Abstract
Most practitioners and researchers agree that when developing software, process affects product, and the usefulness of a process depends on the context. However, which processes are most useful for a specific company or project is generally unknown. When studying the relation between context, process and product, one challenge is that experiments often lack realism, which makes the transfer of results to industry difficult. In contrast, most of the important factors vary beyond the researcher’s control in case studies, which makes it difficult to identify cause and effect relationships. This paper reports a study where realism was combined with control over certain context and process factors. Four companies developed the same system, and the price varied by a factor of six. Certain patterns of relationships were expected (expensive company, low cost, schedule overrun); others were unexpected (cheap company, maintainable system because of small code). The community needs to identify the most important relationships among process, context and outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dybå, T., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Cruzes, D.S.: What works for whom, where, when, and why? On the role of context in empirical software engineering. In: ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM (2012)
Brooks Jr., F.P.: The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1975)
Glass, R.L.: Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2002)
Endres, A., Dieter Rombach, H.: A Handbook of Software and Systems Engineering: Empirical Observations, Laws, and Theories. Pearson Education, New York (2003)
Boehm, B.W., McClean, R.K., Urfrig, D.E.: Some experience with automated aids to the design of large-scale reliable software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 1, 125–133 (1975)
Sjøberg, D.I.K., Hannay, J.E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V.B., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N.K., Rekdal, A.C.: A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(9), 733–753 (2005)
Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T., Anda, B.C., Hannay, J.E.: Building theories in software engineering. In: Shull, F., et al. (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 312–336. Springer, London (2008)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)
Jørgensen, M., Carelius, G.J.: An empirical study of software project bidding. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(12), 953–969 (2004)
Anda, B.C.D., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Mockus, A.: Variability and reproducibility in software engineering: A study of four companies that developed the same system. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(3), 407–429 (2009)
Anda, B., Benestad, H.C., Hove, S.E.: A multiple-case study of software effort estimation based on use case points. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 407–416 (2005)
Sjøberg, D.I.K., Anda, B.C., Mockus, A.: Questioning software maintenance metrics: a comparative case study. In: ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (2012)
Sjøberg, D.I.K., Yamashita, A., Anda, B.C., Mockus, A., Dybå, T.: Quantifying the effect of code smells on maintenance effort. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(8), 1144–1156 (2013)
Bergersen, G.R., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T.: Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring programming skill. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 40(12), 1163–1184 (2014)
Arisholm, E., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: Evaluating the effect of a delegated versus centralized control style on the maintainability of object-oriented software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(8), 521–534 (2004)
Anda, B., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: Investigating the role of use cases in the construction of class diagrams. Empirical Softw. Eng. 10(3), 285–309 (2005)
Følstad, A., Anda, B.C.D., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: The usability inspection performance of work-domain experts: An empirical study. Interact. Comput. 22(2), 75–87 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sjøberg, D.I.K. (2016). The Relationship Between Software Process, Context and Outcome. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49093-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)