Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Semi-automatic Development of Modelling Techniques with Computational Linguistics Methods – A Procedure Model and Its Application

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 288))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In recent years, the number of domain-specific modelling techniques increased. Method engineering already provides text-based and semantic approaches which aim to unify constructs and allocate terminologies. As existing procedures are usually carried out manually, challenges arise such as reproducibility and standardization as well as ensuring quality. Hence, this paper aims to investigate how methods from the Computational Linguistics can be applied to automatically develop domain-specific modelling techniques in order to face these challenges. As a main result, we present a procedure model that was developed and applied in four iterations, recommend tools, methods and resources as well as reflect typical issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung/ressourcen/lexika/TagSets/stts-table.html .

  2. 2.

    Ontology of German language, www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/GermaNet/ (equivalent: WordNet).

References

  1. Pfeiffer, D., Niehaves, B.: Evaluation of conceptual models – a structuralist approach. In: Proceedings of the European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), p. 43 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evermann, J., Wand, Y.: Ontology based object-oriented domain modelling: fundamental concepts. Requirements Eng. 10(2), 146–160 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, J., Karow, M., Müller-Wienbergen, F.: Applying lessons learned from counselling: on nurturing relations in design projects. In: Proceedings of the European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), p. 54 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guizzardi, G., Ferreira Pires, L., Van Sinderen, M. J.: On the role of domain ontologies in the design of domain-specific visual modeling languages. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM OOPSLA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kishore, R., Sharman, R.: Computational ontologies and information systems I: foundations. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (CAIS) 14, 158–183 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fellmann, M., Thomas, O., Busch, B.: A query-driven approach for checking the semantic correctness of ontology-based process representations. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 87, pp. 62–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21863-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J.: Method Engineering Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support. Chapman & Hall, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, Y.: Semantic annotation for process models: facilitating process knowledge management via semantic interoperability. Ph.D. thesis, University of Trondheim (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: Proceedings of the European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 2206–2217 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Pfeiffer, D.: Ontological evaluation of conceptual models. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 20(2), 83–110 (2008). Article 4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, H., Kishore, R., Ramesh, R.: Ontological analysis of the MibML grammar using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model. In: Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), p. 553 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Ontological evaluation of reference models using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model. In: Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), p. 384 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D., Janiesch, C.: Percieved evaluability - development of a theoretical model and a measurement scale. In: Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), p. 153 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milton, S., Kazmierczak, E., Keen, C.: Data modelling languages: an ontological study. In: Proceedings of the European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), p. 304 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hofferer, P.: Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In: European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 1620–1631 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D.: Solving the conflicts of distributed process modelling: towards an integrated approach. In: Proceedings of the European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), p. 90 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gehlert, A., Buckmann, U., Esswein, W.: Ontology based method engineering. In: Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), p. 436 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holten, R., Dreiling, A., Becker, J.: Ontology-Driven Method Engineering for Information Systems Development. In: Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies, pp. 174–217. IDEA Group, Hershey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Integrating multi-perspective views into ontological analysis. In: International Conference in Information Systems (ICIS) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosemann, M., Wyssusek, B.: Enhancing the expressiveness of the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontology. In: American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), p. 438 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niknafs, A., Ramsin, R.: Computer-aided method engineering: an analysis of existing environments. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 525–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Leppänen, M.: An ontological framework of method engineering: an overall structure. In: 10th International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2007), pp. 11–12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Knackstedt, R.: Carsharing Geschäftsmodelle – Entwicklung eines bausteinbasierten Modellierungsansatzes. In: Thomas, O., Nüttgens, M., Fellmann, M. (eds.) Smart Service Engineering, pp. 303–325. Springer, Fachmedien (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kliche, F., Blessing, A., Heid, U., Sonntag, J.: The eIdentity text exploration workbench. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), pp. 691–697 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmad, K., Rogers, M.: Terminology management: a corpus-based approach. In: Translating and the Computer 14: Quality Standards and the Implementation of Technology in Translation, pp. 33–44 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Björkelund, A., Bohnet, B., Hafdell, L., Nugues, P: A high-performance syntactic and semantic dependency parser. In: Proceedings of the 23rd COLING, pp. 33–36 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cap, F.: Morphological processing of compounds for statistical machine translation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rösiger, I., Schäfer, J., George, T., Tannert, S., Heid, U., Dorna, M.: Extracting terms and their relations from German texts: NLP tools for the preparation of raw material for e-dictionaries. In: eLex Proceedings, Herstmonceux Castle, UK (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zwicky, F.: Discovery, Invention, Research - Through the Morphological Approach. The Macmillan Company, Toronto (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Strahinger, S.: Metamodellierung als Instrument des Methodenvergleichs: Eine Evaluierung am Beispiel objektorientierter Analysenmethoden. Shaker Verlag, Aachen (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schalles, C.: Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages. Springer Science, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D., Räckers, M.: Domain specific process modelling in public administrations – the PICTURE-approach. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74444-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Bakhshandeh, M., Pesquita, C., Borbinha, J.: An ontological matching approach for enterprise architecture model analysis. In: Abramowicz, W., Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds.) BIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 255, pp. 315–326. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39426-8_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Gailly, F., Poels, G.: Towards ontology-driven information systems: redesign and formalization of the REA ontology. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4439, pp. 245–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72035-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Reijers, Hajo A.: On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 512–520. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Rajman, M., Vesely, M.: From text to knowledge: document processing and visualization: a text mining approach. In: Sirmakessis, S. (ed.) Text Mining and Its Applications. STUDFUZZ, vol. 138, pp. 7–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Bailey, K.D.: Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Pittke, F., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: Automatic detection and resolution of lexical ambiguity in process models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 41(6), 526–544 (2015). doi:10.1109/TSE.2015.2396895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the State of Lower Saxony (Investitions- und Förderbank Niedersachsen) in the scope of the research project “SmartHybrid – Process Engineering” (ID: ZW 6-85003451). We like to thank them for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany

    Thorsten Schoormann, Dennis Behrens & Ralf Knackstedt

  2. Department of Information Science and Computational Linguistics, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany

    Ulrich Heid

Authors
  1. Thorsten Schoormann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis Behrens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrich Heid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ralf Knackstedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thorsten Schoormann or Dennis Behrens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Poznan University of Economics, Poznan, Poland

    Witold Abramowicz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Heid, U., Knackstedt, R. (2017). Semi-automatic Development of Modelling Techniques with Computational Linguistics Methods – A Procedure Model and Its Application. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 288. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59335-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59336-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation