Abstract
Deliberation is an effective method to solve complex problems. Unlike the persuasion and negotiation, deliberation is necessary to consider uncertainty information representation and processing. This paper proposes a quantitative deliberation model (QuDM) based on IBIS. Firstly, the IBIS model is simplified, without considering the specialization and generalization of the issue in the model, and the argument is divided into two parts: the premise and the conclusion. Premise and conclusion are all called statement. Then the uncertainty of argument’s premise and the intensity of argument are expressed by certainty-factors. In order to determine the certainty-factors of positions, a consensus building method is proposed, and the credibility values of all statements are calculated by a recursive algorithm. Finally, an example is used to verify the validity and rationality of the proposed method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Bratko, I., Chesñevar, C., Dvořák, W., Falappa, M., Fan, X., Gaggl, S., GarcÃa, A., González, M., Gordon, T., Leite, J., Možina, M., Reed, C., Simari, G., Szeider, S., Torroni, P., Woltran, S.: The added value of argumentation. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Agreement Technologies, vol. 8, pp. 357–403. Springer, Dordrecht (2013)
Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.: Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art. Comput. Support. Learn. 5, 43–102 (2010)
Heras, S., Jordán, J., Botti, V., Julián, V.: Case-based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies. Inf. Sci. 223, 1–30 (2013)
Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY,USA (1995)
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: 4th International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 7–12. IEEE Press (2000)
Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Kunz, W., Rittel, H.W.J.: Issues as Elements of Information Systems. University of California, Berkeley (1970)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321–357 (1995)
Eric, M.K., John-Jules, C.M., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: A formal argumentation framework for deliberation dialogues. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 73–90 (2010)
McBurney, P., Hitchcock, D., Parsons, S.: The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 22, 95–132 (2007)
Conklin, J., Bergman, M.: gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Syst. 6, 303–331 (1988)
Xiong, C.Q., Ouyang, Y., Mei, Q.: Argumentation model based on certainty-factor and algorithms of argument evaluation. J. Softw. 25, 1225–1238 (2014)
Shortliffe, E.H., Buchanan, B.G.: A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Math. Bio. 23, 351–379 (1975)
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant number 61075059, 61300127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, X., Xiong, C., Guo, J., Liu, G. (2018). Quantitative Deliberation Model and the Method of Consensus Building. In: Barolli, L., Terzo, O. (eds) Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 611. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61566-0_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61566-0_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61565-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61566-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)