Abstract
Teaching robotics is challenging because it is a multidisciplinary, rapidly evolving and experimental discipline that integrates cutting-edge hardware and software. This paper describes the course design and first implementation of Duckietown, a vehicle autonomy class that experiments with teaching innovations in addition to leveraging modern educational theory for improving student learning. We provide a robot to every student, thanks to a minimalist platform design, to maximize active learning; and introduce a role-play aspect to increase team spirit, by modeling the entire class as a fictional start-up (Duckietown Engineering Co.). The course formulation leverages backward design by formalizing intended learning outcomes (ILOs) enabling students to appreciate the challenges of: (a) heterogeneous disciplines converging in the design of a minimal self-driving car, (b) integrating subsystems to create complex system behaviors, and (c) allocating constrained computational resources. Students learn how to assemble, program, test and operate a self-driving car (Duckiebot) in a model urban environment (Duckietown), as well as how to implement and document new features in the system. Traditional course assessment tools are complemented by a full scale demonstration to the general public. The “duckie” theme was chosen to give a gender-neutral, friendly identity to the robots so as to improve student involvement and outreach possibilities. All of the teaching materials and code is released online in the hope that other institutions will adopt the platform and continue to evolve and improve it, so to keep pace with the fast evolution of the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111(23), 8410–8415 (2014)
Bloom, B.S.: The 2 sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Researcher 13(6), 4–16 (1984)
Wieman, C.E.: Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111(23), 8319–8320 (2014)
Halpern, D.F., Hakel, M.D.: Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond: teaching for long-term retention and transfer. Change Mag. High. Learn. 35(4), 36–41 (2003)
Wiggins, G., McTighe, J.: What is backward design? Understanding by Design, pp. 7–19 (2011)
Biggs, J.: Aligning teaching for constructing learning. Higher Education Academy, pp. 1–4 (2003)
Monaco, M., Martin, M.: The millennial student: a new generation of learners. Athletic Training Educ. J. 2, 42–46 (2007)
Novotney, A.: Engaging the Millennial Learner 41(3), 60 (2010)
Paull, L., Tani, J., Ahn, H., Alonso-Mora, J., Carlone, L., Cap, M., Chen, Y.F., Choi, C., Dusek, J., Fang, Y., Okuyama, I.F., Hoehener, D., Liu, S.Y., Novitzky, M., Pazis, J., Rosman, G., Varricchio, V., Wang, H.C., Yershov, D., Zhao, H., Benjamin, M., Carr, C., Zuber, M., Karaman, S., Frazzoli, E., Del Vecchio, D., Rus, D., How, J., Leonard, J., Censi, A.: Duckietown: an open, inexpensive and flexible platform for autonomy education and research. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2017), Submitted. http://duckietown.mit.edu/materials.html, Accessed 15 October 2016
Olson, E.: Apriltag: a robust and flexible visual fiducial system. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2011
Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I.: Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), October 2009
Green, T.: Why are too few females in robotics? could it be the robots? (2015)
Greensted, C.: Intended learning outcomes. EFMD Glob. Focus 8(1), 20–25 (2014)
Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.Y.: ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, vol. 3, p. 5, Kobe (2009)
Sturm, P.: Pinhole camera model. In: Computer Vision, pp. 610–613. Springer (2014)
Zhang, Z.: A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000)
Daum, F.: Nonlinear filters: beyond the kalman filter. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 20(8), 57–69 (2005)
Karlsson, N., Di Bernardo, E., Ostrowski, J., Goncalves, L., Pirjanian, P., Munich, M.E.: The vSLAM algorithm for robust localization and mapping. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 24–29. IEEE (2005)
Masehian, E., Sedighizadeh, D.: Classic and heuristic approaches in robot motion planning-A chronological review. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 29(1), 101–106 (2007)
Crowley, J.: Navigation for an intelligent mobile robot. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 1(1), 31–41 (1985)
Hafner, M.R., Cunningham, D., Caminiti, L., Del Vecchio, D.: Cooperative collision avoidance at intersections: algorithms and experiments. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 14(3), 1162–1175 (2013)
Duperret, J.M., Hafner, M.R., Del Vecchio, D.: Formal design of a provably safe robotic roundabout system. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2006–2011. IEEE (2010)
Cao, Y., Yu, W., Ren, W., Chen, G.: An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 9(1), 427–438 (2013)
Thrun, S., Burgard, W., Fox, D.: Probabilistic Robotics. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Tani, J., Mishra, S., Wen, J.T.: Motion blur-based state estimation. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 24(3), 1012–1019 (2016)
Tanenbaum, A.S., Van Steen, M.: Distributed Systems. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)
Bonin-Font, F., Ortiz, A., Oliver, G.: Visual navigation for mobile robots: a survey. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 53(3), 263–296 (2008)
Naser, F., Dorhout, D., Proulx, S., Pendleton, S.D., Andersen, H., Schwarting, W., Paull, L., Alonso-Mora, J., Jr., M.H.A., Karaman, S., Tedrake, R., Leonard, J., Rus, D.: A parallel autonomy research platform. In: IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–8 (2017). Submitted
Slack: Slack (2016) Accessed 10 October 2016
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the National Science foundation through award IIS #1318392 and through the National Robotics Initiative award #1405259. The work was also supported by the Toyota Research Institute and the Ford Motor Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tani, J. et al. (2017). Duckietown: An Innovative Way to Teach Autonomy. In: Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Menegatti, E. (eds) Educational Robotics in the Makers Era. Edurobotics 2016 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55552-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55553-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)