Abstract
The software development process is continuously changing, there is huge pressure to condense release cycles into shorter and shorter timeframes, tools are changing dramatically and companies must continually examine the efficacy of their development process. Attempting to hit a moving target is difficult and it is a decision which can have a major effect in terms of both the end-product and the business. In this paper, we discuss the role of situational context in deciding upon the software development process through the analysis of two case studies. The case studies take a detailed look at the organisational profile and context of each company in turn before we compare and contrast each situational context for factors that may influence the development process. We then compare the processes each company has chosen before our discussion of the role context plays in choosing a ‘correct’ software development process. While both companies have enjoyed sustained business growth and while both are agile in mind-set, we find that they are in fact quite distinct in their processes, this distinction being driven by their different situational contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Leavy, B.: A complexity theory viewpoint on the software development process and situational context. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP 2016). IEEE, San Francisco (2016)
CMMI Product Team: CMMI for systems engineering/software engineering/integrated product and process development, version 1.02, CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD, v1.02. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1993)
Royce, W.: Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. In: Western Electric Show and Convention Technical Papers, 25–28 August. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1970)
CMMI Product Team: CMMI for Development, Version 1.2, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008. Pittsburgh, PA (2006)
Fowler, M., Highsmith, J.: The Agile Manifesto. Software Development (2001)
How would I know how badly we are losing out through sub-optimal software development. David Consulting Group (2015)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: towards a comprehensive reference framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54, 433–447 (2012)
Leader in Life: Accident & Health Insurance Software. https://www.fineos.com/
Node.js Consulting: Training, Co-Development & Micro Services. http://www.nearForm.com/
Blom, M.: Is scrum and XP suitable for CSE development? In: International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2010, May 31–June 2, Computational Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2010)
Vaidya, A.: Does DAD know best, is it better to do LeSS or just be SAFe? Adapting scaling agile practices into the enterprise. In: Thirty-Second Annual Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference 2014, October 20–22, World Trade Center Portland, Portland, Oregon (2014)
Oskam, I.: T-shaped engineers for interdisciplinary innovation: an attractive perspective for young people as well as a must for innovative organisations. In: SEFI 37th Annual Conference, 01 July 2004, Rotterdam, Netherlands (2009)
Zhang, X., Du, H., Chen, J., Lin, Y., Zeng, L.: Ensure data security in cloud storage. In: 2011 International Conference on Network Computing and Information Security, May 14–15, Guilin Park Hotel, Guilin, China (2011)
Financial Crime Task Force: Issues Paper on Cyber Risk to the Insurance Sector. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2016)
Owen Williams: It’s Time for Insurers to Shift from Waterfall to Agile, 21 October 2013. http://iireporter.com/its-time-for-insurers-to-shift-from-waterfall-to-agile/
Lindvall, M., Basili, V., et al.: Empirical findings in agile methods. In: Wells, D., Williams, L. (eds.) XP/Agile Universe 2002. LNCS, vol. 2418, pp. 197–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-45672-4_19
Kumar, R., Fareign, G.D., Cullen, M., Cadavez, J., Prasad, K.: Maximizing the business value from silos: service based transformation with service data models. In: 2011 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), 16–18 December BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, India (2011)
Henry, K.: The modernization problem, part 1: government & management of enterprise IT. ISACA J. 1, 49–51 (2013)
Solan, D.: FINEOS Software Development Presentation, DCU, 23 February 2017
O’Brian, C.: Eran Hammer joins Waterford firm nearForm. http://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/eran-hammer-joins-waterford-firm-nearForm-1.2244425
Elger, P.: nearForm Software Development Presentation, DCU, 6 March 2017
Hertel, G., Niedner, S., Herrmann, S.: Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Pol. 32(7), 1159–1177 (2003)
Colombo, M., Piva, E., Rossi-Lamastra, C.: Open innovation and within-industry diversification in small and medium enterprises: The case of open source software firms. Res. Policy 43, 891–902 (2014)
Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Could global software development benefit from agile methods? In: IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, p. 109. IEEE, Helsinki (2006)
Larman, C., Basili, V.: Iterative and incremental developments. a brief history. Computer 36, 47–56 (2003)
Dustin, E., Rashka, J., Paul, J.: Automated Software Testing: Introduction, Management, and Performance. 1st edn., p. 37. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (1999)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: Changing situational contexts present a constant challenge to software developers. In: O’Connor, R., Umay-Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2015). CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 100–111. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_9
O’Connor, R.V., Elger, P., Clarke, P.: Exploring the impact of situational context: a case study of a software development process for a microservices architecture. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Process (ICSSP), Co-Located with the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 6–10 (2016). doi:10.1145/2904354.2904368
Nevalainen, R., Clarke, P., McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Varkoi, T.: Situational factors in safety critical software development. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, Rory V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 132–147. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_11
Clarke, P., et al.: An investigation of software development process terminology. In: Clarke, Paul M., O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2016. CCIS, vol. 609, pp. 351–361. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_25
Clarke, Paul M., et al.: Refactoring software development process terminology through the use of ontology. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 47–57. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_4
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Yilmaz, M.: A hierarchy of SPI activities for software SMEs: results from ISO/IEC 12207-based SPI assessments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination (SPICE 2012), CCIS 290/2012, pp. 62–74 (2012)
O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.: Software process reflexivity and business performance: initial results from an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Process 2015 (ICSSP 2015), pp. 142–146. ACM SIG on Software Engineering, Tallinn (2015)
Acknowledgement
This work was supported, in part, by Science Foundation Ireland grant 13/RC/2094 to Lero – The Irish Software Research Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Clarke, P.M. et al. (2017). Exploring Software Process Variation Arising from Differences in Situational Context. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64217-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64218-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)