Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Analyzing Feedback Mechanisms in Group Decision Making Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017 (EUSFLAT 2017, IWIFSGN 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 643))

  • 824 Accesses

Abstract

As reaching the maximum consensus degree in the group decision making problems is very important, many consensus reaching processes have been proposed in the literature. An important step within a consensus reaching process is the feedback mechanism, in which the experts involved in the decision problem under consideration are advised to modify their opinions in order to increase the level of consensus achieved. Therefore, many different feedback mechanisms have been proposed in the existing literature. The aim of this study is to present three of them and analyze their strengths and weaknesses. To do so, an illustrative example is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bordogna, G., Fedrizzi, M., Pasi, G.: A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 27, 126–133 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler, C.T., Rothstein, A.: On Conflict and Consensus: A Handbook on Formal Consensus Decision Making. Creative Commons, Tahoma Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cabrerizo, F.J., Moreno, J.M., Pérez, I.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft. Comput. 14, 451–463 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eklund, P., Rusinowska, A., de Swart, H.: Consensus reaching in committees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178, 185–193 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 88, 31–49 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 16, 309–334 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multi-person decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 32, 394–402 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., Luque, M.: Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154, 98–109 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L., Mata, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 13, 644–658 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F.: A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 863–877 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F.J., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W.: A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf. Fusion 17, 4–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18, 105–118 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H.: Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49, 21–31 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S., Ras, Z.W.: How to support consensus reaching using action rules: a novel approach. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 18, 451–470 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mata, F., Martínez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E.: An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17, 279–290 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Orlovski, S.A.: Decision-making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 155–167 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Pérez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 44, 494–498 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 12, 117–131 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge FEDER funds under grants TIN2013-40658-P and TIN2016-75850-R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

    Atefeh Taghavi

  2. Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

    Esfandiar Eslami

  3. Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Francisco Javier Cabrerizo & Enrique Herrera-Viedma

Authors
  1. Atefeh Taghavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esfandiar Eslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Enrique Herrera-Viedma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Javier Cabrerizo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Janusz Kacprzyk

  2. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Eulalia Szmidt

  3. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Slawomir Zadrożny

  4. Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Bioinformatics and Mathematical Modelling, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Krassimir T. Atanassov

  5. WIT - Warsaw School of Information Technology, Warsaw, Poland

    Maciej Krawczak

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Taghavi, A., Eslami, E., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Analyzing Feedback Mechanisms in Group Decision Making Problems. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 643. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66827-7_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66827-7_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66826-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66827-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation