Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Adaptive Testing Using a General Diagnostic Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive and Adaptable Learning (EC-TEL 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9891))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In online learning platforms such as MOOCs, computerized assessment needs to be optimized in order to prevent boredom and dropout of learners. Indeed, they should spend as little time as possible in tests and still receive valuable feedback. It is actually possible to reduce the number of questions for the same accuracy with computerized adaptive testing (CAT): asking the next question according to the past performance of the examinee. CAT algorithms are divided in two categories: summative CATs, that measure the level of examinees, and formative CATs, that provide feedback to the examinees at the end of the test by specifying which knowledge components need further work. In this paper, we formalize the problem of test-size reduction by predicting student performance, and propose a new hybrid CAT algorithm GenMA based on the general diagnostic model, that is both summative and formative. Using real datasets, we compare our model to popular CAT models and show that GenMA achieves better accuracy while using fewer questions than the existing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zernike, K.: Obama administration calls for limits on testing in schools (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Council, G.M.A.: Profile of GMAT Candidates - Executive Summary (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huebner, A.: An overview of recent developments in cognitive diagnostic computer adaptive assessments. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 15(3), n3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, D., von Davier, A.A., Lewis, C.: Computerized multistage testing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lan, A.S., Waters, A.E., Studer, C., Baraniuk, R.G.: Sparse factor analysis for learning and content analytics. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1959–2008 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Davier, M.: A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. ETS Research Report Series, p. i-35 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Desmarais, M.C., Baker, R.S.: A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 22, 9–38 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergner, Y., Droschler, S., Kortemeyer, G., Rayyan, S., Seaton, D., Pritchard, D.E.: Model-based collaborative filtering analysis of student response data: machine-learning item response theory. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verhelst, N.D.: Profile analysis: a closer look at the PISA 2000 reading data. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 56, 315–332 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reckase, M.: Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, X., Chang, H., Douglas, J.: A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, Y.: When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT. Psychometrika 74, 619–632 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chalmers, R.P.: mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–29 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cai, L.: Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. J. Educ. Behavi. Stat. 35, 307–335 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shute, V., Leighton, J.P., Jang, E.E., Chu, M.-W.: Advances in the science of assessment. Educ. Assess. 21(1), 34–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leighton, J.P., Gierl, M.J., Hunka, S.M.: The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: a variation on Tatsuoka’s rule-space approach. J. Educ. Measur. 41, 205–237 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rupp, A., Levy, R., Dicerbo, K.E., Sweet, S.J., Crawford, A.V., Calico, T., Benson, M., Fay, D., Kunze, K.L., Mislevy, R.J.: Putting ECD into practice: the interplay of theory and data in evidence models within a digital learning environment. JEDM-J. Educ. Data Min. 4, 49–110 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doignon, J.-P., Falmagne, J.-C.: Knowledge Spaces. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lynch, D., Howlin, C.P.: Real world usage of an adaptive testing algorithm to uncover latent knowledge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mandin, S., Guin, N.: Basing learner modelling on an ontology of knowledge and skills. In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced learning technologies (iCALT), pp. 321–323. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D.: Competence-based knowledge space theory. In: Measuring and Visualizing Learning in the Information-Rich Classroom, p. 109 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Paris-Saclay Institut de la Société Numérique funded by the IDEX Paris-Saclay, ANR-11-IDEX-0003-02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill-Jênn Vie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vie, JJ., Popineau, F., Bourda, Y., Bruillard, É. (2016). Adaptive Testing Using a General Diagnostic Model. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds) Adaptive and Adaptable Learning. EC-TEL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45152-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45153-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics