of understandable declarative process models from event logs. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 270–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining in business processes. In: WP 164, BETA Working Paper Series. Eindhoven University of Technology (2006)
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of petri nets to workflow management. J. Circ. Syst. Comput. 8, 21–66 (1998)
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process mining: overview and opportunities. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 3, 7.1–7.17 (2012)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dustdar, S.: Process mining put into context. IEEE Internet Comput. 16, 82–86 (2012)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, T., Maruster, L.: Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 1128–1142 (2004)
Weijters, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data. In: Proceedings of 11th Dutch-Belgian Conference of Machine Learning (Benelearn 2001), pp. 93–100 (2001)
Wen, L., Wang, J., Sun, J.: Detecting implicit dependencies between tasks from event logs. In: Zhou, X., Li, J., Shen, H.T., Kitsuregawa, M., Zhang, Y. (eds.) APWeb 2006. LNCS, vol. 3841, pp. 591–603. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Acknowledgments
This work was partially funded by the Italian PON 2007–2013 project PON02_00563_3489339 ‘Puglia@Service’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ferilli, S. (2016). The WoMan Formalism for Expressing Process Models. In: Perner, P. (eds) Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects. ICDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41561-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41561-1_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41560-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41561-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)