Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Probabilistic Model of Neuronal Background Activity in Deep Brain Stimulation Trajectories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology in Bio- and Medical Informatics (ITBAM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9832))

Abstract

We present a probabilistic model for classification of micro-EEG signals, recorded during deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease. The model uses parametric representation of neuronal background activity, estimated using normalized root-mean-square of the signal. Contrary to existing solutions using Bayes classifiers or Hidden Markov Models, our model uses smooth state-transitions represented by sigmoid functions, which ensures flexible model structure in combination with general optimizers for parameter estimation and model fitting. The presented model can easily be extended with additional parameters and constraints and is intended for fitting of a 3D anatomical model to micro-EEG data in further perspective. In an evaluation on 260 trajectories from 61 patients, the model showed classification accuracy 90.0 %, which was comparable to existing solutions. The evaluation proved the model successful in target identification and we conclude that its use for more complex tasks in the area of DBS planning and modeling is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The dataset in [7] consisted of 52 signals from four patients only and it is not clear whether the validation sample was completely independent in terms of similarity of neighbor segments — see e.g. [8] for description of a similar problem.

  2. 2.

    Smooth state transitions using logistic sigmoid functions lead to smooth gradient and the resulting model is therefore easier to optimize.

  3. 3.

    Value of this normalization coefficient will however be close to one in most circumstances and reaches around 1.2 in the extreme case when \(a=b\) using sigmoid parameters from Fig. 1.

  4. 4.

    In the case with no entry/exit depth distribution, the initial parameters were set as the middle of the trajectory for a and the 3 / 4 of the trajectory for b.

  5. 5.

    Dimension of the parametric space searched during the evaluation phase is two, due to two optimized parameters: STN entry a and exit b, both in the range of recorded depths. The search space is further reduced by the conditions defined at the end of Model Evaluation section, especially \(a\le b\).

References

  1. Abosch, A., Timmermann, L., Bartley, S., Rietkerk, H.G., Whiting, D., Connolly, P.J., Lanctin, D., Hariz, M.I.: An international survey of deep brain stimulation procedural steps. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 91(1), 1–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aboy, M., Falkenberg, J.H.: An automatic algorithm for stationary segmentation of extracellular microelectrode recordings. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 44(6), 511–515 (2006). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16937202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakstein, E., Schneider, J., Sieger, T., Novak, D., Wild, J., Jech, R.: Supervised segmentation of microelectrode recording artifacts using power spectral density. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), vol. 2015-Novem, pp. 1524–1527. IEEE, August 2015. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=7318661

  4. Benabid, A.L., Pollak, P., Gao, D., Hoffmann, D., Limousin, P., Gay, E., Payen, I., Benazzouz, A.: Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralisintermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J. Neurosurg. 84(2), 203–214 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cagnan, H., Dolan, K., He, X., Contarino, M.F., Schuurman, R., van den Munckhof, P., Wadman, W.J., Bour, L., Martens, H.C.F.: Automatic subthalamic nucleus detection from microelectrode recordings based on noise level and neuronal activity. J. Neural. Eng. 8(4), 46006 (2011). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21628771, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gross, R.E., Krack, P., Rodriguez-Oroz, M.C., Rezai, A.R., Benabid, A.L.: Electrophysiological mapping for the implantation of deep brain stimulators for Parkinson’s disease and tremor. Mov. Disord. 21(Suppl. 1), S259–S283 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.20960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillen, P., Martinez-de Pison, F., Sanchez, R., Argaez, M., Velazquez, L.: Characterization of subcortical structures during deep brain stimulation utilizing support vector machines. In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 6, pp. 7949–7952. IEEE, August 2011. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs all.jsp?arnumber=6091960, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6091960

  8. Hammerla, N.Y., Plötz, T.: Let’s (not) stick together: pairwise similarity biases cross-validation in activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 1041–1051 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moran, A., Bar-Gad, I., Bergman, H., Israel, Z.: Real-time refinement of subthalamic nucleus targeting using Bayesian decision-making on the root meansquare measure. Mov. Disord. 21(9), 1425–1431 (2006). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16763982, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.20995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Novak, P., Daniluk, S., Ellias, S.A., Nazzaro, J.M.: Detection of the subthalamic nucleus in microelectrographic recordings in Parkinson disease using the high-frequency (\(> 500\) hz) neuronal background. J. Neurosurg. 106(1), 175–179 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.2007.106.1.175

    Google Scholar 

  11. Novak, P., Przybyszewski, A.W., Barborica, A., Ravin, P., Margolin, L., Pilitsis, J.G.: Localization of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson disease using multiunit activity. J. Neurol. Sci. 310(1–2), 44–49 (2011). http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022510X11004448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shamir, R.R., Zaidel, A., Joskowicz, L., Bergman, H., Israel, Z.: Microelectrode recording duration and spatial density constraints for automatic targeting of the subthalamic nucleus. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 90(5), 325–334 (2012). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22854414, http://www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000338252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taghva, A.: Hidden Semi-Markov Models in the computerized decoding of microelectrode recording data for deep brain stimulator placement. World Neurosurg. 75(5-6), 758–763.e4 (2011). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21704949, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187887501000848X

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zaidel, A., Spivak, A., Shpigelman, L., Bergman, H., Israel, Z.: Delimiting subterritories of the human subthalamic nucleus by means of microelectrode recordings and a Hidden Markov Model. Mov. Disord. 24(12), 1785–1793 (2009). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19533755, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.22674

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work presented in this paper has been supported by the students’ grant agency of the CTU, no. SGS16/231/OHK3/3T/13, and by the Grant Agency of the Czech republic, grant no. 16-13323S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduard Bakstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bakstein, E., Sieger, T., Novak, D., Jech, R. (2016). Probabilistic Model of Neuronal Background Activity in Deep Brain Stimulation Trajectories. In: Renda, M., Bursa, M., Holzinger, A., Khuri, S. (eds) Information Technology in Bio- and Medical Informatics. ITBAM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43949-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43949-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43948-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43949-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics